Advertisement

Sulfamethoxazole removal by photocatalytic degradation utilizing TiO2 and WO3 nanoparticles as catalysts: analysis of various operational parameters

  • F. Beheshti
  • R. M. A. TehraniEmail author
  • A. Khadir
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Sulfamethoxazole is a commonly used antibiotic with the high potential for propagation of the antibiotic resistance genes in the environment which pose a serious health effect on human health. The present work deals with the treatment of sulfamethoxazole by employing photocatalytic degradation. TiO2 and WO3 nanoparticles were used as catalysts. The morphology and structure of catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. The effect of various operating parameters such as catalyst dosage, pH value, initial pollutant concentration, and irradiation source on the removal efficiency of sulfamethoxazole was investigated. It was found out that acidic medium is better for degradation of sulfamethoxazole and hence optimum pH value for UV/TiO2 and UV/WO3 were 4 and 3, respectively. The optimum dosage of TiO2 and WO3 was 500 and 750 mg/l that resulted in removal efficiency of 61.28% and 43.3%, respectively. The effect of initial concentration was also studied: increasing the sulfamethoxazole concentration from 25 to 100 mg/l caused a reduction in removal efficiency. Moreover, it was found that the highest activation of TiO2 was in the presence of UVC irradiation and WO3 in the presence of halogen lamps. Also, the removal of sulfamethoxazole from actual hospital wastewater was studied. The results indicated that photocatalytic degradation was still effective even if the removal efficiency was lowered. TOC analysis proved that although sulfamethoxazole was completely removed from the synthetic solution, secondary photostability pollutants were generated. The obtained results revealed that pseudo-first-order model best fitted experimental data at various irradiation sources considered.

Keywords

Pharmaceutical Photocatalysis Sulfamethoxazole Titanium dioxide Tungsten trioxide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors also would like to extend the acknowledgments to Islamic Azad University, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) Share Rey and West Tehran Branches.

References

  1. Adhikari S, Chandra KS, Kim D-H et al (2018) Understanding the morphological effects of WO3 photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants. Adv Powder Technol 29:1591–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Autin O, Hart J, Jarvis P et al (2012) Comparison of UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 for the degradation of metaldehyde: kinetics and the impact of background organics. Water Res 46:5655–5662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berglund F, Killander J, Pompeius R (1975) Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on the renal excretion of creatinine in man. J Urol 114:802–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boxall ABA, Rudd MA, Brooks BW et al (2012) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions? Environ Health Perspect 120:1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi J, Lee H, Choi Y et al (2014) Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of pharmaceutical micropollutants: effects of wastewater effluent matrix and catalyst modifications. Appl Catal B Environ 147:8–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou J-C, Liao LP (2005) Study on pH at the point of zero charge of TiO2 pH ion-sensitive field effect transistor made by the sputtering method. Thin Solid Films 476:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 48:53–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fakhri A, Behrouz S (2015) Photocatalytic properties of tungsten trioxide (WO3) nanoparticles for degradation of lidocaine under visible and sunlight irradiation. Sol Energy 112:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 9:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong H, Chu W (2016) Determination and toxicity evaluation of the generated products in sulfamethoxazole degradation by UV/CoFe2O4/TiO2. J Hazard Mater 314:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta VK, Atar N, Yola ML et al (2014) A novel magnetic Fe@Au core–shell nanoparticles anchored graphene oxide recyclable nanocatalyst for the reduction of nitrophenol compounds. Water Res 48:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta VK, Agarwal S, Olgun A et al (2016) Adsorptive properties of molasses modified boron enrichment waste based nanoclay for removal of basic dyes. J Ind Eng Chem 34:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He Y, Sutton NB, Rijnaarts HHH, Langenhoff AAM (2016) Degradation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater using immobilized TiO2 photocatalysis under simulated solar irradiation. Appl Catal B Environ 182:132–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inyinbor AA, Bello OS, Fadiji AE, Inyinbor HE (2017) Threats from antibiotics: a serious environmental concern. J Environ Chem Eng 6:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanakaraju D, Glass BD, Oelgemöller M (2018) Advanced oxidation process-mediated removal of pharmaceuticals from water: a review. J Environ Manag 219:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JR, Kan E (2016) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole in water using a biochar-supported TiO2 photocatalyst. J Environ Manag 180:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laffite A, Kilunga PI, Kayembe JM et al (2016) Hospital effluents are one of several sources of metal, antibiotic resistance genes, and bacterial markers disseminated in Sub-Saharan urban rivers. Front Microbiol 7:1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lai H-F, Chen C-C, Chang Y-K et al (2014) Efficient photocatalytic degradation of thiobencarb over BiVO4 driven by visible light: parameter and reaction pathway investigations. Sep Purif Technol 122:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Corre KS, Ort C, Kateley D et al (2012) Consumption-based approach for assessing the contribution of hospitals towards the load of pharmaceutical residues in municipal wastewater. Environ Int 45:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lekkerkerker-Teunissen K, Benotti MJ, Snyder SA, Van Dijk HC (2012) Transformation of atrazine, carbamazepine, diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole by low and medium pressure UV and UV/H2O2 treatment. Sep Purif Technol 96:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu G, Li X, Han B et al (2017) Efficient degradation of sulfamethoxazole by the Fe(II)/HSO5-process enhanced by hydroxylamine: efficiency and mechanism. J Hazard Mater 322:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyimo B, Buza J, Subbiah M et al (2016) IncF plasmids are commonly carried by antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from drinking water sources in northern Tanzania. Int J Microbiol 2016:3103672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahmoud WMM, Rastogi T, Kümmerer K (2017) Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a photocatalyst for the removal of micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals from water. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 6:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marti E, Variatza E, Balcazar JL (2014) The role of aquatic ecosystems as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Trends Microbiol 22:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohagheghian A, Karimi S-A, Yang J-K, Shirzad-Siboni M (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of a textile dye by illuminated tungsten oxide nanopowder. J Adv Oxid Technol 18:61–68Google Scholar
  26. Ren KJ, Liu Y, Xu JR et al (2016) Residues characteristics of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in the river sediments and fish tissues in a drinking water protection area of Guangdong Province. Acta Sci Circumst 36:760–766Google Scholar
  27. Santos LH, Gros M, Rodriguez-Mozaz S et al (2013) Contribution of hospital effluents to the load of pharmaceuticals in urban wastewaters: identification of ecologically relevant pharmaceuticals. Sci Total Environ 461:302–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shahbazi R, Payan A, Fattahi M (2018) Preparation, evaluations and operating conditions optimization of nano TiO2 over graphene based materials as the photocatalyst for degradation of phenol. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 364:564–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stenström T-A, Okoh AI, Adegoke AA (2016) Antibiogram of environmental isolates of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus from Nkonkobe Municipality, South Africa. Fresenius Environ Bull 25:3059–3065Google Scholar
  30. Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Galletti A et al (2012) Hospital effluent: investigation of the concentrations and distribution of pharmaceuticals and environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 430:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Jelic A et al (2014) Comparison of measured and predicted concentrations of selected pharmaceuticals in wastewater and surface water: a case study of a catchment area in the Po Valley (Italy). Sci Total Environ 470:844–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams MR, Stedtfeld RD, Guo X, Hashsham SA (2016) Antimicrobial resistance in the environment. Water Environ Res 88:1951–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xekoukoulotakis NP, Drosou C, Brebou C et al (2011) Kinetics of UV-A/TiO2 photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in aqueous matrices. Catal Today 161:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang J, Li Z, Zhu H (2017) Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole by a novel composite hydrogel with visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B Environ 217:603–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yola ML, Eren T, Atar N, Wang S (2014) Adsorptive and photocatalytic removal of reactive dyes by silver nanoparticle-colemanite ore waste. Chem Eng J 242:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang S, Fan Q, Gao H et al (2016) Formation of Fe3O4@ MnO2 ball-in-ball hollow spheres as a high performance catalyst with enhanced catalytic performances. J Mater Chem A 4:1414–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang S, Gao H, Li J et al (2017) Rice husks as a sustainable silica source for hierarchical flower-like metal silicate architectures assembled into ultrathin nanosheets for adsorption and catalysis. J Hazard Mater 321:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang S, Gao H, Huang Y et al (2018) Ultrathin gC3N4 nanosheets coupled with amorphous Cu-doped FeOOH nanoclusters as 2D/0D heterogeneous catalysts for water remediation. Environ Sci Nano 5:1179–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou A, Zhang Y, Li R et al (2016) Adsorptive removal of sulfa antibiotics from water using spent mushroom substrate, an agricultural waste. Desalin Water Treat 57:388–397Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, West Tehran BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Young Researcher and Elite Club, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) Share Rey BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations