Selective metal accumulation by metal-resistant bacteria growing on spent engine oil in single and ternary metal mixtures
- 15 Downloads
Three metal-resistant bacteria species, identified as Pseudomonas alcaligenes B101, Pseudomonas fluorescens C101 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia E103, isolated from spent engine oil-contaminated tropical soils utilised spent engine oil (SEO) as a source of nutrient for growth in the presence of Pb2+ (500 µg/ml), Cu2+ (400 µg/ml) and Zn2+ (400 µg/ml) with concomitant cellular accumulation of the metals in single and ternary mixtures. Degradation of SEO in the presence of the metals and their mixture within a 21 days experimental period ranged between 27.8 and 57.8% compared to 52.2% and 66.7% in metal free controls with extensive modification (up to 92.7%) of the aromatic fractions of the spent oil. Cellular accumulation of the metals during SEO degradation ranged between 0.13 and 30.76%, and 3.77% and 33.43%, respectively, in growth media supplemented with single metal ions and their mixtures. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia E103 showed the best potential for metal uptake, accumulating the highest concentration of Pb2+ (29.0%) and Zn2+ (30.8%) in systems supplemented with single metals, while P. alcaligenes B101 and P. fluorescens C101 showed preference for the accumulation of Pb2+ (15.1%) and Cu2+ (23.8%), respectively. Although metal uptake decreased significantly in ternary metal systems, strains B101 and E103 maintained their preferences for Pb2+ in the ternary systems. The ability of these bacteria to metabolise spent engine oil with concurrent intracellular metal accumulation in the presence of high concentrations of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ and their mixtures highlighted their potentials for use in the remediation of sites exposed to hydrocarbon-metal co-contamination.
KeywordsBiodegradation Heavy metal bio-uptake Pseudomonas Stenotrophomonas
We are grateful to the owners of the ARGs who allowed sample collection from their workshops and to Mr Femi Babalola of the Department of Chemistry and the Basel Convention Centre, the University of Ibadan who assisted in interpreting the GC-FID data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1995) Annual book of ASTM standards, designation D4972-95a: standard test method for pH of soils. ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
- APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water 20th American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- ATSDR (1997) Public health statements: used mineral based crankcase oil. ATSDR, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- Hanlon Jr. EA (2015) Soil pH and electrical conductivity: a county extension soil laboratory manual. University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension Paper CIR1081. Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. Accessed 3 Sept 2014
- Fagundes-Klen MR, Vaz LGL, Veit MT, Borba CE, Silva EA, Kroumov AD (2007) Biosorption of the copper and cadmium ions—a study through adsorption isotherms analysis. Bioautomation 7:23–33Google Scholar
- Franҫois F, Lombard C, Guigner JM, Soreau P, Brian-Jaisson F, Martino G, Vandervennet M, Garcia D, Molinier AL, Peducci J, Zirah S, Rebuffat S (2012) Isolation and characterization of environmental bacteria capable of extracellular biosorption of mercury. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1097–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakajima A, Sakaguchi T (1986) Selective accumulation of heavy metals by microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 24:59–64Google Scholar
- National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) (2011) National environmental (surface and ground-water quality control) regulations (S.I. 22 of 2011)Google Scholar
- Onojake MC, Osuji LC (2012) Assessment of the physicochemical properties of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Arch Appl Sci Res 4(4):48–58Google Scholar
- Sneath PHA (1996) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. William and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (1990) Acid digestion of sediments, sludge and soils. USEPA SW-S846; Ch 3.2 Method 3050 A; US Environmental Protection Agency. Government Print Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (1996) Recycling used oil: what can you do? Cooperation extension services ENRI 317:1–2Google Scholar
- USEPA (2011) Priority pollutants. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/pollutants.cfm. Accessed 27 Aug 2015