Advertisement

Source apportionment and health risk assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds in primary schools in Northern Taiwan

  • D. R. Widiana
  • Y. C. WangEmail author
  • S. J. You
  • Y. F. Wang
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

This study conducted a source apportionment and health risk estimation of ambient volatile organic compounds in Taoyuan and Zhongli (Taiwan) primary schools. In particular, principal component analysis followed by absolute principal component scores was used in order to identify and quantify the emission sources of volatile organic compounds. Health risk was determined on the basis of age group and gender using the method recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Monte Carlo simulation was applied to analyze uncertainty and sensitivity. Results revealed that solvent usage in household product industries (56%) had the highest contribution of volatile organic compounds in Taoyuan and was followed by solvent usage in electronics manufacturing (27%) and oil refineries and storage leaks (17%). The main volatile organic compounds sources in Zhongli were vehicle emissions (48%) and liquefied petroleum gas/natural gas leakage (52%). Vehicle emissions and solvent usage in electronics manufacturing and household product industries were revealed as the primary sources of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, which were considered the compounds with high health risk for residents. The mean cumulative value of cancer risk ranged from 5.45 × 10−7 to 3.05 × 10−4, and the non-carcinogenic risk index for all age groups and genders was less than 1. The mean cumulative cancer risk was categorized as follows: below the limit recommended by United States Environmental Protection Agency, possible risk, probable risk, and definite risk. The magnitude of risks varied among age groups and between genders, and the variations in risk were statistically insignificant.

Keywords

Ambient volatile organic compound Cancer risk Source apportionment Primary school 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Science Council and Ministry of Science and Technology (NSC 99-2221-E-033-052, NSC 102-2621-M-033-001, MOST 103-2621-M-033-001, and MOST 103-2633-M-033-002) of Taiwan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Supplementary material

13762_2018_2157_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2926 kb)

References

  1. Bakó-Biró Z, Clements-Croome DJ, Kochhar N, Awbi HB, Williams MJ (2012) Ventilation rates in schools and pupils’ performance. Build Environ 48:215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake DR, Rowland FS (1995) Urban leakage of liquefied petroleum gas and its impact on Mexico city air quality. Science 269:953–956.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5226.953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bono R, Scursatone E, Schilirò T, Gilli G (2003) Ambient air levels and occupational exposure to benzene Toluene, and Xylenes in Northwestern Italy. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 66:519–531.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390306357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang T-Y et al (2010) Characterization of volatile organic compounds in the vicinity of an optoelectronics industrial park in Taiwan. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 60:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.1.55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen C-L, Fang H-Y, Shu C-M (2006) Mapping and profile of emission sources for airborne volatile organic compounds from process regions at a petrochemical plant in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:824–833.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng I, Xu X, Zhang L (2015) Overview of receptor-based source apportionment studies for speciated atmospheric mercury. Atmos Chem Phys 15:5493–5536.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-5493-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng J-H, Hsieh M-J, Chen K-S (2017) Characteristics and source apportionment of ambient volatile organic compounds in a Science Park in Central Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 16:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.02.0114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu K-H, Wu B-Z, Chang C-C, Sree U, Lo J-G (2005) Distribution of volatile organic compounds over a semiconductor Industrial Park in Taiwan environmental. Environ Sci Technol 39:973–983.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es049110m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai H, Jing S, Wang H, Ma Y, Li L, Song W, Kan H (2017) VOC characteristics and inhalation health risks in newly renovated residences in Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ 577:73–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demirel G, Özden Ö, Döğeroğlu T, Gaga EO (2014) Personal exposure of primary school children to BTEX, NO2 and ozone in Eskişehir, Turkey: relationship with indoor/outdoor concentrations and risk assessment. Sc Total Environ 473–474:537–548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Methyl ethyl ketone (2-butanone). EPA. http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/methyl-ethyl-ketone.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018
  12. Finlayson-Pitts B, Pitts J Jr (2000) Chemistry of the upper and lower atmosphere: theory, experiments and applications, 1st edn. Academic Press, Florida, pp 871–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gholizadeh MH, Melesse AM, Reddi L (2016) Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources using APCS-MLR and PMF receptor modeling techniques in three major rivers of South Florida. Sci Total Environ 566–567:1552–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo H, Wang T, Louie PKK (2004) Source apportionment of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Hong Kong. Environ Pollut 129:489–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2003.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo H, Wang T, Blake DR, Simpson IJ, Kwok YH, Li YS (2006) Regional and local contributions to ambient non-methane volatile organic compounds at a polluted rural/coastal site in Pearl River Delta, China. Atmos Environ 40:2345–2359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo H, So KL, Simpson IJ, Barletta B, Meinardi S, Blake DR (2007) C1–C8 volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Hong Kong: overview of atmospheric processing and source apportionment. Atmos Environ 41:1456–1472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han X, Naeher LP (2006) A review of traffic-related air pollution exposure assessment studies in the developing world. Environ Int 32:106–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haney JT, Phillips T, Sielken RL, Valdez-Flores C (2015) Development of an inhalation unit risk factor for isoprene. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73:712–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho KF, Lee SC, Guo H, Tsai WY (2004) Seasonal and diurnal variations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ 322:155–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang C-H, Chen K-S, Wang H-K (2012) Measurements and PCA/APCS analyses of volatile organic compounds in Kaohsiung municipal sewer systems, Southern Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:1315–1326.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.02.0035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IFC (2007) International Finance Corporation. Environmental, health, and safety guidelines for semiconductors and other electronics manufacturing. World Bank. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/bc321500488558d4817cd36a6515bb18/Final+-+Semiconductors+and+Other+Electronic+Mnfg.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 1 Feb 2018
  22. Indiana Department of Environmental Management (2018) Dichloromethane. IDEM Indianapolis. http://www.in.gov/idem/toxic/files/studies_toxwatch_dichloromethane.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018
  23. Inoue K, Nomura M (2016) The neuropathology of drug addictions and substance misuse. Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800634-4.00063-9 Google Scholar
  24. IRIS (2017) Integrated risk information system USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/iris. Accessed 18 May 2017
  25. Jung J-H, Choi B-W, Kim M-H, Baek S-O, Lee G-W, Shon B-H (2012) The characteristics of the appearance and health risks of volatile organic compounds in industrial (Pohang, Ulsan) and non-industrial (Gyeongju) areas. Environ Health Toxicol 27:e2012012.  https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.2012.27.e2012012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madureira J, Paciência I, Rufo J, Severo M, Ramos E, Barros H, de Oliveira Fernandes E (2016) Source apportionment of CO2, PM10 and VOCs levels and health risk assessment in naturally ventilated primary schools in Porto, Portugal. Build Environ 96:198–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.11.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masih A, Lall AS, Taneja A, Singhvi R (2016) Inhalation exposure and related health risks of BTEX in ambient air at different microenvironments of a terai zone in north India. Atmos Environ 147:55–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2008) Exposure factors for general population in Taiwan. Health Promotion Administration MOHW, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  29. Miri M et al (2016) Investigation of outdoor BTEX: concentration, variations, sources, spatial distribution, and risk assessment. Chemosphere 163:601–609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohai P, Kweon BS, Lee S, Ard K (2011) Air pollution around schools is linked to poorer student health and academic performance. Health Aff 30:852–862.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pallant J (2013) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows, 3rd edn. Open University Press, BekshireGoogle Scholar
  32. Sexton K, Linder SH, Marko D, Bethel H, Lupo PJ (2007) Comparative assessment of air pollution-related health risks in Houston. Environ Health Perspect.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10043 Google Scholar
  33. Sharma UK, Kajii Y, Akimoto H (2000) Characterization of NMHCs in downtown urban center Kathmandu and rural site Nagarkot in Nepal. Atmos Environ 34:3297–3307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00485-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh D, Kumar A, Kumar K, Singh B, Mina U, Singh BB, Jain VK (2016) Statistical modeling of O3, NOx, CO, PM2.5, VOCs and noise levels in commercial complex and associated health risk assessment in an academic institution. Sci Total Environ 572:586–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sofuoglu SC, Aslan G, Inal F, Sofuoglu A (2011) An assessment of indoor air concentrations and health risks of volatile organic compounds in three primary schools. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214:36–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Twardella D et al (2012) Effect of classroom air quality on students’ concentration: results of a cluster-randomized cross-over experimental study. Indoor Air 22:378–387.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00774.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang Y-C, Lin C, Lin Y-K, Wang Y-F, Weng W-H, Kuo Y-M (2016) Characteristics and determinants of ambient volatile organic compounds in primary schools. Environ Sci Process Impacts 18:1458–1468.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00491a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson JG, Chow JC, Fujita EM (2001) Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmos Environ 35:1567–1584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)0046-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou J, Bai Z, Zhang N (2011) Health risk assessment of personal exposure to volatile organic compounds in Tianjin, China. Epidemiology 22:S189.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000392261.49476.6c CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringChung Yuan Christian UniversityZhongliTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental EngineeringChung Yuan Christian UniversityZhongliTaiwan
  3. 3.Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya (Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya)SurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations