Efficiency of microbial fuel cells based on the sulfate reduction by lactate and glucose
- 51 Downloads
The influence of lactate and glucose, used as electron donors on the rate of sulfate reduction, electricity generation and microbial communities in anodic chamber of microbial fuel cells, was studied. Effective sulfate and chemical oxygen demand removal was achieved at different hydraulic retention times by the laboratory installations, consisting of anaerobic fixed-bed reactor and microbial fuel cell with air–cathode. The highest maximum power density of 349 mW/m2 was obtained in the lactate-fed microbial fuel cell under hydraulic retention time of 66 h. The type of electron donor had a great impact on the composition of the microbial community. The metagenomic data obtained showed that the most abundant phylum in both bacterial communities was Proteobacteria—67% and 46% when using lactate and glucose as an electron donor, respectively. Euryarchaeota was found in significant quantities (11.57%) in the microbial communities cultivated on lactate, whereas when using glucose, they were 0.01%. The bacterial community at glucose was characterized with the phyla belonging to Verrucomicrobia (15.11%) and Spirochaetes (17.26%). In both microbial communities in anodic chamber were presented sulfate-reducing bacteria that can incompletely oxidize the organic compound usually with acetate as an end product, as the dominant microbial species among sulfate-reducing bacteria was Desulfomicrobium baculatum (3.21%) in the microbial fuel cell at lactate, and Desulfovibrio mexicanus dominated (2.73%) in the microbial fuel cell at glucose.
KeywordsMicrobial fuel cell Sulfate reduction Microbial community Metagenomic analyses Wastewater treatment
This research was supported by the Bulgarian National Science Found, Grant No. DN 07/7, 15.12.2016.
- Brahmacharimayum B, Ghosh PK (2016) Effects of different environmental and operating conditions on sulfate bioreduction in shake flasks by mixed bacterial culture predominantly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Desalin Water Treat 57(38):17911–17921. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1087336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chai S, Gao L, Cai J (2012) Sulphate reduction optimization by sulphate-reducing bacteria in a glucose-fed anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A Energy Sci Res 29(1):201–208Google Scholar
- Chatterjee P, Ghangrekar MM, Rao S, Kumar S (2017) Biotic conversion of sulphate to sulphide and abiotic conversion of sulphide to sulphur in a microbial fuel cell using cobalt oxide octahedrons as cathode catalyst. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40(5):759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gao C, Wang A, Zhao Y (2014) Contribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria to the electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Adv Mater Res 1008–1009:285–289. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1008-1009.285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris J, McCartor A (2011) The top ten of the toxic twenty. The world’s worst toxic pollution problems. Blacksmith Institute and Green Cross Switzerland, New York, Zurich http://www.worstpolluted.org
- Kousi P, Remoundaki E, Hatzikioseyian A, Tsezos M (2011) Sulfate-redusing fixed-bed bioreactors fed with different organic substrates for metal precipitation. In: Biohydrometallurgy: biotechnology key to unlock mineral resources value, 18–22 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
- Maniatis T, Fritch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Moon C, Singh R, Veeravalli SS, Shanmugam SR, Chaganti SR, Lalman JA, Heath DD (2015) Effect of COD:SO4 2− ratio, HRT and linoleic acid concentration on mesophilic sulfate reduction: reactor performance and microbial population dynamics. Water 7:2275–2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar