Advertisement

Production and characterization of lipopeptide biosurfactant producing Paenibacillus sp. D9 and its biodegradation of diesel fuel

  • A. A. Jimoh
  • J. LinEmail author
Original Paper
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

The current research aimed at analyzing the biodegradation efficiency of a potent biosurfactant producing Paenibacillus sp. D9, along with the characterization of the surface-active compound produced during diesel fuel biodegradation. The biosurfactant production by Paenibacillus sp. D9 was evaluated using diesel fuel as culture medium, subsequently analyzed for its structural characteristics using different methods and thus determining the biodegradation utilization. This strain showed wide cell surface hydrophobicity against varieties of hydrocarbon substrate tested. Paenibacillus sp. D9 displayed higher hydrophobicity to the long-chain hydrocarbons mixtures tested such as 71.5% diesel fuel, 70.0% engine oil and 76.0% n-paraffin. The optimum condition for biosurfactant synthesis was obtained in a medium containing 10% (v/v) diesel fuel with a production yield of 4.7 g/L. The resultant biosurfactant reduced surface tension from 71.4 to 30.1 mN/m against carbon source utilized. The critical micelle concentration value of the biosurfactant was 200 mg/L with emulsification efficiencies against a wide range of hydrophobic pollutants. With different physiochemical and analytical methods, the study demonstrated that the genus Paenibacillus produced a low molecular weight lipopeptide biosurfactant. Its emulsifying ability further supports its potential use in environmental and biotechnological applications.

Keywords

Biotechnological application Characterization Emulsification Hydrocarbon Surface tension 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof T. Puckree, ex-Executive Dean of Health Sciences, the Durban University of Technology, South Africa for manuscript editing.

Supplementary material

13762_2019_2341_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (15 kb)
Fig. S1 Surface tension changes of biosurfactant of Paenibacillus sp. D9 against different concentration of biosurfactant solution. All data points are means ± standard deviation (S.D.) of three independent biological repetitions (n=3) (XLSX 15 kb)
13762_2019_2341_MOESM2_ESM.tif (320 kb)
Fig. S2 TLC Analysis of purified biosurfactant of Paenibacillus sp. D9 (TIFF 319 kb)
13762_2019_2341_MOESM3_ESM.tif (59 kb)
Fig. S3 Peptide structure generated from the purified lipopeptide biosurfactant (TIFF 59 kb)
13762_2019_2341_MOESM4_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 13 kb)
13762_2019_2341_MOESM5_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. Ahmad SA, Ku Ahamad KNE, Wan Johari WL, Halmi MIE, Shukor MY, Yusof MT (2014) Kinetics of diesel degradation by an acrylamide-degrading bacterium. Rend Lincei 25:505–512.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-014-0344-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Disi Z, Jaoua S, Al-Thani D, Al-Meer S, Zouari N (2017) Considering the specific impact of harsh conditions and oil weathering on diversity, adaptation, and activity of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in strategies of bioremediation of harsh oily-polluted soils. Biomed Res Int 2017:8649350.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8649350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Bahry SN, Al-Wahaibi YM, Elshafie AE, Al-Bemani AS, Joshi SJ, Al-Makhmari HS, Al-Sulaimani HS (2013) Biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis B20 using date molasses and its possible application in enhanced oil recovery. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 81:141–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Wahaibi Y, Joshi S, Al-Bahry S, Elshafie A, Al-Bemani A, Shibulal B (2014) Biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis B30 and its application in enhancing oil recovery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 114:324–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezza FA, Chirwa EMN (2017) Pyrene biodegradation enhancement potential of lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by Paenibacillus dendritiformis CN5 strain. J Hazard Mater 321:218–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezza FA, Nkhalambayausi Chirwa EM (2015) Biosurfactant from Paenibacillus dendritiformis and its application in assisting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and motor oil sludge removal from contaminated soil and sand media. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:354–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgos-Díaz C, Pons R, Espuny MJ, Aranda FJ, Teruel JA, Manresa A, Ortiz A, Marqués AM (2011) Isolation and partial characterization of a biosurfactant mixture produced by Sphingobacterium sp. isolated from soil. J Colloid Interface Sci 361:195–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahalan F, Yunus I, frvbW Johari W, Shukor M, Halmi M, Shamaan N, Syed M (2014) Growth kinetics of a diesel-degrading bacterial strain from petroleum-contaminated soil. J Environ Biol 35:399Google Scholar
  9. Datta P, Tiwari P, Pandey LM (2018) Isolation and characterization of biosurfactant producing and oil degrading Bacillus subtilis MG495086 from formation water of Assam oil reservoir and its suitability for enhanced oil recovery. Bioresour Technol 270:439–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng MC et al (2016) Characterization of a novel biosurfactant produced by marine hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium Achromobacter sp. HZ01. J Appl Microbiol 120:889–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dharni S, Alam M, Samad A, Khan F, Luqman S, Patra DD (2012) Phylogenetic analysis and biological activity of Streptomyces sp. CIMAP-A 2 isolated from industrially polluted soil. Indian J Biotechnol 11:438–444Google Scholar
  12. Durval IJB, Resende AHM, Figueiredo MA, Luna JM, Rufino RD, Sarubbo LA (2018) Studies on biosurfactants produced using Bacillus cereus Isolated from seawater with biotechnological potential for marine oil-spill bioremediation. J Surfactants Deterg.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12218 Google Scholar
  13. Elazzazy AM, Abdelmoneim TS, Almaghrabi OA (2015) Isolation and characterization of biosurfactant production under extreme environmental conditions by alkali-halo-thermophilic bacteria from Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:466–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ganesh A, Lin J (2009) Diesel degradation and biosurfactant production by Gram-positive isolates. Afr J Biotechnol 8:5847–5854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghojavand H, Vahabzadeh F, Azizmohseni F (2011) A halotolerant, thermotolerant, and facultative biosurfactant producer: identification and molecular characterization of a bacterium and evolution of emulsifier stability of a lipopeptide biosurfactant. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 16:72–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-010-0148-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Govarthanan M, Mythili R, Selvankumar T, Kamala-Kannan S, Rajasekar A, Chang YC (2016) Bioremediation of heavy metals using an endophytic bacterium Paenibacillus sp. RM isolated from the roots of Tridax procumbens. 3 Biotech 6:242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0560-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gudina EJ, Pereira JF, Costa R, Evtuguin DV, Coutinho JA, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR (2015) Novel bioemulsifier produced by a Paenibacillus strain isolated from crude oil. Microb Cell Fact 14:14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0197-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo Y, Huang E, Yuan C, Zhang L, Yousef AE (2012) Isolation of a Paenibacillus sp. strain and structural elucidation of its broad-spectrum lipopeptide antibiotic. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3156–3165.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07782-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ismail W, Al-Rowaihi IS, Al-Humam AA, Hamza RY, El Nayal AM, Bououdina M (2013) Characterization of a lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by a crude-oil-emulsifying Bacillus sp. I-15. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 84:168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jimoh AA, Lin J (2018) Enhancement of Paenibacillus sp. D9 lipopeptide biosurfactant production through the optimization of medium composition and its application for biodegradation of hydrophobic pollutants. Appl Biochem Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-018-2847-7 Google Scholar
  21. Mesbaiah FZ, Eddouaouda K, Badis A, Chebbi A, Hentati D, Sayadi S, Chamkha M (2016) Preliminary characterization of biosurfactant produced by a PAH-degrading Paenibacillus sp. under thermophilic conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:14221–14230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6526-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Najafi AR, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri AH, Roostaazad R, Arabian D, Soleimani M, Jamshidnejad Z (2011) Interactive optimization of biosurfactant production by Paenibacillus alvei ARN63 isolated from an Iranian oil well. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 82:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parthipan P, Preetham E, Machuca LL, Rahman PK, Murugan K, Rajasekar A (2017) Biosurfactant and degradative enzymes mediated crude oil degradation by bacterium Bacillus subtilis A1. Front Microbiol 8:193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patowary K, Patowary R, Kalita MC, Deka S (2017) Characterization of biosurfactant produced during degradation of hydrocarbons using crude oil as sole source of carbon. Front Microbiol 8:279.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pirog T, Shulyakova M, Sofilkanych A, Shevchuk T, Mashchenko O (2015) Biosurfactant synthesis by Rhodococcus erythropolis IMV Ac-5017, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus IMV B-7241 and Nocardia vaccinii IMV B-7405 on byproduct of biodiesel production. Food Bioprod Process 93:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2013.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qian CD, Wu XC, Teng Y, Zhao WP, Li O, Fang SG, Huang ZH, Gao HC (2011) Battacin (Octapeptin B5), a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic from Paenibacillus tianmuensis active against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1458–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.05580-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reddy PV, Karegoudar TB, Nayak AS (2018) Enhanced utilization of fluorene by Paenibacillus sp. PRNK-6: effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactant and synthetic surfactants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 151:206–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma D, Saharan BS, Chauhan N, Procha S, Lal S (2015) Isolation and functional characterization of novel biosurfactant produced by Enterococcus faecium. SpringerPlus 4:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shukor M, Dahalan F, Jusoh A, Muse R, Shamaan N, Syed M (2009) Characterization of a diesel-degrading strain isolated from a hydrocarbon-contaminated site. J Environ Biol 30(1):145–150Google Scholar
  30. Thavasi R, Sharma S, Jayalakshmi S (2013) Evaluation of screening methods for the isolation of biosurfactant producing marine bacteria. J Pet Environ Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7463.s1-001 Google Scholar
  31. Wang W, Cai B, Shao Z (2014) Oil degradation and biosurfactant production by the deep sea bacterium Dietzia maris As-13-3. Front Microbiol 5:711.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00711 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering, and ScienceUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal (Westville)DurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations