Advertisement

Application of three nanoparticles (Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2) for metal-contaminated soil remediation (measuring and modeling)

  • E. Naderi Peikam
  • M. Jalali
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The immobilization of zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd) and nickel (Ni) using nanoparticles (NPs) was investigated. Two non-calcareous and calcareous contaminated soils were incubated with Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 at 1 and 3% wt for 30 days at 25 °C in field capacity moisture and then were fractionated by the sequential extraction procedure. After application of NPs, a significant increase in metals was observed in residual (RES) fraction. The maximum reduction in exchangeable (EXC) Cd fraction was measured in soil treated with 1% Al2O3 (38.3%) and 3% SiO2 (56.1%) for non-calcareous and calcareous soils, respectively. The highest decrease in EXC Zn fraction in non-calcareous and calcareous soils was 28.8% for Al2O3 (3%) and 57.1% TiO2 (3%) treatments, respectively. Interestingly, non-calcareous soil showed a higher capacity to reduce Ni in available fractions and it decreased on average by 14.0% and 11.0% for non-calcareous and calcareous soils, respectively. In general, SiO2 NPs were an effective sorbent for immobilizing three metals in calcareous soils, while in non-calcareous soils the maximum reduction in mobile fraction of Cd and Zn occurred in the presence of Al2O3 NPs, and the shift from mobile to stable fractions of Ni was higher in soils containing SiO2 NPs. Similar to experimental data, the model predicted that NPs could reduce metal in EXC, carbonate (CAR), oxide (OX) and organically bound (OR) fractions. Results suggested that NPs can be effectively used for metal immobilization in multi-metal-contaminated soils and that surface complexation modeling (PHREEQC) could describe different fractions of metal in soils.

Keywords

Calcareous soils Metals Multi-contaminated soils Nanoxides Surface complexation modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, where this research was conducted.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_2134_MOESM1_ESM.docx (413 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 413 kb)
13762_2018_2134_MOESM2_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Ali I (2012) New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chem Rev 112:5073–5091.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300133d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali I, Gupta VK (2007) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali I, Jain CK (2004) Advances in arsenic speciation techniques. Int J Environ Anal Chem 84:947–964.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067310410001729637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali I, Aboul-Enein H, Cazes J (2006) Instrumental methods in metal ion speciation. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali I, Asim M, Khan TA (2013) Arsenite removal from water by electro-coagulation on zinc–zinc and copper–copper electrodes. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:377–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0113-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali I, Alothman ZA, Sanagi MM (2015) Green synthesis of iron nano-impregnated adsorbent for fast removal of fluoride from water. J Mol Liq 211:457–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Al-Warthan A (2016a) Removal of secbumeton herbicide from water on composite nanoadsorbent. Desalin Water Treat 57:10409–10421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1041164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ali I, Alothman Z, Al-Warthan A (2016b) Sorption, kinetics and thermodynamics studies of atrazine herbicide removal from water using iron nano-composite material. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ali I, Alharbi OML, Alothman ZA, Badjah AY, Alwarthan A, Basheer AA (2018) Artificial neural network modelling of amido black dye sorption on iron composite nano material: kinetics and thermodynamics studies. J Mol Liq 250:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barman M, Datta S, Rattan R, Meena M (2015) Chemical fractions and bioavailability of nickel in alluvial soils Plant Soil. Environment 61:17–22Google Scholar
  11. Basheer AA (2018) Chemical chiral pollution: impact on the society and science and need of the regulations in the 21(st) century. Chirality 30:402–406.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.22808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben-Moshe A, Maoz BM, Govorov AO, Markovich G (2013) Chirality and chiroptical effects in inorganic nanocrystal systems with plasmon and exciton resonances. Chem Soc Rev 42:7028–7041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boily J-F, Fein JB (1996) Experimental study of cadmium-citrate co-adsorption onto ?-Al2O3. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60(16):2929–2938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boparai HK, Joseph M, O’Carroll DM (2013) Cadmium (Cd(2 +)) removal by nano zerovalent iron: surface analysis, effects of solution chemistry and surface complexation modeling. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:6210–6221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1651-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradl HB (2004) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buekers J, Van Laer L, Amery F, Van Buggenhout S, Maes A, Smolders E (2007) Role of soil constituents in fixation of soluble Zn, Cu, Ni and Cd added to soils. Eur J Soil Sci 58:1514–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burakova EA et al (2018) Novel and economic method of carbon nanotubes synthesis on a nickel magnesium oxide catalyst using microwave radiation. J Mol Liq 253:340–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen H, Dai G, Zhao J, Zhong A, Wu J, Yan H (2010) Removal of copper (II) ions by a biosorbent—Cinnamomum camphora leaves powder. J Hazard Mater 177:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis J, Kent D (1990) Surface complexation modeling in aqueous geochemistry. Rev Mineral Geochem 23:177–260Google Scholar
  20. Dehghani MH, Sanaei D, Ali I, Bhatnagar A (2016) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using treated waste newspaper as a low-cost adsorbent: kinetic modeling and isotherm studies. J Mol Liq 215:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delolme C, Hébrard-Labit C, Spadini L, Gaudet J-P (2004) Experimental study and modeling of the transfer of zinc in a low reactive sand column in the presence of acetate. J Contam Hydrol 70(3–4):205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dove PM, Rimstidt JD (1994) Silica–water interactions. Rev Mineral Geochem 29:259–308Google Scholar
  23. Feizi M, Jalali M, Renella G (2018) Nanoparticles and modified clays influenced distribution of heavy metals fractions in a light-textured soil amended with sewage sludges. J Hazard Mater 343:208–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galán E, Gómez-Ariza JL, González I, Fernández-Caliani JC, Morales E, Giráldez I (2003) Heavy metal partitioning in river sediments severely polluted by acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Appl Geochem 18:409–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00092-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaskova OL, Bukaty MB, Shironosova GP, Kabannik VG (2009) Thermodynamic model for sorption of bivalent heavy metals on calcite in natural-technogenic environments. Russ Geol Geophys 50(2):87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gil-Díaz M, Lobo MC (2018) Phytotoxicity of nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) in remediation strategies. In: Faisal M, Saquib Q, Alatar AA, Al-Khedhairy AA (eds) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Springer, Cham, pp 301–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76708-6_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gil-Díaz M, Pérez-Sanz A, Angeles Vicente M, Carmen Lobo M (2014) Immobilisation of Pb and Zn in soils using stabilised zero-valent iron nanoparticles: effects on soil properties. CLEAN Soil Air Water 42:1776–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gil-Díaz M, Diez-Pascual S, González A, Alonso J, Rodríguez-Valdés E, Gallego JR, Lobo MC (2016) A nanoremediation strategy for the recovery of an As-polluted soil. Chemosphere 149:137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gil-Díaz M, Pinilla P, Alonso J, Lobo MC (2017) Viability of a nanoremediation process in single or multi-metal(loid) contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 321:812–819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gil-Díaz M, López LF, Alonso J, Lobo MC (2018) Comparison of nanoscale zero-valent iron, compost, and phosphate for Pb immobilization in an acidic soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3972-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruebel KA, Leckie JO, Davis JA (1988) The feasibility of using sequential extraction techniques for arsenic and selenium in soils and sediments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta VK, Ali I (2012) Environmental water: advances in treatment, remediation and recycling. Newnes, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayes KF, Redden G, Ela W, Leckie JO (1991) Surface complexation models: an evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data. J Colloid Interface Sci 142(2):448–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoecke KV et al (2009) Fate and effects of CeO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Technol 43:4537–4546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hubbard AT (2002) Encyclopedia of surface and colloid science. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Jalali M, Moradi F (2013) Competitive sorption of Cd, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in polluted and unpolluted calcareous soils. Environ Monit Assess 185:8831–8846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu J, Shipley HJ (2012) Evaluation of desorption of Pb (II), Cu (II) and Zn (II) from titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 431:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keon N, Swartz C, Brabander D, Harvey C, Hemond H (2001) Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 35:2778–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laflamme Y (1968) Determination of free silica in soils by atomic absorption spectrophotometry vol 7Google Scholar
  40. Lei M, Liao Bh, Qr Zeng, Pf Qin, Khan S (2008) Fraction distributions of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in metal-contaminated soil before and after extraction with disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 39:1963–1978.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802134776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levard C et al (2009) Role of natural nanoparticles on the speciation of Ni in andosols of la Reunion. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:4750–4760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li X, Thornton I (2001) Chemical partitioning of trace and major elements in soils contaminated by mining and smelting activities. Appl Geochem 16:1693–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liao B-h, Liu H-y, Zeng Q-r, Yu P-z, Probst A, Probst J-L (2005) Complex toxic effects of Cd2+, Zn2+, and acid rain on growth of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environ Int 31:891–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu L, Lai M, Zhang S (1997) Diffusion in mechanical alloying. J Mater Process Technol 67:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Madeley JD, Richmond RC (1972) A procedure for determining the concentration of Hydroxyl Groups on Silica Surfaces. Z Anorg Allg Chem 389(1):92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahdavi S, Jalali M, Afkhami A (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mallampati SR, Mitoma Y, Okuda T, Sakita S, Kakeda M (2013) Total immobilization of soil heavy metals with nano-Fe/Ca/CaO dispersion mixtures. Environ Chem Lett 11:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martı́nez CE, Jacobson AR, McBride MB (2003) Aging and temperature effects on DOC and elemental release from a metal contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 122:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McBride M (1989) Reactions controlling heavy metal solubility in soils. In: Advances in soil science. Springer, pp 1–56Google Scholar
  50. Meher AK, Das S, Rayalu S, Bansiwal A (2016) Enhanced arsenic removal from drinking water by iron-enriched aluminosilicate adsorbent prepared from fly ash. Desalin Water Treat 57:20944–20956.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1112311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mehra O, Jackson M (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite–citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. In: Clays and clay minerals: proceedings of the Seventh National Conference, 1960. Elsevier, pp 317–327Google Scholar
  52. Miller GP (2001) Surface complexation modeling of arsenic in natural water and sediment systems. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  53. Monterroso C, Rodríguez F, Chaves R, Diez J, Becerra-Castro C, Kidd PS, Macías F (2014) Heavy metal distribution in mine-soils and plants growing in a Pb/Zn-mining area in NW Spain. Appl Geochem 44:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montinaro S, Concas A, Pisu M, Cao G (2007) Remediation of heavy metals contaminated soils by ball milling. Chemosphere 67:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moral R, Gilkes RJ, JordÁn MM (2005) Distribution of heavy metals in calcareous and non-calcareous soils in Spain. Water Air Soil Pollut 162:127–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-5997-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mueller NC, Nowack B (2010) Nanoparticles for remediation: solving big problems with little particles. Elements 6:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Naderi Peikam E, Jalali M (2017) Measuring and modeling metal ions adsorption on αAl2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles in the presence of organic ligands. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1569-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peikam EN, Jalali M (2017) Potential release of metals from tailings and soil at the Hamekasi Iron Mine, Hamadan, Iran. Mine Water Environ 36:180–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-016-0425-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Qafoku NP (2010a) Chapter Two—Terrestrial nanoparticles and their controls on soil-/geo-processes and reactions. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 107. Academic Press, London, pp 33–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)07002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Qafoku NP (2010b) Terrestrial nanoparticles and their controls on soil-/geo-processes and reactions. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 107. Elsevier, pp 33–91Google Scholar
  61. Ramos L, Hernandez LM, Gonzalez MJ (1994) Sequential fractionation of copper, lead, cadmium and zinc in soils from or near Doñana National Park. J Environ Qual 23:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300010009x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sahai N, Sverjensky DA (1997) Evaluation of internally consistent parameters for the triple-layer model by the systematic analysis of oxide surface titration data. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:2801–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salbu B, Krekling T (1998) Characterisation of radioactive particles in the environment. Analyst 123:843–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saravanan R et al (2018) Line defect Ce3+ induced Ag/CeO2/ZnO nanostructure for visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Photochem Photobiol A 353:499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schaider LA, Senn DB, Estes ER, Brabander DJ, Shine JP (2014) Sources and fates of heavy metals in a mining-impacted stream: temporal variability and the role of iron oxides. Sci Total Environ 490:456–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schindler PW, Sposito G (1991) Surface complexation at (hydr)oxide surfaces. In: Bolt GH, De Boodt MF, Hayes MHB, McBride MB, De Strooper EBA (eds) Interactions at the soil colloid—soil solution interface. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Tsadilas C (2013) Fractionation of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in floodplain soils from Egypt, Germany and Greece E3S Web of Conferences 1:33003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sø HU, Postma D, Jakobsen R, Larsen F (2011) Sorption of phosphate onto calcite; results from batch experiments and surface complexation modeling. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75(10):2911–2923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stiglich PJ (1976) Adsorption of cadmium complexes at oxide-water interfaces. Australia, University of Melbourne, pp 330Google Scholar
  70. Stone AT, Torrents A, Smolen J, Vasudevan D, Hadley J (1993) Adsorption of organic compounds possessing ligand donor groups at the oxide/water interface. Environ Sci Technol 27(5):895–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taghipour M, Jalali M (2015) Effect of clay minerals and nanoparticles on chromium fractionation in soil contaminated with leather factory waste. J Hazard Mater 297:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taherian S, Entezari MH, Ghows N (2013) Sono-catalytic degradation and fast mineralization of p-chlorophenol: La0. 7Sr0. 3MnO3 as a nano-magnetic green catalyst. Ultrason Sonochem 20:1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tewari G, Tewari L, Srivastava PC, Ram B (2010) Nickel chemical transformation in polluted soils as affected by metal source and moisture regime. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 22:141–155.  https://doi.org/10.3184/095422910X12826770835261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang F, Chen J, Forsling W (1997) Modeling sorption of trace metals on natural sediments by surface complexation model. Environ Sci Technol 31:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol 2011:20.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/402647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xiang HF, Tang HA, Ying QH (1995) Transformation and distribution of forms of zinc in acid, neutral and calcareous soils of China. Geoderma 66:121–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00067-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xie Y, Lu G (2018) Mineralogical characteristics of sediments and heavy metal mobilization along a river watershed affected by acid mine drainage. PLoS ONE 13:e0190010.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yates DE (1975) The structure of the oxide/aqueous electrolyte interface. Thesis Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne, p 246Google Scholar
  79. Yusuf K (2007) Sequential extraction of lead, copper, cadmium and zinc in soils near Ojota waste site. J Agron 6:331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil Science, College of AgricultureBu-Ali Sina UniversityHamedanIran

Personalised recommendations