Advertisement

Phytoremediation potential of sewage sludge using native plants: Gossypium hirsutum L. and Solanum lycopersicum L.

  • A. Almasi
  • M. Mohammadi
  • S. A. Mosavi
  • S. Eghbali
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. plants for sewage sludge stabilization. The plants were cultured for 120 days in two plastic beds of 30 cm × 60 cm × 50 cm (W. L. H) in dimension. The highest removal efficiency of organic carbon, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, total phosphorous, lead and cadmium was obtained 36, 33.6, 23, 74.29 and 91.2%, respectively. The removal rate of above parameters was considerably higher than control (P < 0.05), and in Solanum lycopersicum L., it was higher than Gossypium hirsutum L. (P < 0.05). The pH, electrical conductivity and sodium absorption ratio variation in control with plants were significant (P < 0.05). By increasing electrical conductivity and sodium absorption ratio, the removal efficiency of heavy metals increased. The highest translocation factor (2.44) and bio-concentration factor (1.63) were observed in the Solanum lycopersicum L. for lead. Maximum and minimum cadmium concentrations in the shoot parts of Solanum lycopersicum L. and Gossypium hirsutum L. plants were 1.21 and 0.03 mg/kg, respectively. TF mean for lead and cadmium in Gossypium hirsutum L. was and 0.65 and 1.77; in Solanum lycopersicum L., it was 0.44 and 1.5, respectively. The results showed that the mean of bio-concentration factor in Solanum lycopersicum L. bed for Cd and Pb was 0.39 and 0.63, and for Gossypium hirsutum L., it was 0.3 and 0.58, respectively. The changes in organic carbon, nutrients and heavy metal in sludge were showed that Solanum lycopersicum L and Gossypium hirsutum L. can be used properly to stabilize sewage sludge.

Keywords

Bio-concentration Translocation factor Sludge stabilization Heavy metal Nutrient Organic carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number 97025) for its financial support.

References

  1. Anning AK, Akoto R (2018) Assisted phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil from a mined site with Typha latifolia and Chrysopogon zizanioides. Ecotoxicol environ saf 148:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alharbi OM, Khattab RA, Ali I (2018) Health and environmental effects of persistent organic pollutants. J Mol Liq 263:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali I, AL-Othman ZA, Alwarthan A (2016) Green synthesis of functionalized iron nano particles and molecular liquid phase adsorption of ametryn from water. J Mol Liq 221:1168–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almasi A, Fazlzadeh M, Khosravi T, Sadeghi E (2012) A new approach to anaerobic-anoxic stabilization pond: treating petroleum refinery wastewater. Arch Des Sci 65:222–234Google Scholar
  5. Almasi A, Sharafi K, Hazrati S, Fazlzadehdavil M (2015) A survey on the ratio of effluent algal BOD concentration in primary and secondary facultative ponds to influent raw BOD concentration. Desalin Water Treat 53:3475–3481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Almasi A, Mohammadi M, Dargahi A, Amirian F, Motlagh ZJ et al (2018) Nitrogenous contamination in iranian vegetables: a review. Pol J Environ Stud 27:2405–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreolli M, Lampis S, Poli M, Gullner G, Biró B, Vallini G (2013) Endophytic Burkholderia fungorum DBT1 can improve phytoremediation efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 92:688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baruah P, Deka S (2013) Removal of hydrocarbon from crude oil contaminated soil by Cyperus brevifolius Rottb. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci 2:123–130Google Scholar
  9. Basheer AA (2018) Chemical chiral pollution: impact on the society and science and need of the regulations in the 21st century. Chirality 30:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dargahi A, Azizi A, Karami A, Amirian F, Mohammadi M, Almasi A (2016) Evaluating the chemical and microbial quality of drinking water in harsin city. Int J Pharm Technol 8:16709–16719Google Scholar
  11. De Sanctis M, Del Moro G, Chimienti S, Ritelli P, Levantesi C, Di Iaconi C (2017) Removal of pollutants and pathogens by a simplified treatment scheme for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture. Sci Total Environ 580:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhanwal P, Kumar A, Dudeja S, Chhokar V, Beniwal V (2017) Recent advances in phytoremediation technology. In: Kumar R., Sharma A., Ahluwalia S. (eds) Advances in Environmental Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp 227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elloumi N, Belhaj D, Jerbi B, Zouari M, Kallel M (2017) Effects of sewage sludge on bio-accumulation of heavy metals in tomato seedlings. Span J Agric Res 14:807–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enang RK, Yerima BPK, Kome GK, Van Ranst E (2018) Assessing the effectiveness of the Walkley-Black method for soil organic carbon determination in tephra soils of cameroon. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1–8Google Scholar
  15. Gupta VK, Ali I (2012) Environmental water: advances in treatment, remediation and recycling. NewnesGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadi P, Xu M, Ning C, Lin CSK, McKay G (2015) A critical review on preparation, characterization and utilization of sludge-derived activated carbons for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 260:895–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hechmi N, Aissa NB, Abdenaceur H, Jedidi N (2014) Evaluating the phytoremediation potential of Phragmites australis grown in pentachlorophenol and cadmium co-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:1304–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ibrahim M (2017) Effect of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi combined with manure on the change in concentration some mineral elements in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Plant Nutr 40:2862–2871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaafari J, Seyedsalehi M, Safari G, Arjestan ME, Barzanouni H et al (2017) Simultaneous biological organic matter and nutrient removal in an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2O) moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) integrated system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jan S, Parray JA (2016) Biodiversity prospecting for phytoremediation of metals in the environment. In: Approaches to heavy metal tolerance in plants, pp 103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang W, Bao J, Zheng J, Xu F, Wang L (2016) Potential of woody plants from a Tonglushan ancient copper spoil heap for phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil1. Int J Phytoremediation 20:111–120Google Scholar
  22. Liu YY, Cui S, Han Q, Zhang QR (2015) Applied mechanics and materials. Trans Tech Publ 768:150–154Google Scholar
  23. Luo K, Ma T, Liu H, Wu L, Ren J et al (2015) Efficiency of repeated phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc from an agricultural soil contaminated with sewage sludge. Int J Phytorem 17:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maryam G, Majid N, Islam M, Ahmed O, Abdu A (2015) Phytoremediation of copper-contaminated sewage sludge by tropical plants. J Tropical For Sci 27:535–547Google Scholar
  25. Mirza N, Mahmood Q, Pervez A, Ahmad R, Farooq R et al (2010) Phytoremediation potential of Arundo donax in arsenic-contaminated synthetic wastewater. Biores Technol 101:5815–5819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreira IT, Oliveira OM, Triguis JA, Queiroz AF, Barbosa RM, et al (2013) Evaluation of the effects of metals on biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Microchem J 110:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mousavi SA, Almasi A, Kamari Z, Abdali F, Yosefi Z (2015) Application of the central composite design and response surface methodology for the treatment of Kermanshah landfill leachate by a sequencing batch reactor. Desalin Water Treat 56:622–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naghipour D, Gharibi H, Taghavi K, Jaafari J (2016a) Influence of EDTA and NTA on heavy metal extraction from sandy-loam contaminated soils. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3512–3518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naghipour D, Taghavi K, Jaafari J, Mahdavi Y, Ghanbari Ghozikali M et al (2016b) Statistical modeling and optimization of the phosphorus biosorption by modified Lemna minor from aqueous solution using response surface methodology (RSM). Desalin Water Treat 57:19431–19442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naghipour D, Jaafari J, Ashrafi SD, Mahvi AH (2017) Remediation of heavy metals contaminated silty clay loam soil by column extraction with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and nitrilo triacetic acid. J Environ Eng 143:4017–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perriguey J, Sterckeman T, Morel J-L (2008) Effect of rhizosphere and plant-related factors on the cadmium uptake by maize (Zea mays L.). Environ Exp Bot 63:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pirsaheb M, Almasi A, Sharafi K, Jabari Y, Haghighi S (2016) A comparative study of heavy metals concentration of surface soils at metropolis squares with high traffic—a case study: Kermanshah, Iran (2015). Acta Med 32:891Google Scholar
  33. Rajkumar M, Sandhya S, Prasad M, Freitas H (2012) Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 30:1562–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ren X, Yan R, Wang HC, Kou YY, Chae KJ et al (2015) Citric acid and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid as effective washing agents to treat sewage sludge for agricultural reuse. Waste Manag 46:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saleh J, Ghasemi H, Shahriari A, Alizadeh F, Hosseini Y (2017) Phytoremediation potential of tomato for Cd and Cr removal from polluted Soils. World Acad Sci Eng Tech Int JBiol Biomol Agric Food Biotechnol Eng 11:268–271Google Scholar
  36. Scaglia B, Tambone F, Corno L, Orzi V, Lazzarini Y et al (2018) Potential agronomic and environmental properties of thermophilic anaerobically digested municipal sewage sludge measured by an unsupervised and a supervised chemometric approach. Sci Total Environ 637:791–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tripathi and Tripathi S (2017) Phytoremediation – Aeration System for Treatment of Urban Wastewater. Austin Chem Eng 4:1047–1054Google Scholar
  38. Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006) Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci Total Environ 368:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zahedi S, Romero-Güiza M, Icaran P, Yuan Z, Pijuan M (2018) Optimization of free nitrous acid pre-treatment on waste activated sludge. Biores Technol 252:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Almasi
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Mohammadi
    • 2
    • 3
  • S. A. Mosavi
    • 2
    • 3
  • S. Eghbali
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Social Development and Health Promotion Research CenterKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
  3. 3.Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH)Kermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
  4. 4.Research Centre CommitteeKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran

Personalised recommendations