Thermal desorption of chemical warfare agents surrogate from polluted materials: from laboratory to pilot scale
- 52 Downloads
The persistent threat of attack by chemical warfare agents should lead security and rescue services both to avoiding or minimising their serious acute impacts and rapidly and safely eliminating hazardous contaminated material. Low-volatile chemical warfare agents can be treated by thermal desorption that is efficient, versatile and easily available technology for solid waste remediation. We studied the application of thermal desorption technology, using diethyl phthalate as an appropriate chemical warfare agents surrogate. The conventional concept of indirectly heated material by thermal conduction was extended by innovative microwave heating in this study. In laboratory tests, the efficient desorption temperature was evaluated for six different spiked matrices. In addition, the technology using both heating approaches was verified in developed pilot-scale apparatuses for the treatment of several tens of kg of two material samples. For the diethyl phthalate removal, the mild conditions of 250 °C temperature were efficient in all experiments, with the temperature being a driving parameter for desorption. We observed insignificant differences in removal efficiency in various matrices or with differently applied heating methods; all residual concentrations were less than the detection limit. The achieved results confirmed the high potential of thermal desorption technology implementation in handling material contaminated by chemical warfare agents.
KeywordsChemical warfare agents Surrogates Thermal desorption Decontamination Diethyl phthalate Solid waste
This work was supported by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic [Grant No.: VI20162019032].
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Albright RD (2012) Recommendations. In: Albright RD (ed) Cleanup of chemical and explosive munitions, 2nd edn. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-3477-5.00009-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baker RS, Tarmasiewicz D, Bierschenk JM, King J, Landler T, Sheppard D (2007) Completion of in situ thermal remediation of PAHs, PCP and dioxins at a former wood treatment facility. Paper presented at the annual international conference on incineration and thermal treatment technologies, IT3Google Scholar
- Bientinesi M, Petarca L, Cerutti A, Bandinelli M, De Simoni M, Manotti M, Maddinelli G (2013) A radiofrequency/microwave heating method for thermal heavy oil recovery based on a novel tight-shell conceptual design. J Petrol Sci Eng 107:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellison DH (2007) Handbook of chemical and biological warfare agents, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Falciglia PP, Vagliasindi FGA (2015) Remediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils using 2.45 GHz frequency-heating: influence of operating power and soil texture on soil temperature profiles and contaminant removal kinetics. J Geochem Explor 151:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gao G, Jiang J, Xiao Y, Zhou L (2012) Vacuum-enhanced far-infrared thermal desorption of clay soil polluted by r-Hexachlorocyclohexane. Adv Mat Res 518–523:1716–1719Google Scholar
- Gu Q, Xu D, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Li F (2012) HCH removal efficiency related to temperature and particle size of soil in an ex situ thermal desorption process. Fresenius Environ Bull 21:3636–3642Google Scholar
- Hiester U, Schrenk V (2005) In-situ thermal remediation: ecological and economic advantages of the TUBA and THERIS methods. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ConSoil 2005, Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Krouzek J, Masin P, Hendrych J, Kubal M (2012) Laboratory tests of microwave heating of solid wastes in thermal desorption technology development. Waste Forum 3:137–143Google Scholar
- Lillie SH, Hanlon E, Kelly MJ, Rayburn BB (2005) Potential military chemical/biological agents and compounds vol FM 3-11.9, MCRP 3-37.1B, NTRP 3-11.32, AFTTP(I) 3-2.55. Eximdyne, Fort Monroe, Quantico, Newport, Maxwell AF Base. ISBN 9780967726403Google Scholar
- McFarland MD, Bixler AJ, Krishnan M, Hanwehr RV (2001) Biological weapons agent defeat using directed microwave energy. In: IEEE international conference on plasma science, pp O2A7–O2A8Google Scholar
- Robinson JP, Kingman SW, Snape CE, Bradshaw SM, Bradley MSA, Shang H, Barranco R (2010) Scale-up and design of a continuous microwave treatment system for the processing of oil-contaminated drill cuttings. Chem Eng Res Des 88:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2009.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar