Advertisement

High-solids anaerobic digestion requires a trade-off between total solids, inoculum-to-substrate ratio and ammonia inhibition

  • V. Pastor-PoquetEmail author
  • S. Papirio
  • E. Trably
  • J. Rintala
  • R. Escudié
  • G. Esposito
Original Paper

Abstract

Increasing total solids in anaerobic digestion can reduce the methane yield by highly complex bio-physical–chemical mechanisms. Therefore, understanding those mechanisms and their main drivers becomes crucial to optimize this waste treatment biotechnology. In this study, seven batch experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of increasing the initial total solids in high-solids anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. With inoculum-to-substrate ratio = 1.5 g VS/g VS and maximum total solids ≤ 19.6%, mono-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste showed a methane yield = 174–236 NmL CH4/g VS. With inoculum-to-substrate ratio ≤ 1.0 g VS/g VS and maximum total solids ≥ 24.0%, mono-digestion experiments acidified. Co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and beech sawdust permitted to reduce the inoculum-to-substrate ratio to 0.16 g VS/g VS while increasing total solids up to 30.2%, though achieving a lower methane yield (117–156 NmL CH4/g VS). At each inoculum-to-substrate ratio, higher total solids corresponded to higher ammonia and volatile fatty acid accumulation. Thus, a 40% lower methane yield for mono-digestion was observed at a NH3 concentration ≥ 2.3 g N–NH3/kg reactor content and total solids = 15.0%. Meanwhile, co-digestion lowered the nitrogen content, being the risk of acidification exacerbated only at total solids ≥ 20.0%. Therefore, the biodegradability of the substrate, as well as the operational total solids and inoculum-to-substrate ratio, are closely interrelated parameters determining the success of methanogenesis, but also the risk of ammonia inhibition in high-solids anaerobic digestion.

Keywords

High-solids anaerobic digestion Organic fraction of municipal solid waste Batch experiments Co-digestion Thermophilic Methane yield Volatile fatty acids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 643071. The authors thank Luca Cioci and Gelsomino Monteverde for helping with the batch preparation and bio-physical–chemical analyses.

References

  1. Abbassi-Guendouz A, Brockmann D, Trably E, Dumas C, Delgenès JP, Steyer JP, Escudié R (2012) Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation. Bioresour Technol 111:55–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André L, Pauss A, Ribeiro T (2018) Solid anaerobic digestion: state-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles. Bioresour Technol 247:1027–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelidaki I, Sanders W (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Bio 3:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APHA (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbelkacem H, Bollon J, Bayard R, Escudié R, Buffière P (2015) Towards optimization of the total solid content in high-solid (dry) municipal solid waste digestion. Chem Eng J 273:261–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollon J, Benbelkacem H, Gourdon R, Buffière P (2013) Measurement of diffusion coefficients in dry anaerobic digestion media. Chem Eng Sci 89:115–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown D, Li Y (2013) Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 127:275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown D, Shi J, Li Y (2012) Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production. Bioresour Technol 124:379–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capson-Tojo G, Trably E, Rouez M, Crest M, Steyer JP, Delgenès JP, Escudié R (2017) Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste and cardboard at different substrate loads, solid contents and co-digestion proportions. Bioresour Technol 233:166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cazier EA, Trably E, Steyer JP, Escudié R (2015) Biomass hydrolysis inhibition at high hydrogen partial pressure in solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 190:106–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen TH (2011) Solid waste technology & management. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. De Baere L, Mattheeuws B (2012) Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Europe: status, experience and prospects. In: Thomé-Kozmiensky KJ, Thiel S (eds) Waste management: recycling and recovery, vol 3. pp 517–526. http://www.ows.be/es/publication/biogas-plants-publication-3/
  14. Demirel B, Scherer P (2008) The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review. Rev Environ Sci Bio 7:173–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-008-9131-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EPA (2015) SW-846 test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods, 3rd edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández J, Pérez M, Romero LI (2010) Kinetics of mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: influence of initial total solid concentration. Bioresour Technol 101:6322–6328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero LI (2008a) Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: dry thermophilic performance. Bioresour Technol 99:8180–8184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero LI (2008b) Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour Technol 99:6994–7002.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fricke K, Santen H, Wallmann R, Huttner A, Dichtl N (2007) Operating problems in anaerobic digestion plants resulting from nitrogen in MSW. Waste Manag 27:30–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Bernet D, Buffière P, Latrille E, Steyer J-P, Escudié R (2011) Water distribution in biowastes and digestates of dry anaerobic digestion technology. Chem Eng J 172:924–928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerardi MH (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. Wastewater microbiology series. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghimire A, Frunzo L, Pirozzi F, Trably E, Escudié R, Lens PNL, Esposito G (2015) A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: process parameters and use of by-products. Appl Energy 144:73–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holliger C et al (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74:2515–2522.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kothari R, Pandey AK, Kumar S, Tyagi VV, Tyagi SK (2014) Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:174–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahav O, Morgan BE, Loewenthal RE (2002) Rapid, simple, and accurate method for measurement of VFA and carbonate alkalinity in anaerobic reactors. Environ Sci Technol 36:2736–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liotta F et al (2014) Effect of total solids content on methane and volatile fatty acid production in anaerobic digestion of food waste. Waste Manag Res 32:947–953.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14550740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mancini G, Papirio S, Lens PNL, Esposito G (2018) Increased biogas production from wheat straw by chemical pretreatments Renew. Energ 119:608–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.045 Google Scholar
  28. Mata-Álvarez J (2003) Biomethanization of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. IWA Publishing, London.  https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780402994 Google Scholar
  29. Motte JC, Escudié R, Hamelin J, Steyer JP, Bernet N, Delgenes JP, Dumas C (2014) Substrate milling pretreatment as a key parameter for solid-state anaerobic digestion optimization. Bioresour Technol 173:185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noguerol-Arias J, Rodríguez-Abalde A, Romero-Merino E, Flotats X (2012) Determination of chemical oxygen demand in heterogeneous solid or semisolid samples using a novel method combining solid dilutions as a preparation step followed by optimized closed reflux and colorimetric measurement. Anal Chem 84:5548–5555.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3003566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pastor-Poquet V, Papirio S, Steyer J-P, Trably E, Escudié R, Esposito G (2018) High-solids anaerobic digestion model for homogenized reactors. Water Res 142:501–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pastor-Poquet V, Papirio S, Trably E, Rintala J, Escudié R, Esposito G (2019) Semi-continuous mono-digestion of OFMSW and co-digestion of OFMSW with beech sawdust: assessment of the maximum operational total solid content. J Environ Manag 231:1293–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prochazka J, Dolejs P, Maca J, Dohanyos M (2012) Stability and inhibition of anaerobic processes caused by insufficiency or excess of ammonia nitrogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:439–447.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3625-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riggio S, Torrijos M, Vives G, Esposito G, van Hullebusch ED, Steyer JP, Escudié R (2017) Leachate flush strategies for managing volatile fatty acids accumulation in leach-bed reactors. Bioresour Technol 232:93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schievano A, D’Imporzano G, Malagutti L, Fragali E, Ruboni G, Adani F (2010) Evaluating inhibition conditions in high-solids anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol 101:5728–5732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Staley BF, de Los Reyes III FL, Barlaz MA (2011) Effect of spatial differences in microbial activity, pH, and substrate levels on methanogenesis initiation in refuse. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2381–2391.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02349-10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valdez-Vazquez I, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2009) Alkalinity and high total solids affecting H2 production from organic solid waste by anaerobic consortia. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:3639–3646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vavilin VA, Fernández B, Palatsi J, Flotats X (2008) Hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic material: an overview. Waste Manage 28:939–951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu F, Wang ZW, Tang L, Li Y (2014) A mass diffusion-based interpretation of the effect of total solids content on solid-state anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 167:178–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly
  2. 2.LBE, Univ Montpellier, INRANarbonneFrance
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and BioengineeringTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  4. 4.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations