Advertisement

Laboratory investigation on solutes removal from artificial amended saline soil during the electrochemical treatment

  • M. M. Bessaim
  • H. Missoum
  • K. Bendani
  • N. Laredj
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Soil salinity has become one of the environmental issues around the world, compromising thus land ecosystems as well as civil engineering infrastructures and facilities. This hazard is further aggravated, primarily when dealing with low permeable soils, where conventional remediation techniques are inadequate and mostly ineffective. Electrochemical treatment is an innovative and green technology for restoration of saline soils. This process has been proven to be the most efficient, promising technique, offering an optimal and sustainable remediation of salt-affected soils. The originality of this method involves application of an electric current through inserted electrodes into the soil matrix, inducing mobilization and transport of salts toward the electrodes of opposite charge via electro-migration process. The electrical current also induces a net water flow by electro-osmosis mechanism, allowing better draw and removal of solutes within the porous medium. This paper investigates the performance of the electrochemical treatment in remediation of salt-affected soil. Sodium, potassium and calcium were used as selective contaminants with targeted concentration of 0.5 M. In this aim, a laboratory bench scale was designed. It consists of soil box, anolyte and catholyte reservoirs, current monitoring devices, pH and electrical conductivity probe controller. The highest removal was for sodium and potassium with an extraction of 88 and 82%, respectively. Calcium exhibits lower removal rate of 57%, due to the development of the pH gradient, hindering therefore their mobility. This study demonstrated that electrochemical treatment can be advantageous in remediation of salt-affected soils, for enhancing agricultural productivity as well as soil constructional uses.

Keywords

Electrochemical phenomena Electrochemical remediation pH Salts removal Silty-clay saline soil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the chemical department for their help in this research. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks the environmental research council for their technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

13762_2018_1914_MOESM1_ESM.xls (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 34 kb)

References

  1. Abdullah WS, Al-Abadi AM (2010) Cationic–electrokinetic improvement of an expansive soil. Appl Clay Sci 47:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acar YB, Alshawabkeh A (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27:2638–2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed MY, Taibi S, Souli H, Fleureau JM (2013) The effect of pH on electro-osmotic flow in argillaceous rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 31:1335–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ammami MT, Benamar A, Wang H, Bailleul C, Legras M, Le Derf F, Portet-Koltalo F (2014) Simultaneous electrokinetic removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals from a sediment using mixed enhancing agents. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1801.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0395-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ammami MT, Portet-Koltalo F, Benamar A, Duclairoir-Poc C, Wang H, Le Derf F (2015) Application of biosurfactants and periodic voltage gradient for enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metals and PAHs in dredged marine sediments. Chemosphere 125:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkins PW (1990) Physical chemistry, 4th edn. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 755–756Google Scholar
  7. Bahemmat M, Farahbakhsh M, Shabani F (2015) Compositional and metabolic quotient analysis of heavy metal contaminated soil after electroremediation. Environ Earth Sci 74:4639–4648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameselle C (2015) Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil. Electrochim Acta 181:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameselle C, Reddy KR (2012) Development and enhancement of electro-osmotic flow for the removal of contaminants from soils. Electrochim Acta 86:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casagrande L (1949) Electro-osmosis in soils. Geotechnique 1(3):159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho J, Park S, Baek K (2010) Electrokinetic restoration of saline agricultural lands. J Appl Electrochem 40:1085–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi J-H, Lee Y-J, Lee H-G, Ha T-H, Bae J-H (2012) Removal characteristics of salts of greenhouse in field test by in situ electrokinetic process. Electrochimica Acta 86:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi JH, Lee YJ, Maruthamuthu S, Lee HG, Ha TH (2016) Restoration of saline greenhouse soil and its effect on crop’s growth through in situ field-scale electrokinetic technology. Sep Sci Technol 51:1227–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dean JA (1992) Lange’s handbook of chemistry, 14th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Faisal AAH, Sulaymon AH, Khaliefa QM (2018) A review of permeable reactive barrier as passive sustainable technology for groundwater remediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1123–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gholami M, Yousefi Kebria D, Mahmudi M (2014) Electrokinetic remediation of perchloroethylene-contaminated soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0555-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Göde C, Yola ML, Yılmaz A, Atar N, Wang S (2017) A novel electrochemical sensor based on calixarene functionalized reduced graphene oxide: application to simultaneous determination of Fe(III), Cd (II) and Pb(II) ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 508:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta VK, Yola ML, Atar N, Solak AO, Uzun L, Üstündağ Z (2013a) Electrochemically modified sulfisoxazole nanofilm on glassy carbon for determination of cadmium (II) in water samples. Electrochim Acta 105:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta VK, Yola ML, AtarN Ustundağ Z, Solak AO (2013b) A novel sensitive Cu (II) and Cd (II) nanosensor platform: graphene oxide terminated p-aminophenyl modified glassy carbon surface. Electrochim Acta 112:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayasekera S (2007) Stabilising volume change characteristics of expansive soils using electrokinetics: a laboratory based investigation. In: International conference in geotechnical engineering, Colombo, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
  21. Jayasekera S, Hall S (2007) Modification of the properties of salt affected soils using electrochemical treatments. Geotech Geol Eng 25:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jia X, Larson D, Slack D, Walworth J (2005) Electrokinetic control of nitrate movement in soil. Eng Geol 77 (3–4):273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jo SU, Kim DH, Yang JS, Baek K (2012) Pulse-enhanced electrokineticrestoration of sulfate-containing salinegreenhouse soil. Electrochimica Acta 86:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jo S, Shin YJ, Yang JS, Moon DH, Koutsospyros A, Baek K (2015) Enhanced electrokinetic transport of sulfate in saline soil. Water Air Soil Pollution 226:199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2459-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khanamani A, Fathizad H, Karimi H, Shojaei S (2017) Assessing desertification by using soil indices. Arab J Geosci 10:287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3054-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kharayat Y (2012) Distillery wastewater: bioremediation approaches. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 9:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim K-J, Cho J-M, Baek K, Yang J-S, Ko S-H (2010) Electrokinetic removal of chloride and sodium from tidelands. J Appl Electrochem 40(6):1139–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee Y-J, Choi J-H, Lee H-G, Ha T-H (2013) In Situ electrokinetic removal of salts from greenhouse soil using iron electrode. Sep Sci Technol 48 (5):749–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li T, Guo S, Wu B, Li F, Niu Z (2010) Effect of electric intensity on the microbial degradation of petroleum pollutants in soil. J Environ Sci 22:1381–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukman S, Mu’azu ND, Essa MH, Usman A (2015) Optimal removal of cadmium from heavily contaminated saline-sodic soil using integrated electrokinetic adsorption technique. Arab J Sci Eng 40:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malekzadeh M, Lovisa J, Sivakugan N (2016) An overview of electrokinetic consolidation of soils. Geotech Geol Eng 34:759–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manokararajah K, Ranjan RS (2005) Electrokinetic retention, migration and remediation of nitrates in silty loam soil under hydraulic gradients. Eng Geology 77(3–4):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mao X, Han FX, Shao X, Guo K, McComb J, Njemanze S, Arslan Z, Zhang Z (2016) The distribution and elevated solubility of lead, arsenic and cesium in contaminated paddy soil enhanced with the electrokinetic field. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1641.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1007-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masi M, Ceccarini A, Iannelli R (2017) Multispecies reactive transport modelling of electrokinetic remediation of harbour sediments. J Hazard Mater 326:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maturi K, Reddy KR (2006) Simultaneous removal of heavy metals and organic contaminants from soils by electrokinetics using a modified cyclodextrin. Chemosphere 63(6):1022–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Paramkusam BR, Srivastava RK, Mohan D (2015) Electrokinetic removal of mixed heavy metals from a contaminated low permeable soil by surfactant and chelants. Env Earth Sci 73(3):1191–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng C, Almeira JO, Gu Q (2013) Effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution and heavy metal ions migration during soil electrokinetic remediation. Environ Earth Sci 69(1):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qadir M, Noble AD, Schubert S, Thomas RJ, Arslan A (2006) Sodicity-induced land degradation and its sustainable management: problems and prospects. Land Degrad Dev 17:661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reddy KR, Cameselle C (2009) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reddy KR, Saichek RE (2004) Enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from clay soil by periodic electric potential application. J Env Sci Health Part A – Toxic/Hazardous Substances Env Eng 39:1189–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reddy KR, Shirani AB (1997) Electrokinetic remediation of metal contaminated glacial tills. Geotech Geol Eng 15:3–29Google Scholar
  43. Soltner D (1992) Les bases de la production végétale. Tome 1: le sol. Collection Sciences et Techniques Agricoles, 19ème édition, Sainte Gemmes sur LoireGoogle Scholar
  44. Song Y, Ammami MT, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, Wang H (2016) Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:10577–10586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sonon LS, Saha U, Kissel DE (2012) Soil salinity, testing, data interpretation and recommendations. The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Circular No. 1019Google Scholar
  46. Tahmasbian I, Safari Sinegani AA (2014) Chelate-assisted phytoextraction of cadmium from a mine soil by negatively charged sunflower. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:695–702.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0394-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu H, Hu LM, Wen QB (2015) Electro-osmotic enhancement of bentonite with reactive and inert electrodes. Appl Clay Sci 111(7):76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yola ML, Atar N, Qureshi MS, Üstündağ Z, Solak AO (2012) Electrochemically grafted etodolac film on glassy carbon for Pb(II) determination. Sens Actuators B Chem 171:1207–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yola ML, Eren T, İlkimen H, Atar N, Yenikaya C (2014) A sensitive voltammetric sensor for determination of Cd (II) in human plasma. J Mol Liq 197:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yuan L, Li H, Xu X, Zhang J, Wang N, Yu H (2016) Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals contaminated kaolin by a CNT-covered polyethylene terephthalate yarn cathode. Electrochim Acta 213:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang M, Guo S, Li F, Wu Bo (2017) Distribution of ion contents and microorganisms during the electro-bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated saline soil. J Env Sci Health Part A 52(12):1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhu S, Zhu D, Wang X (2017) Removal of fluorine from red mud (bauxite residue) by electrokinetics. Electrochim Acta 242:300–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Bessaim
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Missoum
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. Bendani
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Laredj
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversity Abdelhamid Ibn Badis of MostaganemMostaganemAlgeria
  2. 2.Construction, Transport and Protection of Environment Laboratory (LCTPE)MostaganemAlgeria

Personalised recommendations