Advertisement

UV and solar photocatalytic disinfection of municipal wastewater: inactivation, reactivation and regrowth of bacterial pathogens

  • A. C. Mecha
  • M. S. Onyango
  • A. Ochieng
  • M. N. B. Momba
Original Paper
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Pollution of water sources by pathogens is a major concern worldwide. This study investigated critical disinfection aspects such as bacterial regrowth or decay and evaluation of metal-ion leaching during photocatalytic disinfection. The inactivation of waterborne bacterial pathogens (Escherichia coli, Salmonella species, Shigella species and Vibrio cholerae) using ultraviolet and solar photocatalysis was evaluated. Bare and metal-ion (silver, copper and iron)-doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts were used to explore comparative performance. The influence of photocatalyst concentration (0.1–1.0 g/L), source of radiation (ultraviolet or solar light) and water type (synthetic and municipal wastewater) was examined. The disinfection data were fitted to the pseudo-first-order model. The disinfection efficiency was higher in saline deionized water (99.9998–100%) that was spiked with the target pathogens (106 colony forming units/mL), compared to actual wastewater samples. Within 180 min of treatment under solar irradiation, disinfection efficacy of 86.8–100% was achieved, while 99.4–100% disinfection efficacy was attained under ultraviolet irradiation within 60 min. A significant difference (p < 0.05) between ultraviolet and solar photocatalysis was observed, and silver-doped titanium dioxide displayed the best performance under all conditions tested. Nevertheless, after a contact time of 180 min, there was no bacterial regrowth observed even for the solar photocatalysis processes; in fact, bacterial decay occurred. The elution of doping metals into the treated wastewater was insignificant. Therefore, the metal-ion-doped photocatalysts were effective under solar radiation, thus overcoming the limitation of bare titanium dioxide which is only effective under ultraviolet light and preventing bacterial regrowth.

Keywords

Metal-ion doping Pathogens Titanium dioxide Ultraviolet and solar radiation Wastewater 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Research Foundation (NRF) for funding this study through the Egypt–South Africa joint project collaboration (Grant number 78636).

References

  1. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Martens WN, Brown R, Hashib MA (2010) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols in wastewater: a review on current status and developments. Desalination 261:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrus Z, Balázs N, Alapi T, Wittmann G, Sipos P, Dombi A, Mogyorósi K (2008) Synthesis, structure and photocatalytic properties of Fe(III)-doped TiO2 prepared from TiCl3. Appl Catal B 81:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benabbou AK, Derriche Z, Felix C, Lejeune P, Guillard C (2007) Photocatalytic inactivation of Escherischia coli: effect of concentration of TiO2 and microorganism, nature, and intensity of UV irradiation. Appl Catal B 76:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berney M, Weilenmann HU, Simonetti A, Egli T (2006) Efficacy of solar disinfection of Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella Typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae. J Appl Microbiol 101:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi W, Termin A, Hoffmann MR (1994) The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2: correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J Phys Chem 98:13669–13679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chong MN, Jin B, Saint CP (2011) Bacterial inactivation kinetics of a photo-disinfection system using novel titania-impregnated kaolinite photocatalyst. Chem Eng J 171:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das S, Sinha S, Suar M, Yun S-I, Mishra A, Tripathy SK (2015) Solar-photocatalytic disinfection of Vibrio cholerae by using Ag@ZnO core–shell structure nanocomposites. J Photochem Photobiol, B 142:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Water Affairs (DWA) (1984) Requirements for the Purification of Waste Water or Effluent, Act No. 991. South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  9. Kubacka A, Ferrer M, Fernández-García M (2012) Kinetics of photocatalytic disinfection in TiO2-containing polymer thin films: UV and visible light performances. Appl Catal B 121–122:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li D, Zeng S, Gu AZ, He M, Shi H (2013) Inactivation, reactivation and regrowth of indigenous bacteria in reclaimed water after chlorine disinfection of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. J Environ Sci 25:1319–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCullagh C, Robertson JMC, Bahnemann DW, Robertson PKJ (2007) The application of TiO2 photocatalysis for disinfection of water contaminated with pathogenic micro-organisms: a review. Res Chem Intermed 33:359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mecha AC, Onyango MS, Ochieng A, Fourie CJS, Momba MNB (2016a) Synergistic effect of UV–vis and solar photocatalytic ozonation on the degradation of phenol in municipal wastewater: a comparative study. J Catal 341:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mecha AC, Onyango MS, Ochieng A, Jamil TS, Fourie CJS, Momba MNB (2016b) Uv and solar light photocatalytic removal of organic contaminants in municipal wastewater. Sep Sci Technol 51:1765–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mecha AC, Otieno FAO, Pillay VL (2016c) Long-term disinfection performance of silver nanoparticles impregnated membranes. Desalination Water Treat 57:4906–4912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mecha AC, Onyango MS, Ochieng A, Momba MNB (2017) Evaluation of synergy and bacterial regrowth in photocatalytic ozonation disinfection of municipal wastewater. Sci Total Environ 601–602:626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reymond JP, Kolenda F (1999) Estimation of the point of zero charge of simple and mixed oxides by mass titration. Powder Technol 103:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rincón A-G, Pulgarin C (2007) Absence of E. coli regrowth after Fe3+ and TiO2 solar photoassisted disinfection of water in CPC solar photoreactor. Catal Today 124:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rizzo L, Sannino D, Vaiano V, Sacco O, Scarpa A, Pietrogiacomi D (2014) Effect of solar simulated N-doped TiO2 photocatalysis on the inactivation and antibiotic resistance of an E. coli strain in biologically treated urban wastewater. Appl Catal B 144:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubio D, Nebot E, Casanueva JF, Pulgarin C (2013) Comparative effect of simulated solar light, UV, UV/H2O2 and photo-Fenton treatment (UV–Vis/H2O2/Fe2+,3+) in the Escherichia coli inactivation in artificial seawater. Water Res 47:6367–6379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SANS (2011) Drinking water, Part 1: Microbiological, physical, aesthetic and chemical determinands. South African National Standard, 1st edn. SABS Standards Division, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  21. Sichel C, Blanco J, Malato S, Fernández-Ibáñez P (2007) Effects of experimental conditions on E. coli survival during solar photocatalytic water disinfection. J Photochem Photobiol, A 189:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suri RPS, Thornton HM, Muruganandham M (2012) Disinfection of water using Pt- and Ag-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. Environ Technol 33:1651–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Grieken R, Marugán J, Sordo C, Martínez P, Pablos C (2009) Photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria in water using suspended and immobilized silver-TiO2. Appl Catal B 93:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Venieri D, Fraggedaki A, Kostadima M, Chatzisymeon E, Binas V, Zachopoulos A, Kiriakidis G, Mantzavinos D (2014) Solar light and metal-doped TiO2 to eliminate water-transmitted bacterial pathogens: photocatalyst characterization and disinfection performance. Appl Catal B 154–155:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walt M, Krüger M, Walt C (2009) The South African oxidation and disinfection manual, TT 406/09. Water Research CommissionGoogle Scholar
  26. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Yamashita H, Harada M, Misaka J, Takeuchi M, Ikeue K, Anpo M (2002) Degradation of propanol diluted in water under visible light irradiation using metal ion-implanted titanium dioxide photocatalysts. J Photochem Photobiol, A 148:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Renewable Energy and WaterVaal University of TechnologyVanderbijlparkSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Environmental, Water and Earth SciencesTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Chemical and Process EngineeringMoi UniversityEldoretKenya

Personalised recommendations