Advertisement

Comparison of different natural fiber treatments: a literature review

  • B. KoohestaniEmail author
  • A. K. Darban
  • P. Mokhtari
  • E. Yilmaz
  • E. Darezereshki
Review

Abstract

Interests in the use of natural fibers–fillers in composite materials are growing rapidly due to the low cost and high availability. However, poor surface adhesion and mineralization are the main drawbacks that restrict the use of natural fibers in different applications. Thus, it is essential to perform a treatment that can improve the surface properties of natural fibers before being used in the composites. Such treatments are physical (corona, plasma, etc.), chemical (alkaline, silane, acetylation, etc.), and biological (enzyme), but the benefits of each treatment considering energy consumption and effluent generation should be considered more in-depth. Via a literature review, this study investigated the mechanical performance, energy consumption, and generated effluents of chemical treatments (silane, alkaline, acetylation, and maleated coupling) as the consequence of fiber treatment to propose a more sustainable treatment at the scope of the treatment section in the factory of natural fibers–polymer composites (gate to gate). It was shown during this review study that the maleated coupling is a more sustainable method since it needs no specific energy during the treatment while produces no effluent and improves the mechanical strength performance of the composites more constantly.

Keywords

Natural fibers–fillers Physical treatment Chemical treatment Biological treatment Surface properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors of this work want to appreciate the UQAT professional and technical staffs for their helpful support and assistance. This study was accomplished by Elite Iranian Organization Research Grant (No. 316/5603).

References

  1. Adams RH, Cerecedo-López RA, Alejandro-Álvarez LA, Domínguez-Rodríguez VI, Nieber JL (2016) Treatment of water-repellent petroleum-contaminated soil from Bemidji, Minnesota, by alkaline desorption. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2249–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A, Shaker K, Nawab Y, Jabbar M, Hussain T, Militky J, Baheti V (2018) Hydrophobic treatment of natural fibers and their composites—a review. J Ind Text 47:2153–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Maadeed MA, Labidi S (2014) 4—Recycled polymers in natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites. In: Hodzic A, Shanks RA (eds) Natural fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 103–114Google Scholar
  4. Anand P, Anbumalar V (2017) Investigation on thermal behavior of alkali and benzoyl treated hemp fiber reinforced cellulose filled epoxy hybrid green composites. Cellul Chem Technol 51:91–101Google Scholar
  5. Arsène MA, Okwo A, Bilba K, Soboyejo ABO, Soboyejo WO (2007) Chemically and thermally treated vegetable fibers for reinforcement of cement-based composites. Mater Manuf Process 22:214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atadana FW (2010) Catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin model compounds. In: M.Sc. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Bachtiar D, Sapuan SM, Hamdan MM (2008) The effect of alkaline treatment on tensile properties of sugar palm fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Des 29:1285–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya A, Misra B (2004) Grafting: a versatile means to modify polymers: techniques, factors and applications. Prog Polym Sci 29:767–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biagiotti J, Puglia D, Kenny JM (2004) A review on natural fibre-based composites—part I: structure, processing and properties of vegetable fibres. J Nat Fibers 1:37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilba K, Arsene MA (2008) Silane treatment of bagasse fiber for reinforcement of cementitious composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1488–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bisanda ETN (2000) The effect of alkali treatment on the adhesion characteristics of sisal fibres. Appl Compos Mater 7:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blankenhorn PR, Blankenhorn BD, Silsbee MR, DiCola M (2001) Effects of fiber surface treatments on mechanical properties of wood fiber–cement composites. Cem Concr Res 31:1049–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Lucka-Gabor M, Gutowski VS (2008) The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. eXPRESS Polym Lett 2:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Jaszkiewicz A, Erdmann K (2010) Polypropylene composites with enzyme modified abaca fibre. Compos Sci Technol 70:854–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boland C (2014) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of natural fiber composites for automotive applications: impacts of renewable material content and lightweighting. In: M.Sc. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  17. Brígida AIS, Calado VMA, Gonçalves LRB, Coelho MAZ (2010) Effect of chemical treatments on properties of green coconut fiber. Carbohydr Polym 79:832–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buschle-Diller G, Fanter C, Loth F (1999) Structural changes in hemp fibers as a result of enzymatic hydrolysis with mixed enzyme systems. Text Res J 69:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavaco-Paulo A, Gübitz GM (2003) Textile processing with enzymes. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chand N, Fahim M (2008) Tribology of natural fiber polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chandramohan D, Marimuthu K (2011) A review on natural fibers. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 8:194–206Google Scholar
  22. Choy SY, Prasad KMN, Wu TY, Ramanan RN (2015) A review on common vegetables and legumes as promising plant-based natural coagulants in water clarification. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chung DDL (2010) Composite material structure and processing. In: Composite materials: science and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, London, pp 1–34. ISBN 978-1-84882-830-8Google Scholar
  24. Cichocki FR Jr, Thomason JL (2002) Thermoelastic anisotropy of a natural fiber. Compos Sci Technol 62:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ (2008) Handbook of green chemistry and technology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  26. Clauß B (2008) Fibers for ceramic matrix composites. In: Krenkel W (ed) Ceramic matrix composites: fiber reinforced ceramics and their applications. Wiley, pp 1–20, ISBN: 978-3-527-62240-5Google Scholar
  27. Cristaldi G, Latteri A, Recca G, Cicala G (2010) Composites based on natural fibre fabrics (Chap. 17). In: Dubrovski PD (eds) Woven Fabric Engineering, Sciyo, Rijeka, Croatia, November 2010, pp 317–342. ISBN 978-953-307-194-7Google Scholar
  28. Dam JEGV (1999) Optimisation of methods of fibre preparation from agricultural raw materials. Department of Fibres and Cellulose, Agrotechnological Research Institute, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  29. de Camargo JSG, de Menezes AJ, da Cruz NC, Rangel EC, Delgado-Silva AO (2018) Morphological and chemical effects of plasma treatment with oxygen (O2) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) on cellulose surface. Mater Res 20:842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Santos PA, Giriolli JC, Amarasekera J, Moraes G (2008) Natural fibers plastic composites for automotive applications. In: The 8th annual Society of Plastics Engineers’ (SPE) Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition (ACCE), Sept. 16–18, Michigan State University, Troy, Michigan, pp 12–21Google Scholar
  31. Fangueiro R (2011) Fibrous and composite materials for civil engineering applications. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink H-P, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frybort S, Mauritz R, Teischinger A, Müller U (2008) Cement bonded composites—a mechanical review. BioResources 3:602–626Google Scholar
  34. Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Possibilities for improving the mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites by alkali treatment of fibres. Compos Sci Technol 59:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gassan J, Gutowski VS (2000) Effects of corona discharge and UV treatment on the properties of jute-fibre epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:2857–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. George M, Mussone PG, Bressler DC (2014) Surface and thermal characterization of natural fibres treated with enzymes. Ind Crops Prod 53:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghavami K (1995) Ultimate load behaviour of bamboo-reinforced lightweight concrete beams. Cement Concr Compos 17:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goda K, Sreekala MS, Gomes A, Kaji T, Ohgi J (2006) Improvement of plant based natural fibers for toughening green composites—effect of load application during mercerization of ramie fibers. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37:2213–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gurunathan T, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2015) A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 77:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Han G, Lei Y, Wu Q, Kojima Y, Suzuki S (2008) Bamboo–fiber filled high density polyethylene composites: effect of coupling treatment and nanoclay. J Polym Environ 16:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Herrera-Franco PJ, Valadez-Gonzalez A (2004) Mechanical properties of continuous natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hill CAS (2007) Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley Series in Renewable Resource. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  43. Homan WJ, Jorissen AJM (2004) Wood modification developments. Heron 49:360–369Google Scholar
  44. Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of chemical modifications of the pineapple leaf fiber surfaces on the interfacial and mechanical properties of laminated biocomposites. Compos Interfaces 15:169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. John MJ, Anandjiwala RD (2008) Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 29:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Joseph K, Thomas S, Pavithran C (1996) Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polymer 37:5139–5149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Joseph S, Koshy P, Thomas S (2005) The role of interfacial interactions on the mechanical properties of banana fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Compos Interfaces 12:581–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Joseph S, Oommen Z, Thomas S (2006) Environmental durability of banana-fiber-reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. J Appl Polym Sci 100:2521–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Arora S (2004) Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 43:2883–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2013) Tensile properties of chemically treated hemp fibres as reinforcement for composites. Compos B Eng 53:362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keener TJ, Stuart RK, Brown TK (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keijzer MR, van Bommel I, Joosten A, Hartl AN, Proaño Gaibor AG, Heiss R, Kralofsky R, Erlach S (2013) The colours and dyeing techniques of prehistoric textiles from the salt mines of Hallstatt. In: Grömer K, Kern A, Reschreiter H, Rösel-Mautendorfer H (eds) Budapest, Hungaria, pp 135–162Google Scholar
  55. Kim JT, Netravali AN (2010) Mercerization of sisal fibers: effect of tension on mechanical properties of sisal fiber and fiber-reinforced composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:1245–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Konczewicz W, Kozłowski RM (2012) Enzymatic treatment of natural fibres. In: Kozłowski R (ed) Handbook of natural fibres, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, pp 168–184.  https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095510.1.168
  57. Koohestani B (2017) Effect of saline admixtures on mechanical and microstructural properties of cementitious matrices containing tailings. Constr Build Mater 156:1019–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koohestani B, Belem T, Koubaa A, Bussière B (2013) Investigation of natural fibres reinforced cemented paste backfill (NFR-CPB). In: Proceedings of the 66th canadian geotechnical conference and the 11th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC groundwater conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 29 to Thursday October 3, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  59. Koohestani B, Koubaa A, Belem T, Bussière B, Bouzahzah H (2016) Experimental investigation of mechanical and microstructural properties of cemented paste backfill containing maple-wood filler. Constr Build Mater 121:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Koohestani B, Bussière B, Belem T, Koubaa A (2017a) Influence of polymer powder on properties of cemented paste backfill. Int J Miner Process 167:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koohestani B, Ganetri I, Yilmaz E (2017b) Effects of silane modified minerals on mechanical, microstructural, thermal, and rheological properties of wood plastic composites. Compos B Eng 111:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Koohestani B, Darban AK, Darezereshki E, Mokhtari P, Yilmaz E, Yilmaz E (2018a) The influence of sodium and sulfate ions on total solidification and encapsulation potential of iron-rich acid mine drainage in silica gel. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3520–3527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Koohestani B, Khodadadi Darban A, Mokhtari P (2018b) A comparison between the influence of superplasticizer and organosilanes on different properties of cemented paste backfill. Constr Build Mater 173:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Koohestani B, Khodadadi Darban A, Yilmaz E, Mokhtari P, Ganetri I (2018c) Influence of amine and vinyl functional groups of silanes on total performance of thermoplastic-based composites. Constr Build Mater 172:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lopsik K (2013) Life cycle assessment of small-scale constructed wetland and extended aeration activated sludge wastewater treatment system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lu JZ, Wu Q, Negulescu II (2005) Wood-fiber/high-density-polyethylene composites: coupling agent performance. Appl Polym Sci 96:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lu T et al (2014) Effects of modifications of bamboo cellulose fibers on the improved mechanical properties of cellulose reinforced poly (lactic acid) composites. Compos B Eng 62:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Luz SM, Del Tio J, Rocha GJM, Gonçalves AR, Del’Arco AP (2008) Cellulose and cellulignin from sugarcane bagasse reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of acetylation on mechanical and thermal properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1362–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Malkapuram R, Kumar V, Negi YS (2009) Recent development in natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 28:1169–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mallick PK (2007) Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design, 3rd edn (Mechanical Engineering). CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  72. Marais S, Gouanvé F, Bonnesoeur A, Grenet J, Poncin-Epaillard F, Morvan C, Métayer M (2005) Unsaturated polyester composites reinforced with flax fibers: effect of cold plasma and autoclave treatments on mechanical and permeation properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36:975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Martin AR, Manolache S, Mattoso LHC, Rowell RM, Denes F (2000) Plasma modification of sisal on high density polyethylene composites: effect on mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on natural polymers and composites, May 14–17, Sao Pedro, SP, Brazil, pp 431–436Google Scholar
  74. Mohammed L, Ansari MN, Pua G, Jawaid M, Islam MS (2015) A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int J Polym Sci 2015:243947.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/243947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mohanty S, Nayak S, Verma S, Tripathy S (2004) Effect of MAPP as a coupling agent on the performance of jute–PP composites. Reinf Plast Compos 23:625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mohr BJ, Biernacki JJ, Kurtis KE (2007) Supplementary cementitious materials for mitigating degradation of kraft pulp fiber–cement composites. Cem Concr Res 37:1531–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Motta LAC, John VM, Agopyan V (2010) Thermo-mechanical treatment to improve properties of sisal fibres for composites. Mater Sci Forum 636–637:253–259.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Müller K et al (2017) Review on the processing and properties of polymer nanocomposites and nanocoatings and their applications in the packaging, automotive and solar energy fields. Nanomaterials 7:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mutje P, Vallejos ME, Girones J, Vilaseca F, Lopez A, Lopez JP, Mendez JA (2006) Effect of maleated polypropylene as coupling agent for polypropylene composites reinforced with hemp strands. Appl Polym Sci 102:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nam TH, Ogihara S, Tung NH, Kobayashi S (2011) Effect of alkali treatment on interfacial and mechanical properties of coir fiber reinforced poly (butylene succinate) biodegradable composites. Compos B Eng 42:1648–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nishino T, Hirao K, Kotera M (2006) X-ray diffraction studies on stress transfer of kenaf reinforced poly (l-lactic acid) composite. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37:2269–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nouri J, Nouri N, Moeeni M (2012) Development of industrial waste disposal scenarios using life-cycle assessment approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pehanich JL, Blankenhorn PR, Silsbee MR (2004) Wood fiber surface treatment level effects on selected mechanical properties of wood fiber–cement composites. Cem Concr Res 34:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pickering K (2008) Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 83:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ragoubi M, Bienaimé D, Molina S, George B, Merlin A (2010) Impact of corona treated hemp fibres onto mechanical properties of polypropylene composites made thereof. Ind Crops Prod 31:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ragoubi M, George B, Molina S, Bienaimé D, Merlin A, Hiver JM, Dahoun A (2012) Effect of corona discharge treatment on mechanical and thermal properties of composites based on miscanthus fibres and polylactic acid or polypropylene matrix. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43:675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR (2001) The mechanical properties of vinylester resin matrix composites reinforced with alkali-treated jute fibres. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 32:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rout J, Misra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK (2001) The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1303–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Saba N, Tahir PM, Jawaid M (2014) A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites. Polymers 6:2247–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Seki Y, Sever K, Sarikanat M, Gulec HA, Tavman IH (2009) The influence of oxygen plasma treatment of jute fibres on mechanical properties of jute fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Paper presented at the 5th international advanced technologies symposium TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  92. Shishoo R (2007) Plasma technologies for textiles. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sobral HS (2004) Vegetable plants and their fibres as building materials. In: Proceedings of the second international RILEM symposium. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  94. Sreekala M, Kumaran M, Joseph S, Jacob M, Thomas S (2000) Oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites: influence of fibre surface modifications on the mechanical performance. Appl Compos Mater 7:295–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Švegl F, Šuput-Strupi J, Škrlep L, Kalcher K (2008) The influence of aminosilanes on macroscopic properties of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 38:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Toledo Filho RD, Ghavami K, England GL, Scrivener K (2003) Development of vegetable fibre–mortar composites of improved durability. Cement Concr Compos 25:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999a) Chemical modification of henequen fibers with an organosilane coupling agent. Compos B Eng 30:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999b) Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng 30:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van de Weyenberg I, Truong TC, Vangrimde B, Verpoest I (2006) Improving the properties of UD flax fibre reinforced composites by applying an alkaline fibre treatment. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1368–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. van Vuure A (2008) Natural fibre composites; recent developments. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  101. Verma D, Jain S, Zhang X, Gope PC (2016) Green approaches to biocomposite materials science and engineering. IGI Global, HersheyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Vuure V et al (2013) Natural fibre composites: recent developments. In: 5th Eucass-European conference for aerospace sciences, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  103. Williams T, Hosur M, Theodore M, Netravali A, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2011) Time effects on morphology and bonding ability in mercerized natural fibers for composite reinforcement. Int J Polym Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/192865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Xiaowen Y, Jayaraman K, Bhattacharyya D (2004) Mechanical properties of plasma-treated sisal fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Adhes Sci Technol 18:1027–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C (2010) Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: a review. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:806–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Xu X, Jayaraman K, Morin C, Pecqueux N (2008) Life cycle assessment of wood-fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Mater Process Technol 198:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Xu A, Wang J, Wang H (2010) Effects of anionic structure and lithium salts addition on the dissolution of cellulose in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquid solvent systems. Green Chem 12:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Xue Y, Veazie DR, Glinsey C, Horstemeyer MF, Rowell RM (2007) Environmental effects on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of aspen fiber–polypropylene composites. Compos B Eng 38:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Yi X-S, Du S, Zhang L (2017) Composite materials engineering, Volume 1: Fundamentals of composite materials. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  110. Yu S, Yang S, Cho M (2009) Multi-scale modeling of cross-linked epoxy nanocomposites. Polymer 50:945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yuan X, Jayaraman K, Bhattacharyya D (2004) Effects of plasma treatment in enhancing the performance of woodfibre-polypropylene composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:1363–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zafeiropoulos NE (2011) Interface engineering of natural fibre composites for maximum performance. Woodhead Publishing, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zafeiropoulos NE, Baillie CA, Hodgkinson JM (2002a) Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part II. The effect of surface treatments on the interface. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 33:1185–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zafeiropoulos NE, Williams DR, Baillie CA, Matthews FL (2002b) Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part I. Development and investigation of surface treatments. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 33:1083–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zaman AU (2013) Identification of waste management development drivers and potential emerging waste treatment technologies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zhou Y, Fan M, Chen L (2016) Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 101:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mining, and Mineral ProcessingTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Université du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueRouyn-NorandaCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  4. 4.Materials Science and Nano EngineeringSabanci UniversityTuzlaTurkey
  5. 5.First Quantum Minerals Ltd., Cayeli Bakir Isletmeleri A.S.Madenli, CayeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations