Results on the implementation of an innovative dehydrated biological waste to ethanol management scheme

  • A. SotiropoulosEmail author
  • G. Xydis
  • N. Kontogianni
  • S. Vakalis
Short Communication


The results of the 2 years of operation of a dehydrated biological waste to ethanol management and treatment scheme are presented within the context of this work. This state-of-the-art and innovative biological waste management scheme was implemented in two major Greek Municipalities. The purity level of the incoming material was almost 100% w/w (99.99% w/w), while a significant variation in the biological waste material properties has also been recorded not only between seasons but also on a yearly basis. The results also revealed that the average energy consumption of the waste dryer was found to be 0.9 kW h/kg, while it ranged between 0.89 and 0.91 kW h/kg. The mass reduction achieved was 82% w/w, while the maximum ethanol production without the use of further additives was 11.5% w/w which is considered to be a worth to further optimize performance. The use of commercialized enzyme products under specific conditions has revealed that almost 90% w/w of the starch, 50% and 40% w/w of the cellulose and hemicellulose, respectively, have the potential to be converted into sugars in order to be further treated for ethanol production.


Waste management Drying Biofuels Bioeconomy 



This work has been elaborated in the framework of the LIFE + project entitled: Development and demonstration of an innovative method of converting waste into bioethanol, Waste2Bio (LIFE 11 ENV/GR/000949, 2012–2016), which is co-financed by the European Commission. The authors would also like to thank Novozymes Corporation for generously providing the enzyme samples used for the operation of the bioconversion facility, Vekkos Recycling Solutions for providing the decentralized biomass dryer for the needs of this research and Leaf Technologies for providing the yeast (Ethanol Red) samples for the fermentation process.


  1. Alamanou DG, Malamis D, Mamma D, Dimitris Kekos D (2015) Bioethanol from dried household food waste applying non-isothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation at high substrate concentration. Waste Biomass Valoriz 6:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis. In: Helirich K (ed) Association of official analytical chemists, 16th edn. AOAC, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Dogaris I, Karapati S, Mamma D, Kalogeris E, Kekos D (2009) Hydrothermal processing and enzymatic hydrolysis of sorghum bagasse for fermentable carbohydrates production. Bioresour Technol 100:6543–6549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EC (2015) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Accessed 20 May 2017
  5. Eurostat (2017) Waste data base municipal waste Accessed 20 May 2017
  6. Favoino E (2003) Source segregation of biowaste in Italy. In: Pres. No. 07. ECN/ORBIT e.V. Source Separation Workshop 2003Google Scholar
  7. Gibbs A, Hogg D (2007) Managing biowastes from households in the UK: applying life-cycle thinking in the framework of cost-benefit analysis. Eunomia research & consulting Ltd., BristolGoogle Scholar
  8. Gwak IS, Hwang JH, Sohn JM, Lee SH (2017) Economic evaluation of domestic biowaste to ethanol via a fluidized bed gasifier. J Ind Eng Chem 47:391–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017) IEA Statistics © OECD/IEA 2014. Accessed 19 May 2017
  10. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016) Factsheet. Accessed 19 May 2017
  11. IPCC (1997) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse inventories. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Tréanton K, Mamaty I, Bonduki Y, Griggs DJ, Callander BA (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). IPCC/OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Loizidou M, Alamanou DG, Sotiropoulos A, Christos L, Mamma D, Malamis D, Kekos D (2017) Pilot scale system of two horizontal rotating bioreactors for bioethanol production from household food waste at high solid concentrations. Waste Biomass Valoriz. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malamis D, Moustakas K, Bourka A, Valta K, Papadaskalopoulou C, Panaretou V, Skiadi O, Sotiropoulos A (2016) Compositional analysis of food waste from study sites in Greek municipalities. Waste Biomass Valoriz 6:637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Man HL, Beher SK, Park HS (2010) Optimization of operational parameters for ethanol production from Korean food waste leachate. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsakas L, Kekos D, Loizidou M, Christakopoulos P (2014) Utilization of household food waste for the production of ethanol at high dry material content. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moon HC, Song IS, Kim JC, Shirai Y, Lee DH, Kim JK, Chung SO, Kim DH, Oh KK, Cho YS (2009) Enzymatic hydrolysis of food waste and ethanol fermentation. Int J Energy Res 33:164–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rättö M, Vikman M, Siika-Aho M (2009) Utilization of municipal waste in biorefinery [Yhdyskuntajätteen hyödyntäminen biojalostamossa]. VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus (2494), pp 1–64Google Scholar
  18. REN21 (2016) Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. Accessed 17 May 2017
  19. Sadin SR, Povinelli FP, Rosen R (1988) The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems, presented at the IAF. In: International astronautical congress, 39th, Bangalore, India, Oct 8–15Google Scholar
  20. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz RO, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D (2004) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. In: Biomass analysis technology team laboratory analytical procedure. Department of Energy, pp 1–14, NREL/TP-510-42618.
  21. Sotiropoulos A, Malamis D, Loizidou M (2015) Dehydration of domestic food waste at source as an alternative approach for food waste management. Waste Biomass Valoriz. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sotiropoulos A, Vourka I, Erotokritou A, Novakovic J, Panaretou V, Vakalis S, Thanos T, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2016) Combination of decentralized waste drying and SSF techniques for household biowaste minimization and ethanol production. Waste Manag 52:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Wyk JPH (2001) Biotechnology and the utilization of biowaste as a resource for bioproduct development. Trends Biotechnol 19(5):172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Werpy T, Petersen G (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass: volume I—results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. United States.
  25. World Bank (2012) A global review of solid waste management (No. 15). Urban Development & Local Government Unit. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Business Development and TechnologyAarhus UniversityHerningDenmark

Personalised recommendations