Advertisement

Comparison of different iron oxide adsorbents for combined arsenic, vanadium and fluoride removal from drinking water

  • A. ChiavolaEmail author
  • E. D’Amato
  • M. R. Boni
Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Contamination of groundwater by arsenic due to natural processes is rather common worldwide and hinders its use for drinking water supply. In many cases, arsenic contamination is found together with high levels of vanadium and fluoride. Therefore, more than one type of treatment is required to reduce concentrations of all these contaminants below non-hazardous levels so to make the source drinkable. The present study investigated the uptake capacity of arsenic, vanadium and fluoride by three iron-based adsorbent media differing for particle size, iron content and specific surface. The aim of the treatment was to achieve the maximum allowable concentration set on drinking water by the law. The removal efficiency was evaluated in single and binary contaminated solutions. All the tested adsorbents demonstrated an efficient and rapid removal process of both arsenic and vanadium in the single and binary solutions, with a higher adsorption capacity for vanadium; by contrast, they were unable to achieve an appreciable reduction in fluoride concentration. The particle size showed to have the highest effect on the removal rate. The best kinetic and isotherm models and the related parameters were determined for each condition. In the binary solutions, the presence of vanadium hindered the uptake of arsenic, whereas fluoride did not have any effect. The results obtained showed that the iron-based adsorbents tested in the present study can be successfully applied for the treatment of drinking water contaminated by arsenic and vanadium, whereas a different medium or process needs to be adopted for the removal of fluoride.

Keywords

Adsorption Arsenic Fluoride Drinking water Iron oxide Vanadium 

Notes

Acknowledgements

None external financial support was received for the research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abe I, Iwasaki S, Tokimoto T, Kawasaki N, Nakamura T, Tanada S (2004) Adsorption of fluoride ions onto carbonaceous materials. J Colloid Interface Sci 275:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abejón R, Garea A (2015) A bibliometric analysis of research on arsenic in drinking water during the 1992–2012 period: an outlook to treatment alternatives for arsenic removal. J Water Process Eng 6:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adhikary SK, Tipnis UK, Harkare WP, Govindan KP (1989) Defluoridation during desalination of brackish water by electrodialysis. Desalination 71:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21 edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2012) Toxicological profile for vanadiumGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee K, Amy GL, Prevost M, Nour S, Jekel M, Gallagher PM, Blumenschein CD (2008) Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res 42:3371–3378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiavola A, D’Amato E, Baciocchi R (2012) Ion exchange treatment of groundwater contaminated by arsenic in the presence of sulphate. Breakthrough experiments and modeling. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2373–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chinoy NJ (1991) Effects of fluoride on physiology of animals and human beings. Indian J Environ Toxicol 1:17–32Google Scholar
  9. Das N, Sengupta SR (2008) Arsenicosis: diagnosis and treatment. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 74:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinelli E, Lima A, Albanese S, Birke M, Cicchella D, Giaccio L, Valera P, De Vivo B (2012) Major and trace elements in tap water from Italy. J Geochem Explor 112:54–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D.Lgs. 31/2001 (2001) Decreto legislativo 2 Febbraio 2001, n. 31, attuazione della direttiva 98/83/CE relativa alla qualità delle acque destinate al consumo umano. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 52 del 03-03-2001Google Scholar
  12. Ergul S, Ferranti F, Sappa G (2013) Arsenic in the aquifer systems of Viterbo Region, Central Italy: distribution and geochemistry. Rend Online Soc Geol It 24:116–118Google Scholar
  13. Eskandarpour A, Onyango MS, Ochieng A, Asai S (2008) Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution at low pH using schwertmannite. J Hazard Mater 152:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EU Directive 98/83/EC (1998) Council Directive of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union L 330, 32 (5.12.1998)Google Scholar
  15. Ghorai S, Pant KK (2005) Equilibrium, kinetics and breakthrough studies for adsorption of fluoride on activated alumina. Sep Purif Technol 42:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg S, Johnston CT (2001) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 234:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golzar Hossain MD, Selim Reza AHM, Lutfun-Nessa MST, Ahmed SS (2013) Factor and cluster analysis of water quality data of the groundwater wells of Kushtia, Bangladesh: implication for arsenic enrichment and mobilization. J Geol Soc India 81:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison PTC (2005) Fluoride in water: a UK perspective. J Fluorine Chem 126:1448–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He J, Charlet L (2013) A review of arsenic presence in China drinking water. J Hydrol 492:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer (2004) Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic, vol. 84. IARC Monographs, LyonGoogle Scholar
  21. Kruse E, Ainchil J (2003) Fluoride variations in groundwater of an area in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Environ Geol 44:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Ji M, Jung W, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Lee G, Song H, Choi JY, Yang JS, Jeon BH (2009) Defluoridation from aqueous solutions by granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res 43:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazaridis NK, Jekel M, Zouboulis AI (2003) Removal of Cr(VI), Mo(VI), and V(V) ions from single metal aqueous solutions by sorption or nanofiltration. Sep Sci Technol 38(10):2201–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leist M, Casey RJ, Caridi D (2000) The management of arsenic wastes: problems and prospects. J Hazard Mater 76:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leiviskä T, Matusik J, Muir B, Tanskanen J (2017a) Vanadium removal by organo-zeolites and iron-based products from contaminated natural water. J Cleaner Product 167:589–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leiviskä T, Kamran Khalid M, Sarpola A, Tanskanen J (2017b) Removal of vanadium from industrial wastewater using iron sorbents in batch and continuous flow pilot systems. J Environ Manag 190:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meenakshi MR (2006) Fluoride in drinking water and its removal. J Hazard Mater B137:456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Bricka M, Smith F, Yancey B, Mohammad J, Steeke PH, Alexandre-Franco MF, Gómez-Serrano V, Gong H (2007) Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J. Colloid Interface Sci 310(1):57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Papageorgiou SK, Katsaros FK, Kouvelos EP, Kanellopoulos NK (2009) Prediction of binary adsorption isotherms of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ on calcium alginate beads from single adsorption data. J Hazard Mater 162:1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polowczyk I, Cyganowski P, Ulatowska J, Sawiński W, Bastrzyk A (2018) Synthetic iron oxides for adsorptive removal of arsenic. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Popat KM, Anand PS, Dasare BD (1994) Selective removal of fluoride ions from water by the aluminum form of the aminomethylphosphoric acid-type ion exchanger. React Polym 23:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quezada A, Ohara K, Ratanawimarnwong N, Nacapricha D, Murakami H, Teshima N, Sakai T (2015) Stopped-in-loop flow analysis system for successive determination of trace vanadium and iron in drinking water using their catalytic reactions. Talanta 144:844–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roccaro P, Vagliasindi FGA (2015) Coprecipitation of vanadium with iron(III) in drinking water: a pilot-scale study. Desalin Water Treat 55:799–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sehn P (2008) Fluoride removal with extra low energy reverse osmosis membranes: three years of large scale field experience in Finland. Desalination 223:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen F, Chen X, Gao P, Chen G (2003) Electrochemical removal of fluoride ions from industrial wastewater. Chem Eng Sci 58:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Streat M, Hellgardt K, Newton NLR (2008) Hydrous ferric oxide as an adsorbent in water treatment: part 3: Batch and mini-column adsorption of arsenic, phosphorus, fluorine and cadmium ions. Process Saf Environ Prot 86:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tchieda VK, D’Amato E, Chiavola A, Parisi M, Chianese A, Amamra M, Kanaev A (2016) Removal of arsenic by alumina: effects of material size, additives, and water contaminants. Clean 44(5):496–505Google Scholar
  38. WHO World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. WRC (2001) Distribution of fluoride-rich groundwater in Eastern and Mogwase region of Northern and North-west province. WRC Report No. 526/1/01 1.1-9.85 PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  40. Ye C, Sun Y, Pei X, Sun J, Wu Y (2017) Mass transfer and equilibrium characteristics of defluorination from groundwater by emulsion liquid membrane. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Industrial EngineeringSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations