Advertisement

Reduction of bioaccessibility and leachability of Pb and Cd in soils using sludge from water treatment plant

  • L. R. R. SouzaEmail author
  • F. V. Nakadi
  • M. B. T. Zanatta
  • M. A. M. S. da Veiga
Original Paper

Abstract

The adsorption properties of sludge from drinking water treatment station make it an option to remediate soils contaminated with toxic metals. This paper describes the reuse of this sludge to immobilize Pb and Cd from contaminated soils, as well as the efficiency of this process applying bioaccessibility assays to evaluate how this sludge/soil mixture can mitigate the exposition that could potentially affect the health of individuals. The adsorption test revealed that Pb and Cd bound five and eight times more strongly to the sludge as compared to soil, respectively. The bioaccessibility assay showed that the best proportion of sludge/soil was 1:1 for both metals, with the reduction of 28.8% and 34.5% for Pb and Cd bioaccessibility, respectively. The high amount of organic matter of sludge could underlie the Pb and Cd stabilization and the decrease in the bioaccessibility. Chemical fractioning revealed that Pb stabilized better on Fe, Al, and Mn oxides. After 4 months, the exchangeable fractions together were less than 3% in samples with sludge/soil ratio 1:1, indicating that Pb is less available for leaching and became more stable. Cd was less leachable and reached stable fractions faster in samples with sludge/soil ratio 1:1. Based on these results, the sludge represents a potential adsorbent for simple Pb and Cd remediation in soils.

Keywords

Cadmium Contaminated soil Lead Remediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for financial support (Grant#2009/00158-8). We are also grateful to the Water Treatment Plant in the city of São Carlos, Brazil, for providing the sludge samples.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_2042_MOESM1_ESM.docx (172 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 172 kb)

References

  1. Abo-El-Enein SA, Shebl A, Abo El-Dahab SA (2017) Drinking water treatment sludge as an efficient adsorbent for heavy metals removal. Appl Clay Sci 146:343–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso Castillo ML, Vereda Alonso E, Siles Cordero MT et al (2011) Fractionation of heavy metals in sediment by using microwave assisted sequential extraction procedure and determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Microchem J 98:234–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleton JD, Cave MR, Palumbo-Roe B, Wragg J (2013) Lead bioaccessibility in topsoils from lead mineralisation and urban domains, UK. Environ Pollut 178:278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arenas-Lago D, Andrade ML, Lago-Vila M et al (2014) Sequential extraction of heavy metals in soils from a copper mine: distribution in geochemical fractions. Geoderma 230–231:108–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barsby A, McKinley JM, Ofterdinger U et al (2012) Bioaccessibility of trace elements in soils in Northern Ireland. Sci Total Environ 433:398–417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradl HB (2004) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandon EFA, Oomen AG, Rompelberg CJM et al (2006) Consumer product in vitro digestion model: bioaccessibility of contaminants and its application in risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44:161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty R, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Mukherjee S (2015) Evaluation of contaminant transport parameters for hexavalent chromium migration through saturated soil media. Environ Earth Sci 74:5687–5697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4586-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. dos Reis DA, da Fonseca SA, Nascimento LP, Roeser HMP (2017) Influence of environmental and anthropogenic factors at the bottom sediments in a Doce River tributary in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:7456–7467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8443-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott HA, Dempsey BA, Maille PJ (1990) Content and fractionation of heavy metals in water treatment sludges. J Environ Qual 19:330.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900020021x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Escobar H (2015) Mud tsunami wreaks ecological havoc in Brazil. Science 350(80):1138–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Methods of soil analysis part 1: physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleyzes C, Tellier S, Astruc M (2002) Fractionation studies of trace elements in contaminated soils n sediments.pdf. Trac Trends Anal Chem 21:451–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00603-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamad SH, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM et al (2014) Risk assessment of total and bioavailable potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in urban soils of Baghdad-Iraq. Sci Total Environ 494–495:39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janoš P, Vávrová J, Herzogová L, Pilařová V (2010) Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on the mobility (leachability) of heavy metals in contaminated soil: a sequential extraction study. Geoderma 159:335–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karadaş C, Kara D (2012) Chemometric evaluation for the relation of BCR sequential extraction method and in vitro gastro-intestinal method for the assessment of metal bioavailability in contaminated soils in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1280–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0646-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulikowska D, Gusiatin ZM, Bulkowska K, Kierklo K (2015a) Humic substances from sewage sludge compost as washing agent effectively remove Cu and Cd from soil. Chemosphere 136:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulikowska D, Gusiatin ZM, Bułkowska K, Klik B (2015b) Feasibility of using humic substances from compost to remove heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) from contaminated soil aged for different periods of time. J Hazard Mater 300:882–891.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Z, Zhou M-M, Lin W (2014) The research of nanoparticle and microparticle hydroxyapatite amendment in multiple heavy metals contaminated soil remediation. J Nanomaterials 2014:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/168418 Google Scholar
  20. Li P, Lin C, Cheng H et al (2015) Contamination and health risks of soil heavy metals around a lead/zinc smelter in southwestern China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahar A, Wang P, Li R, Zhang Z (2015) Immobilization of lead and cadmium in contaminated soil using amendments: a review. Pedosphere 25:555–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30036-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCann CM, Gray ND, Tourney J et al (2015) Remediation of a historically Pb contaminated soil using a model natural Mn oxide waste. Chemosphere 138:211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naji A, Ismail A, Ismail AR (2010) Chemical speciation and contamination assessment of Zn and Cd by sequential extraction in surface sediment of Klang River, Malaysia. Microchem J 95:285–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordberg GF, Nogawa K, Nordberg MFL (2007) Handbook on the toxicology of metals, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pelfrêne A, Waterlot C, Douay F (2013) Influence of land use on human bioaccessibility of metals in smelter-impacted soils. Environ Pollut 178:80–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pelfrêne A, Waterlot C, Guerin A et al (2015) Use of an in vitro digestion method to estimate human bioaccessibility of Cd in vegetables grown in smelter-impacted soils: the influence of cooking. Environ Geochem Health 37:767–778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9684-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petticrew EL, Albers SJ, Baldwin SA et al (2015) The impact of a catastrophic mine tailings impoundment spill into one of North America’s largest fjord lakes: Quesnel Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Geophys Res Lett 42:3347–3355.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poggio L, Vrščaj B, Schulin R et al (2009) Metals pollution and human bioaccessibility of topsoils in Grugliasco (Italy). Environ Pollut 157:680–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodríguez L, Ruiz E, Alonso-Azcárate J, Rincón J (2009) Heavy metal distribution and chemical speciation in tailings and soils around a Pb–Zn mine in Spain. J Environ Manag 90:1106–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roy WR, Krapac IG, Chou S-FJ, Griffin RA (1992) Technical resource document: batch-type procedures for estimating soil adsorption of chemicals. EPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W et al (1999) Advances in evaluation the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol 33:3697–3705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schintu M, Marrucci A, Marras B et al (2016) Heavy metal accumulation in surface sediments at the port of Cagliari (Sardinia, western Mediterranean): environmental assessment using sequential extractions and benthic foraminifera. Mar Pollut Bull 111:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon in soils and sediments. Carbon N Y 32:25. http://epa.gov/esd/cmb/research/papers/bs116.pdf
  34. Siswoyo E, Mihara Y, Tanaka S (2014) Determination of key components and adsorption capacity of a low cost adsorbent based on sludge of drinking water treatment plant to adsorb cadmium ion in water. Appl Clay Sci 97–98:146–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang XY, Zhu YG, Cui YS et al (2006) The effect of ageing on the bioaccessibility and fractionation of cadmium in some typical soils of China. Environ Int 32:682–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang XY, Cui YS, Duan J, Tang L (2008) Pilot study of temporal variations in lead bioaccessibility and chemical fractionation in some Chinese soils. J Hazard Mater 160:29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S. EPA (1986) Method 9081: Cation-Exchange capacity of soils (Sodium Acetate). 1986, 1–4. https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-9081-cation-exchange-capacity-soils-sodium-acetate
  38. U.S. EPA (1996) Method 3050B: acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils, Revision 2. Washington, DC, pp 1–12. https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/epa-method-3050b-acid-digestion-sediments-sludges-and-soils
  39. Wang Y, Feng X, Villalobos M et al (2012) Sorption behavior of heavy metals on birnessite: relationship with its Mn average oxidation state and implications for types of sorption sites. Chem Geol 292–293:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu CH, Yiin LM, Lioy PJ (2006) The bioaccessibility of lead (Pb) from vacuumed house dust on carpets in urban residences. Risk Anal 26:125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00710.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou YF, Haynes RJ (2010) Sorption of heavy metals by inorganic and organic components of solid wastes: significance to use of wastes as low-cost adsorbents and immobilizing agents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40:909–977.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380802586857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou YF, Haynes RJ (2011) Removal of Pb(II), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using alum-derived water treatment sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:631–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0505-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou YF, Haynes RJ (2012) A comparison of organic wastes as bioadsorbents of heavy metal cations in aqueous solution and their capacity for desorption and regeneration. Environ Earth Sci 66:1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1321-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou Z, Yang Y, Li X et al (2016) The removal characteristics of natural organic matter in the recycling of drinking water treatment sludge: role of solubilized organics. Ultrason Sonochem 28:259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. R. R. Souza
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. V. Nakadi
    • 1
  • M. B. T. Zanatta
    • 1
  • M. A. M. S. da Veiga
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PrêtoBrazil

Personalised recommendations