Advertisement

The effect of crop exudates and EDTA on cadmium adsorption by agricultural podsolic soil: implications on groundwater

  • A. K. Mosai
  • H. TutuEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Sorption studies were conducted to investigate the effect of the presence of organic acids or exudates released by crops [acetic acid (AA), citric acid (CA) and oxalic acid (OA)] and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the adsorption of carcinogenic cadmium (Cd) by an agricultural podsolic soil acting as a natural adsorbent. Powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and cation exchange capacity were used to characterize the soil. The effect of pH and changing concentration of the organic acids and Cd on the adsorption was investigated. PHREEQC (short for pH, REdox and EQuilibrium in C language) geochemical modeling was used to determine the speciation of Cd. The podsolic soil was effective as a natural clay adsorbent in capturing Cd, thus preventing mobility to groundwater. In the presence of crops organic acids and EDTA, the adsorption capacity decreased at all initial concentrations of Cd and the extent of reduction followed the sequence: OA < AA < CA < EDTA. The adsorption of Cd onto the soil was best described by Freundlich isotherm in the presence of all acids. The adsorption of Cd decreased as the concentration of crop organic acids increased. Moreover, EDTA totally inhibited the adsorption of Cd at all concentrations. The adsorption of Cd increased in the presence of CA and EDTA at pH greater than 5. The capturing of Cd by the soil will be decreased by the presence of organic acids, thus increasing mobility to groundwater which should be protected from such pollutants.

Keywords

Organic acids Mining activities Leaching Adsorption capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of the Witwatersrand (MSI 7864) and National Research Foundation (NRF) (Grant Nos: 96332 and CPRR13091540533), South Africa, for funding. This research was done at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, in 2016.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdić Š, Memić M, Šabanović E, Sulejmanović J, Begić S (2018) Adsorptive removal of eight heavy metals from aqueous solution by unmodified and modified agricultural waste: tangerine peel. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1645-7 Google Scholar
  2. Batchelor B (1998) Leach models for contaminants immobilized by pH-dependent mechanisms. J Environ Sci Technol 32(11):1721–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauddh K, Singh K, Singh RP (2016) Ricinus communis L. A value added crop for remediation of cadmium contaminated soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96(2):265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradl HB (2004) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen YX, Lin Q, Luo YM, He YF, Zhen SJ, Yu YL, Tian GM, Wong MH (2003) The role of citric acid on the phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 50:807–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cristofaro AD, Zhou DH, He JZ, Violante A (1998) Comparison between oxalate and humate on copper adsorption on goethite. Fresen Environ Bull 7:570–576Google Scholar
  7. Elles MP, Blaylock MJ (2000) Amendment optimization to enhance lead extractability from contaminated soils for phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation 2(1):5–89Google Scholar
  8. Fiol N, Villaescusa I (2009) Determination of sorbent point zero charge: usefulness in sorption studies. Environ Chem Lett 7(1):79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedly JC, Kent DB, Davis JA (2002) Simulation of the mobility of metal-EDTA complexes in groundwater: the influence of contaminant metals. J Environ Sci Technol 36:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoremediation: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillman GP, Sumpter EA (1986) Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Aust J Soil Res 24:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray CW, McLaren RG, Roberts AHC, Condron LM (1999) Solubility, sorption and desorption of native added cadmium in relation to properties of soils in New Zealand. Eur J Soil Sci 50:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hadi J, Tournassat C, Lerouge C (2016) Pitfalls in using the hexaamminecobalt method for cation exchange capacity measurements on clay minerals and clay-rocks: redox interferences between the cationic dye and the sample. Appl Clay Sci 119(2):393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris DC (2010) Quantitative chemical analysis, 8th edn. WH Freeman and company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Huaying L, Yunguo L, Guangming Z, Lu Z, Xin W, Yaqin W, Chunlin W, Xinjiang H, Weihua X (2014) Enhanced efficiency of cadmium removal by Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. in the presence of exogenous citric and oxalic acids. J Environ Sci 26:2508–2516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaushal M, Patil MD, Wani SP (2017) Potency of constructed wetlands for deportation of pathogens index from rural, urban and industrial wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 26:1–2Google Scholar
  17. Liu HJ, Zhang JL, Christie P, Zhang F (2008) Influence of iron plaque on uptake and accumulation of Cd by rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings grown in soil. Sci Total Environ 394(2–3):361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahar A, Wang P, Ali A, Lahori AH, Awasthi MK, Wang Z, Guo Z, Wang Q, Feng S, Li R, Zhang Z (2017) (Im) mobilization of soil heavy metals using CaO, FA, sulfur, and Na 2 S: a 1-year incubation study. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1–14Google Scholar
  19. Marschner H, Romheld V (1995) Strategies of plants for acquisition of iron. Plant Soil 165:263–274Google Scholar
  20. Mosai AK, Bakatula EN, Tutu H (2017) Adsorption of cadmium, copper and chromium by an agricultural soil impacted by mining activities. Water Air Soil Pollut 228(8):287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munsell Color company (1975) Munsell soil colour charts, 1975th edn. Munsell colour Co., BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowack B, Sigg L (1997) Dissolution of Fe(III) hydroxides by metal-EDTA complexes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61(5):951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ochieng L (2002) Mobility studies of heavy metals in mining-polluted soil Rustenburg Section of Anglo Platinum. M.Sc. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A43, p 497. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43/. Accessed 19 June 2017
  25. Pehlivan E, Özkan AM, Dinç S, Parlayici S (2009) Adsorption of Cu2+ and Pb2+ ion on dolomite powder. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1044–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sayed M, Burham N (2018) Removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous soluion and naural waer samples using polyurehane foam/organobenonie/iron oxide nanocomposie adsorben. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15(1):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siosemarde M, Kave F, Pazira E, Sedghi H, Ghaderi SJ (2010) Determine of constant coefficients to relate total dissolved solids to electrical conductivity. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 46:258–260Google Scholar
  28. Sukreeyapongse O, Holm PE, Strobel BW, Panichsakpatana S, Magid J, Hansen HCB (2002) pH-dependent release of cadmium, copper, and lead from natural and sludge amended soils. J Environ Qual 31:1901–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun YC, Chi PH, Shiue MY (2001) Comparison of different digestion methods for total decomposition of siliceous and organic environmental samples. Anal Sci 17(12):1395–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams D (1998) Storing up trouble? Chem Br 1:48–52Google Scholar
  31. Wu LH, Luo YM, Christie P, Wong MH (2003) Effects of EDTA and low molecular weight organic acids on soil solution properties of a heavy metal polluted soil. Chemosphere 50(6):819–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Sciences Institute, School of ChemistryUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations