High-temperature separation of H2S from producer gas produced of biomass gasification by artificially prepared sorbents

  • P. Machač
  • M. MartinecEmail author
Original Paper


Commercial technologies are available to clean gasification hydrocarbon gases to the stringent levels of contaminants. However, new cheaper technologies are needed for stringent gas cleaning duty for producer gas production from biomass at high temperatures for use in fuel cells. This article describes the thermodynamics calculations aimed to estimate the suitability of various prepared sorbents on the basis of metal oxides (CaO, MnO, FeO, Fe2O3, ZnO and ZnFe2O4) to clean hydrogen sulphide from the producer gas at elevated gas temperatures and experimental verification of the function of prepared sorbents during specific conditions such as temperature and raw gas composition. Our prepared sorbents on the basis of zinc and copper oxides prove high sorption capacities for selective sorption of H2S. These sorbents can be with big advantage used in the industry for removal of H2S from biogas at high temperature. Output gas contains only low concentrations of H2S and can be then used for high-temperature fuel cells to produce electricity.


High-temperature separation Hydrogen sulphide Producer gas Biomass gasification Fuel cell 



This work was co-funded by University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague, and parts of this work have been obtained in the framework of European research program called Green fuel cell project co-financed by the European Commission under the Contract No. SES6-CT-2004-503122.


  1. Balachandran U, Lee TH, Park CY, Emerson JE, Picciolo JJ, Dorris SE (2014) Dense cermet membranes for hydrogen separation. Sep Purif Technol 121:54–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barelli L, Bidini G, de Arespacochaga N, Perez L, Sisani E (2017) Biogas use in high temperature fuel cells: enhancement of KOH–KI activated carbon performance toward H2S removal. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:10341–10353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eisavi B, Chitsaz A, Hosseinpour J, Ranjbar F (2018) Thermo-environmental and economic comparison of three different arrangements of solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine (SOFC–GT) hybrid systems. Energy Convers Manag 168:343–356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gatti M, Martelli E, Marechal F, Consonni S (2014) Review, modeling, heat integration, and improved schemes of rectisol (R)-based processes for CO2 capture. Appl Therm Eng 70:1123–1140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gholizadeh H, Azar AA (2017) Removal of hydrogen sulfide from methane using PEO-segmented copolymer-based multilayer composite membrane. Sep Sci Technol 52:2190–2198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hochgesa G (1969) Rectisol and purisol-efficient acid gas removal for high pressure hydrogen and syngas production. In: Abstract of papers of the American Chemical Society, p In4Google Scholar
  7. IUPAC, Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM (1998) Compendium of analytical nomenclature: definitive rules 1997, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee S, Lee T, Kim D (2017) Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using the amorphous composite of alpha-FeOOH and activated carbon powder. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:3116–3122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu X, Yang SY, Hu ZG, Qian Y (2015) Simulation and assessment of an integrated acid gas removal process with higher CO2 capture rate. Comput Chem Eng 83:48–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Niknejad SMS, Savoji H, Chenar MP, Soltanieh M (2017) Separation of H2S from CH4 by polymeric membranes at different H2S concentrations. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:375–384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ranke G (1973) Rectisol wash-moder technique for selective H2S removal from gas-mixtures. Chem Ing Tech 45:430Google Scholar
  12. Sadeghi M, Talakesh MM, Shamsabadi AA, Soroush M (2018) Novel application of a polyurethane membrane for efficient separation of hydrogen sulfide from binary and ternary gas mixtures. ChemistrySelect 3:3302–3308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scholes CA, Dong G, Kim JS, Jo HJ, Lee J, Lee YM (2017) Permeation and separation of SO2, H2S and CO2 through thermally rearranged (TR) polymeric membranes. Sep Purif Technol 179:449–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharma I, Hoadley AFA, Mahajani SM, Ganesh A (2016) Multi-objective optimisation of a rectisol (TM) process for carbon capture. J Clean Prod 119:196–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sun Y, Yang G, Zhang L, Sun Z (2017) Preparation of high performance H2S removal biochar by direct fluidized bed carbonization using potato peel waste. Process Saf Environ 107:281–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tilahun E, Bayrakdar A, Sahinkaya E, Calli B (2017) Performance of polydimethylsiloxane membrane contactor process for selective hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas. Waste Manag 61:250–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weinlaender C, Neubauer R, Hauth M, Hochenauer C (2017) Removing H2S from biogas using sorbents for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Chem Ing Tech 89:1247–1254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang R, Chen YF, Lei K, Ye BQ, Cao J, Liu D (2018) Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a novel coal pyrolysis–gasification–combustion staged conversion utilization polygeneration system. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 13:e2171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gaseous and Solid Fuels and Air ProtectionUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ChemistryUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations