Advertisement

Thermal desorption of chemical warfare agents surrogate from polluted materials: from laboratory to pilot scale

  • M. SvabEmail author
  • P. Masin
  • J. Krouzek
  • V. Durdak
  • P. Kubinova
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

The persistent threat of attack by chemical warfare agents should lead security and rescue services both to avoiding or minimising their serious acute impacts and rapidly and safely eliminating hazardous contaminated material. Low-volatile chemical warfare agents can be treated by thermal desorption that is efficient, versatile and easily available technology for solid waste remediation. We studied the application of thermal desorption technology, using diethyl phthalate as an appropriate chemical warfare agents surrogate. The conventional concept of indirectly heated material by thermal conduction was extended by innovative microwave heating in this study. In laboratory tests, the efficient desorption temperature was evaluated for six different spiked matrices. In addition, the technology using both heating approaches was verified in developed pilot-scale apparatuses for the treatment of several tens of kg of two material samples. For the diethyl phthalate removal, the mild conditions of 250 °C temperature were efficient in all experiments, with the temperature being a driving parameter for desorption. We observed insignificant differences in removal efficiency in various matrices or with differently applied heating methods; all residual concentrations were less than the detection limit. The achieved results confirmed the high potential of thermal desorption technology implementation in handling material contaminated by chemical warfare agents.

Keywords

Chemical warfare agents Surrogates Thermal desorption Decontamination Diethyl phthalate Solid waste 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic [Grant No.: VI20162019032].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acierno D, Barba AA, D’Amore M, Pinto IM, Fiumara V (2004) Microwaves in soil remediation from VOCs. 2. Buildup of a dedicated device. AIChE J 50:722–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albright RD (2012) Recommendations. In: Albright RD (ed) Cleanup of chemical and explosive munitions, 2nd edn. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp 119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-3477-5.00009-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker RS, LaChance J, Heron G (2006) In-pile thermal desorption of PAHs, PCBs and dioxins/furans in soil and sediment. Land Contamin Reclam 14:620–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker RS, Tarmasiewicz D, Bierschenk JM, King J, Landler T, Sheppard D (2007) Completion of in situ thermal remediation of PAHs, PCP and dioxins at a former wood treatment facility. Paper presented at the annual international conference on incineration and thermal treatment technologies, IT3Google Scholar
  5. Bartelt-Hunt SL, Knappe DRU, Barlaz MA (2008) A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 38:112–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701643650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bientinesi M, Petarca L, Cerutti A, Bandinelli M, De Simoni M, Manotti M, Maddinelli G (2013) A radiofrequency/microwave heating method for thermal heavy oil recovery based on a novel tight-shell conceptual design. J Petrol Sci Eng 107:18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozek F, Komar A, Dvorak J, Obermajer J (2009) Implementation of best available techniques in the sanitation of relict burdens. Clean Technol Environ Pol 12:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0217-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buttress AJ, Binner E, Yi C, Palade P, Robinson JP, Kingman SW (2016) Development and evaluation of a continuous microwave processing system for hydrocarbon removal from solids. Chem Eng Technol 283:215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Certini G, Scalenghe R, Woods WI (2013) The impact of warfare on the soil environment. Earth-Sci Rev 127:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Percin PR (1995) Application of thermal desorption technologies to hazardous waste sites. J Hazard Mater 40:203–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(94)00085-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di P, Chang DPY (2001) Investigation of PCB removal from contaminated soil using microwave generated steam. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 51:482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellison DH (2007) Handbook of chemical and biological warfare agents, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Falciglia PP, Vagliasindi FGA (2015) Remediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils using 2.45 GHz frequency-heating: influence of operating power and soil texture on soil temperature profiles and contaminant removal kinetics. J Geochem Explor 151:66–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falciglia PP, Giustra MG, Vagliasindi FG (2011) Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil: influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics. J Hazard Mater 185:392–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao G, Jiang J, Xiao Y, Zhou L (2012) Vacuum-enhanced far-infrared thermal desorption of clay soil polluted by r-Hexachlorocyclohexane. Adv Mat Res 518–523:1716–1719Google Scholar
  16. Gao YF, Yang H, Zhan XH, Zhou LX (2013) Scavenging of BHCs and DDTs from soil by thermal desorption and solvent washing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1482–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0991-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu Q, Xu D, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Li F (2012) HCH removal efficiency related to temperature and particle size of soil in an ex situ thermal desorption process. Fresenius Environ Bull 21:3636–3642Google Scholar
  18. He Z, Li Z, Zhang Q, Wei Z, Duo J, Pan X (2019) Simultaneous remediation of As (III) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) in soil by a manganese-oxidizing bacterium and its mechanisms. Chemosphere 220:837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendrych J, Kubal M, Ederová J, Mašín P (2014) Thermogravimetric analysis as significant tool for suitability assessment of solid waste destined for processing by thermal desorption. Global NEST J 16:814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiester U, Schrenk V (2005) In-situ thermal remediation: ecological and economic advantages of the TUBA and THERIS methods. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ConSoil 2005, Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  21. Holzer F, Buchenhorst D, Kohler R, Gaffron A, Weiss H, Kopinke FD, Roland U (2013) Demonstration of in situ radio-frequency heating at a former industrial site. Chem Eng Technol 36:1108–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201300129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huon G, Simpson T, Holzer F, Maini G, Will F, Kopinke FD, Roland U (2012) In situ radio-frequency heating for soil remediation at a former service station: case study and general aspects. Chem Eng Technol 35:1534–1544.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201200027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iben IET et al (1996) Thermal blanket for in-situ remediation of surficial contamination: a pilot test. Env Sci Technol 30:3144–3154.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es9506622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeon S-B, Kim M-C, J-h Cho, Jung J-H, Oh K-J (2013) Desorption kinetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil using lab-scale rotary desorber. Korean J Chem Eng 30:1896–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0129-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krouzek J, Masin P, Hendrych J, Kubal M (2012) Laboratory tests of microwave heating of solid wastes in thermal desorption technology development. Waste Forum 3:137–143Google Scholar
  26. Krouzek J, Durdak V, Hendrych J, Masin P, Sobek J, Spacek P (2018) Pilot scale applications of microwave heating for soil remediation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 130:53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lavoie J, Srinivasan S, Nagarajan R (2011) Using cheminformatics to find simulants for chemical warfare agents. J Hazard Mater 194:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li JH, Sun XF, Yao ZT, Zhao XY (2014) Remediation of 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene contaminated soil using a combined thermal desorption-molten salt oxidation reactor system. Chemosphere 97:125–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lillie SH, Hanlon E, Kelly MJ, Rayburn BB (2005) Potential military chemical/biological agents and compounds vol FM 3-11.9, MCRP 3-37.1B, NTRP 3-11.32, AFTTP(I) 3-2.55. Eximdyne, Fort Monroe, Quantico, Newport, Maxwell AF Base. ISBN 9780967726403Google Scholar
  30. McFarland MD, Bixler AJ, Krishnan M, Hanwehr RV (2001) Biological weapons agent defeat using directed microwave energy. In: IEEE international conference on plasma science, pp O2A7–O2A8Google Scholar
  31. Risoul V, Renauld V, Trouvé G, Gilot P (2002) A laboratory pilot study of thermal decontamination of soils polluted by PCBs. Comparison with thermogravimetric analysis. Waste Manag 22:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson JP, Kingman SW, Snape CE, Bradshaw SM, Bradley MSA, Shang H, Barranco R (2010) Scale-up and design of a continuous microwave treatment system for the processing of oil-contaminated drill cuttings. Chem Eng Res Des 88:146–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2009.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roland U, Holzer F, Kraus M, Trommler U, Kopinke FD (2011) Electrode design for soil decontamination with radio-frequency heating. Chem Eng Technol 34:1652–1659.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201100227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shuai W, Gu C, Fang G, Zhou D, Gao J (2018) Effects of iron (hydr)oxides on the degradation of diethyl phthalate ester in heterogeneous (photo)-Fenton reactions. J Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.06.015 (in press) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silcox GD, Pershing DW (1990) The effects of rotary kiln operating conditions and design on burden heating rates as determined by a mathematical model of rotary kiln heat transfer. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 40:337–344.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smart JL (2005) Application of six-phase soil heating technology for groundwater remediation. Environ Prog 24:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith MT, Berruti F, Mehrotra AK (2001) Thermal desorption treatment of contaminated soils in a novel batch thermal reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5421–5430.  https://doi.org/10.1021/Ie0100333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thurnau RC, Manning JA (1996) Low temperature desorption applications of a direct-fired rotary kiln incinerator. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 46:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vidonish JE, Zygourakis K, Masiello CA, Sabadell G, Alvarez PJJ (2016) Thermal treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted soils: a review of technology innovation for sustainable remediation. Engineering 2:426–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang H et al (2018) Using biochar for remediation of contaminated soils. In: Luo Y, Tu C (eds) Twenty years of research and development on soil pollution and remediation in China. Springer, Singapore, pp 763–783.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6029-8_47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolfe NL, Steen WC, Burns LA (1980) Phthalate ester hydrolysis: linear free energy relationships. Chemosphere 9:403–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(80)90023-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dekonta Ltd.StehelcevesCzech Republic
  2. 2.University of Chemistry and TechnologyPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations