Advertisement

Adsorptive removal of toluene from aqueous solution using metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr): removal optimization by response surface methodology

  • M. Heydari
  • S. Sabbaghi
  • S. Zeinali
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Toluene is a typical volatile organic compound present in petroleum, gasoline and industrial wastewater which has harmful effects on human health. In this study, metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr) was synthesized and used to remove toluene from aqueous solution. Synthesized MIL-101(Cr) was characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nitrogen adsorption–desorption techniques. We used experimental design methodology in order to develop a model for toluene removal and optimize the operational parameters. Effect of five operational parameters of temperature, contact time, adsorbent dosage, the initial concentration of toluene and pH was investigated on removal percentage. Toluene removal of 97% was achieved at the obtained optimum condition. The number of recycles that MIL-101(Cr) can be used without regeneration was investigated, and it was found that this adsorbent can be used for five successive recycles without regeneration or a significant decrease in removal percentage. According to the adsorption experiments, the adsorption of toluene on the MIL-101(Cr) was correlated well with the Freundlich isotherm model. The kinetics of the adsorption process was investigated and the result showed that kinetic data followed the pseudo-second-order model. Thermodynamic studies also showed that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic.

Keywords

Adsorption Design of experiments Porous material Volatile organic compounds Wastewater treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Drilling NanoFluid Laboratory, Shiraz University for supporting this project.

Supplementary material

13762_2019_2214_MOESM1_ESM.docx (677 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 676 kb)

References

  1. Abbas A, Abussaud BA, Ihsanullah, Al-Baghli NAH, Redhwi HH (2017) Adsorption of Toluene and Paraxylene from aqueous solution using pure and iron oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes: kinetics and isotherms study. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2017:11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2853925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aivalioti M, Papoulias P, Kousaiti A, Gidarakos E (2012) Adsorption of BTEX, MTBE and TAME on natural and modified diatomite. J Hazard Mater 207:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asadi F, Zerafat M (2016) Adsorption of toluene from aqueous solutions using clay-based nanostructures. Sep Sci Technol 51:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barea E, Montoro C, Navarro JA (2014) Toxic gas removal–metal–organic frameworks for the capture and degradation of toxic gases and vapours. Chem Soc Rev 43:5419–5430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharjee S, Chen C, Ahn W-S (2014) Chromium terephthalate metal–organic framework MIL-101: synthesis, functionalization, and applications for adsorption and catalysis. RSC Adv 4:52500–52525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dąbrowski A, Podkościelny P, Hubicki Z, Barczak M (2005) Adsorption of phenolic compounds by activated carbon—a critical review. Chemosphere 58:1049–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dou B, Hu Q, Li J, Qiao S, Hao Z (2011) Adsorption performance of VOCs in ordered mesoporous silicas with different pore structures and surface chemistry. J Hazard Mater 186:1615–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ertas IE, Gulcan M, Bulut A, Yurderi M, Zahmakiran M (2015) Rhodium nanoparticles stabilized by sulfonic acid functionalized metal–organic framework for the selective hydrogenation of phenol to cyclohexanone. J Mol Catal A Chem 410:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Férey G, Mellot-Draznieks C, Serre C, Millange F, Dutour J, Surblé S, Margiolaki I (2005) A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309:2040–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gui H, Li F, Wei Y, Yamada T (2018) Adsorption characteristics of natural organic matter on activated carbons with different pore size distribution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1619–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasan Z, Jhung SH (2015) Removal of hazardous organics from water using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): plausible mechanisms for selective adsorptions. J Hazard Mater 283:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henschel A, Gedrich K, Kraehnert R, Kaskel S (2008) Catalytic properties of MIL-101. Chem Commun 35:4192–4194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hindarso H, Ismadji S, Wicaksana F, Mudjijati A, Indraswati N (2001) Adsorption of benzene and toluene from aqueous solution onto granular activated carbon. J Chem Eng Data 46:788–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horcajada P, Serre C, Vallet-Regí M, Sebban M, Taulelle F, Férey G (2006) Metal–organic frameworks as efficient materials for drug delivery. Angew Chem 118:6120–6124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang Y-F, Liu M, Wang Y-Q, Li Y, Zhang J-M, Huo S-H (2016) Hydrothermal synthesis of functionalized magnetic MIL-101 for magnetic enrichment of estrogens in environmental water samples. RSC Adv 6:15362–15369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James SL (2003) Metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 32:276–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan NA, Hasan Z, Jhung SH (2013) Adsorptive removal of hazardous materials using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): a review. J Hazard Mater 244:444–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Response surfaces: designs and analyses, vol 152. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim K-J, Ahn H-G (2012) The effect of pore structure of zeolite on the adsorption of VOCs and their desorption properties by microwave heating. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 152:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim MJ et al (2011) Adsorption of pyridine onto the metal organic framework MIL-101. J Colloid Interface Sci 361:612–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar A et al (2017) Sustainable nano-hybrids of magnetic biochar supported g-C3N4/FeVO4 for solar powered degradation of noxious pollutants-synergism of adsorption, photocatalysis and photo-ozonation. J Clean Prod 165:431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar A et al (2018) Biochar-templated g-C3N4/Bi2O2CO3/CoFe2O4 nano-assembly for visible and solar assisted photo-degradation of paraquat, nitrophenol reduction and CO2 conversion. Chem Eng J 339:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J, Scheidt KA, Nguyen ST, Hupp JT (2009) Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38:1450–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li J-R, Kuppler RJ, Zhou H-C (2009) Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1477–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma S, Zhou H-C (2010) Gas storage in porous metal–organic frameworks for clean energy applications. Chem Commun 46:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirbagheri NS, Sabbaghi S (2018) A natural kaolin/γ-Fe2O3 composite as an efficient nano-adsorbent for removal of phenol from aqueous solutions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 259:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mirsoleimani-azizi SM, Setoodeh P, Samimi F, Shadmehr J, Hamedi N, Rahimpour MR (2018) Diazinon removal from aqueous media by mesoporous MIL-101 (Cr) in a continuous fixed-bed system. J Environ Chem Eng 6:4653–4664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikolajsen K, Kiwi-Minsker L, Renken A (2006) Structured fixed-bed adsorber based on zeolite/sintered metal fibre for low concentration VOC removal. Chem Eng Res Des 84:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Organization WH (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: recommendations, vol 1. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. Qian Y, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Chen J (2013) Performance and properties of nanoscale calcium peroxide for toluene removal. Chemosphere 91:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serra RM, Miró EE, Boix AV (2010) FTIR study of toluene adsorption on Cs-exchanged mordenites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 127:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shadmehr J, Mirsoleimani-azizi S, Zeinali S, Setoodeh P (2018) Electrocoagulation process for propiconazole elimination from wastewater: experimental design for correlative modeling and optimization. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1891-8 Google Scholar
  35. Shan R-R, Yan L-G, Yang K, Hao Y-F, Du B (2015) Adsorption of Cd (II) by Mg–Al–CO3-and magnetic Fe3O4/Mg–Al–CO3-layered double hydroxides: kinetic, isothermal, thermodynamic and mechanistic studies. J Hazard Mater 299:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma G, Thakur B, Naushad M, Ala’a H, Kumar A, Sillanpaa M, Mola GT (2017a) Fabrication and characterization of sodium dodecyl sulphate@ ironsilicophosphate nanocomposite: Ion exchange properties and selectivity for binary metal ions. Mater Chem Phys 193:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma G, Thakur B, Naushad M, Kumar A, Stadler FJ, Alfadul SM, Mola GT (2017b) Applications of nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical engineering and environmental protection. Environm Chem Lett 16:1–34Google Scholar
  38. Sharma G et al (2018a) Guar gum-crosslinked-Soya lecithin nanohydrogel sheets as effective adsorbent for the removal of thiophanate methyl fungicide. Int J Biol Macromol 114:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharma G et al (2018b) Fabrication and characterization of Gum arabic-cl-poly (acrylamide) nanohydrogel for effective adsorption of crystal violet dye. Carbohydr Polym 202:444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sivagurunathan M, Martin AM, Helleur RJ (2003) Biological waste-treatment of hydrocarbon residues: effects of humic acids on the degradation of toluene. Appl Energy 75:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Su F, Lu C, Hu S (2010) Adsorption of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and p-xylene by NaOCl-oxidized carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 353:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tian N, Jia Q, Su H, Zhi Y, Ma A, Wu J, Shan S (2016) The synthesis of mesostructured NH2-MIL-101 (Cr) and kinetic and thermodynamic study in tetracycline aqueous solutions. J Porous Mater 23:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yaghi OM, O’Keeffe M, Ockwig NW, Chae HK, Eddaoudi M, Kim J (2003) Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nanochemical Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Technologies, Nanotechnology Research InstituteShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations