Advertisement

Immobilization of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite thin layer on the glass tubes in a component parabolic collector for the treatment of DR23

  • L. Ghalamchi
  • M. H. Rasoulifard
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Photocatalysis driven by the natural solar light has been proved to be a favorable approach for the degradation of hazardous organic pollutants in water and wastewater. The present work addressed the removal of Direct Red 23 by the solar/Fe3O4/TiO2/S2O82− process. The application of the component parabolic collector, which served as a solar light concentrator, could improve the photocatalytic removal efficiency in the presence of immobilized Fe3O4/TiO2 nanoparticles. In this paper, the synthesis of Fe3O4/TiO2 photocatalyst to treat wastewater under solar radiation has been reported. Accordingly, a component parabolic collector solar photoreactor was designed and constructed for wastewater treatment processes. The prepared Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite was precipitated as a thin layer on the glass tubes of the solar photoreactor. The central composite experimental design was also used in order to optimize and model the CI Direct Red 23 decolorization process; then, the influence of operational parameters such as the contaminant concentration, S2O82− concentration, and the reaction time was investigated. Due to the solar/Fe3O4/TiO2/S2O82− process, 100% of Direct Red 23 could be removed in 90 min at the concentration of 15.16 mg L−1 and S2O82− concentration of 0.8 mM. The predicted response for the Direct Red 23 decolorization efficiency in the optimal condition was obtained to be 98.50%, which was in a good agreement with the experimental response (100%).

Keywords

Degradation Optimization Photocatalysis Photoreactor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aber S, Sheydaei M (2012) Removal of COD from industrial effluent containing indigo dye using adsorption method by activated carbon cloth: optimization, kinetic, and isotherm studies. Clean Soil Air Water 40:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amani-Ghadim AR, Aber S, Olad A, Ashassi-Sorkhabi H (2013) Optimization of electrocoagulation process for removal of an azo dye using response surface methodology and investigation on the occurrence of destructive side reactions. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 64:68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandala ER, Peláez MA, Salgado MJ, Torres L (2008) Degradation of sodium dodecyl sulphate in water using solar driven Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater 151:578–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnajady M, Modirshahla N, Hamzavi R (2006) Kinetic study on photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Acid yellow 23 by ZnO photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 133:226–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekkouche S, Mrouani S, Hamdaoui O, Bouhelassa M (2017) Efficient photocatalytic degradation of Safranin O by integrating solar-UV/TiO2/persulfate treatment: implication of sulfate radical in the oxidation process and effect of various water matrix components. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 345:80–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilal M, Rasheed T, Iqbal HM, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X (2018) Toxicological assessment and UV/TiO2-based induced degradation profile of reactive black 5 dye. Environ Manag 61(1):171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0948-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanco J, Malato S, Fernández P, Vidal A, Morales A, Trincado P, Oliveira JC, Minero C, Musci M, Casalle C, Brunotte M, Tratzky S, Dischinger N, Funken KH, Sattler C, Vincent M, Collares-Pereira M, Mendes JF, Rangel CM (1999) Compound parabolic concentrator technology development to commercial solar detoxification applications. Sol Energy 67:317–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00078-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerrato G, Bianchi CL, Galli F, Pirola C, Morandi S, Capucci V (2019) Micro-TiO2 coated glass surfaces safely abate drugs in surface water. J Hazard Mater 363:328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daneshvar N, Rasoulifard MH, Khataee AR, Hosseinzadeh F (2007) Removal of C.I. acid orange 7 from aqueous solution by UV irradiation in the presence of ZnO nanopowder. J Hazard Mater 143:95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du GH, Liu ZL, Xia X, Chu Q, Zhang SM (2006) Characterization and application of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanocomposites. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 39:285–291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-006-7780-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dükkancı M (2018) Sono-photo-Fenton oxidation of bisphenol-A over a LaFeO3 perovskite catalyst. Ultrason Sonochem 40:110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epold I, Dulova N (2015) Oxidative degradation of levofloxacin in aqueous solution by S2O8 2−/Fe2+, S2O8 2−/H2O2 and S2O8 2−/OH processes: a comparative study. J Environ Chem Eng 3:1207–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eskandarian MR, Fazli M, Rasoulifard MH, Choi H (2016) Decomposition of organic chemicals by zeolite-TiO2 nanocomposite supported onto low density polyethylene film under UV-LED powered by solar radiation. Appl Catal B Environ 183:407–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faisal M, Abu Tariq M, Muneer M (2007) Photocatalysed degradation of two selected dyes in UV-irradiated aqueous suspensions of titania. Dyes Pigments 72:233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghalamchi L, Rasoulifard MH, Seyed Dorraji MS, Pourata R (2017) Solar photocatalytic oxidation of an azo dye with immobilized TiO2/S2O8 2– in a component parabolic collector–reactor. Desalin Water Treat 81:223–232.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghaly MY, Härtel G, Mayer R, Haseneder R (2001) Photochemical oxidation of p-chlorophenol by UV/H2O2 and photo-Fenton process. A comparative study. Waste Manag 21:41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00070-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassan M, Zhao Y, Xie B (2016) Employing TiO2 photocatalysis to deal with landfill leachate: current status and development. Chem Eng J 285:264–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khaki MRD, Shafeeyan MS, Raman AAA, Daud WMAW (2018) Evaluating the efficiency of nano-sized Cu doped TiO2/ZnO photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. J Mol Liq 258:354–365.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khataee AR, Fathinia M, Aber S, Zarei M (2010) Optimization of photocatalytic treatment of dye solution on supported TiO2 nanoparticles by central composite design: intermediates identification. J Hazard Mater 181:886–897.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lv Y, Ding Y, Zhou J et al (2009a) Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of N, S-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Am Ceram Soc 92:938–941.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.02951.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lv Y, Yu L, Huang H et al (2009b) Preparation, characterization of P-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their excellent photocatalystic properties under the solar light irradiation. J Alloys Compds 488:314–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marandi R, Olya ME, Vahid B, Khosravi M, Hatami M (2012) Kinetic modeling of photocatalytic degradation of an azo dye using nano-TiO2/polyester. Environ Eng Sci 29:957–963.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2011.0266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Modirshahla N, Behnajady MA, Ghanbary F (2007) Decolorization and mineralization of CI acid yellow 23 by Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Dyes Pigments 73:305–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moncayo-Lasso A, Pulgarin C, Benítez N (2008) Degradation of DBPs’ precursors in river water before and after slow sand filtration by photo-Fenton process at pH 5 in a solar CPC reactor. Water Res 42:4125–4132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muruganandham M, Shobana N, Swaminathan M (2006) Optimization of solar photocatalytic degradation conditions of reactive yellow 14 azo dye in aqueous TiO2. J Mol Catal A Chem 246:154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.09.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakata K, Fujishima A (2012) TiO2 photocatalysis: design and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 13:169–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pirhashemi M, Habibi-Yangjeh A (2013) Simple and large scale one-pot method for preparation of AgBr–ZnO nanocomposites as highly efficient visible light photocatalyst. Appl Sur Sci 283:1080–1088.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prato-Garcia D, Vasquez-Medrano R, Hernandez-Esparza M (2009) Solar photoassisted advanced oxidation of synthetic phenolic wastewaters using ferrioxalate complexes. Sol Energy 83:306–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rasouli F, Aber S, Salari D, Khataee AR (2014) Optimized removal of reactive navy blue SP-BR by organo-montmorillonite based adsorbents through central composite design. Appl Clay Sci 87:228–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saien J, Shafiei H, Amisama A (2017) Photo-activated periodate in homogeneous degradation and mineralization of quinoline: optimization, kinetic, and energy consumption. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:1621–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sciacca F, Rengifo-Herrera JA, Wéthé J, Pulgarin C (2011) Solar disinfection of wild Salmonella sp. in natural water with a 18L CPC photoreactor: detrimental effect of non-sterile storage of treated water. Sol Energy 85:1399–1408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shahadat M, Teng TT, Rafatullah M, Arshad M (2015) Titanium-based nanocomposite materials: a review of recent advances and perspectives. Colloids Surf B 126:121–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheydaei M, Aber S, Khataee A (2014) Degradation of amoxicillin in aqueous solution using nanolepidocrocite chips/H2O2/UV: optimization and kinetics studies. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1772–1778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolfrum EJ, Huang J, Blake DM et al (2002) Photocatalytic oxidation of bacteria, bacterial and fungal spores, and model biofilm components to carbon dioxide on titanium dioxide-coated surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 36:3412–3419.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es011423j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu S, Sun A, Zhai F, Wang J, Xu W, Zhang Q, Volinsky AA (2011) Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles synthesis from tailings by ultrasonic chemical co-precipitation. Mater Lett 65:1882–1884.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang M, Thompson DW, Meyer GJ (2000) Dual pathways for TiO2 sensitization by Na2[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]. Inorg Chem 39:3738–3739.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic000415l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yousef A, Barakat NAM, Amna T et al (2012) Influence of CdO-doping on the photoluminescence properties of ZnO nanofibers: effective visible light photocatalyst for waste water treatment. J Lumin 132:1668–1677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.02.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zamiri R, Singh B, Bdikin I et al (2014) Influence of Mg doping on dielectric and optical properties of ZnO nano-plates prepared by wet chemical method. Solid State Commun 195:74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhan J, Zhang H, Zhu G (2014) Magnetic photocatalysts of cenospheres coated with Fe3O4/TiO2 core/shell nanoparticles decorated with Ag nanopartilces. Ceram Int 40:8547–8559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.01.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water and Wastewater Treatment Research Laboratory, Department of ChemistryUniversity of ZanjanZanjanIran

Personalised recommendations