Advertisement

Fine-template synthetic process of mesoporous TiO2 using ionic/nonionic surfactants as potential remediation of Pb(II) from contaminated soil

  • M. M. KhalafEmail author
  • N. Y. Abdallah
  • H. M. Abd El-Lateef
Original Paper

Abstract

This trend of research deals with preparation of mesoporous TiO2 by a simple approach using sol–gel method by various surfactant templates. The designed nano-adsorbents TiO2 were featured by various characterization methods of Fourier transform infrared, X-ray diffraction, surface area analysis (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller), transmission electron microscope, and scanning electron microscope. These obtained nano-adsorbents are examined as functional adsorbents for lead ions up taking from contaminated soil specimens. The results presented the effect of ionic and nonionic surfactant templates on the texture of the three types of mesoporous TiO2 nano-adsorbents. The effects of the temperature, pH, and amount of nano-adsorbents TiO2 on the adsorption process were studied. The optimum conditions of 25 °C, 5, and 0.1 g were obtained for temperature, pH, and amount of adsorbents, respectively. The obtained results revealed that about 97.6, 99.1, and 95.3% of total adsorptive capacity were obtained for Ti C, Ti S, and Ti P, respectively, at 100 mg L−1 of Pb(II) ions in soil solutions during 120 min. The adsorption isotherm and the thermodynamic parameters were further illustrated. These findings recommended these nano-adsorbent TiO2 as adequate adsorbents in remediation process of Pb-enriched soil.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Mesoporous TiO2 Adsorption capacity Soil remediation Lead(II) Surfactant template 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

References

  1. Adetutu EM, Bird C, Kadali KK, Bueti A, Shahsavari E, Taha M, Patil S, Sheppard PJ, Makadia T, Simons KL, Ball AS (2015) Exploiting the intrinsic hydrocarbon-degrading microbial capacities in oil tank bottom sludge and waste soil for sludge bioremediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1427–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J, Bolan NS (2004) Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 122:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2006) Instrumental methods in metal ions speciation: chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and electrochemistry. Taylor & Francis Ltd, New York. ISBN 0-8493-3736-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali I, Jain CK (2004) Advances in arsenic speciation techniques. Int J Environ Anal Chem 84(12):947–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY, Gupta VK (2009) Nano chromatography and capillary electrophoresis: pharmaceutical and environmental analyses. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. ISBN 978-0-470-17851-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali I, Gupta VK, Khan TA, Asim M (2012) Removal of arsenate from aqueous solution by electro-coagulation method using Al–Fe electrodes. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:1898–1907Google Scholar
  7. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Alwarthan A, Asim M, Khan TA (2014) Removal of arsenic species from water by batch and column operations on bagasse fly ash. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(5):3218–3229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Sanagi MM (2015) Green synthesis of iron nano-impregnated adsorbent for fast removal of fluoride from water. J Mol Liq 211:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ali I, Othman ZA AL, Al-Warthan A (2016a) Sorption, kinetics and thermodynamics studies of atrazine herbicide removal from water using iron nano-composite material. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Alharbi OM (2016b) Uptake of pantoprazole drug residue from water using novel synthesized composite iron nano adsorbent. J Mol Liq 218:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Al-Warthan A (2016c) A Removal of secbumeton herbicide from water on composite nanoadsorbent. Desalin Water Treat 57(22):10409–10421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ali I, Alothman ZA, Alwarthan A (2016d) Synthesis of composite iron nano adsorbent and removal of ibuprofen drug residue from water. J Mol Liq 219:858–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ali I, Alothman ZA, Alharbi OML (2017a) Supra molecular mechanism of the removal of 17-β-estradiol endocrine disturbing pollutant from water on functionalized iron nano particles. J Mol Liq 441:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ali I, Alothman ZA, Alwarthan A (2017b) Uptake of propranolol on ionic liquid iron nanocomposite adsorbent: kinetic, thermodynamics and mechanism of adsorption. J Mol Liq 236:203–205Google Scholar
  15. Ali I, Alharbi OML, Alothman ZA, Badjah AY, Alwarthan A, Basheer A (2018) Artificial neural network modelling of amido black dye sorption on iron composite nano material: kinetics and thermodynamics studies. J Mol Liq 250:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Arivoli S, Thenkuzhali M (2008) Kinetic, mechanistic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies on the adsorption of Rhodamine B by acid activated low cost carbon. E-J Chem 5:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen YF, Lee CY, Yeng MY, Chiu HT (2003) The effect of calcination temperature on the crystallinity of TiO2 nanopowder. J Cryst Growth 247:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen K, Li J, Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang X, Su H (2012) Effects of surfactants on microstructure and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the hydrothermal method. Mater Sci Semicond Process 15(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen J, Feng J, Yan W (2015) Facile synthesis of a polythiophene/TiO2 particle composite in aqueous medium and its adsorption performance for Pb(II). RSC Adv 5:86945–86953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi H, Stathatos E, Dionysiou DD (2006) Synthesis of nano-crystalline photocatalytic TiO2 thin films and particles using sol-gel method modified with nonionic surfactants. Thin Solid Films 510(1–2):107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dehghani MH, Sanaei D, Ali I, Bhatnagar A (2016) Removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using treated waste newspaper as a low-cost adsorbent: kinetic modeling and isotherm studies. J Mol Liq 215:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ding CC, Cheng WC, Sun YB, Wang XK (2015) Effects of Bacillus subtilis on the reduction of U(VI) by nano-Fe0. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 165:86–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Du W, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Ji R, Yin Y, Zhu J, Peralta Videa JR, Guo H (2015) Physiological and biochemical changes imposed by CeO2 nanoparticles on wheat: a life cycle field study. Environ Sci Technol 49(19):11884–11893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fang Q-R, Makal TA, Young MD, Zhou H-C (2010) Recent advances in the study of mesoporous metal-organic frameworks. Comments Inorg Chem 31:165–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farghali AA, Bahgat M, Allah AE, Khedr MH (2013) Adsorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions using copper oxide nanostructures. Beni-suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 2:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gundogdu A, Ozdes D, Duran C, Bulut VN, Soylak M, Senturk HB (2009) Bio-sorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by pine bark (Pinus brutia Ten.). Chem Eng J 153:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta VK, Ali I (2012) Environmental water: advances in treatment, remediation and recycling. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho and McKay (2009) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. The Can J Chem Eng 76:822–827Google Scholar
  30. Jain AK, Gupta VK, Suhas BA (2003) Utilization of industrial waste products as adsorbents for the removal of dyes. J Hazard Mater 101:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jin ZX, Sheng J, Sun YB (2014) Characterization of radioactive cobalt on graphene oxide by macroscopic and spectroscopic techniques. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:1979–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jin Z, Gaoc HI, Hu L (2015) Removal of Pb(II) by nano-titanium oxide investigated by batch, XPS and model techniques. RSC Adv 5:88520–88528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M (2009) Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks. Environ Health Perspect 117(12):1813–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khalaf MM, Abd El-Lateef HM (2016) Corrosion protection of mild steel by coating with TiO2 thin films co-doped with NiO and ZrO2 in acidic chloride environments. Mater Chem Phys 177:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khalaf MM, El-Lateef HA (2017) Impact of porosity and thickness of nano-TiO2 films on the corrosion protection performance of C-steel in H2SO4. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 14:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khamforoush M, Bijan-Manesh M-J, Hatami T (2013) Application of the Haug model for process design of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil bioremediation by composting process. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:533–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khan TA, Sharma S (2011) Adsorption of Rhodamine B dye from aqueous solution onto acid activated mango (Magnifera indica) leaf powder: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Toxicol Environ Health Sci 3(10):286–297Google Scholar
  38. Khan SB, Rahman MM, Asiri AM, Marwani HM, Bawaked SM, Alamry KA (2013) Co3O4 co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as a selective marker of lead in aqueous solution. New J Chem 37:2888–2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lagadic IL, Mitchell MK, Payne BD (2001) Highly effective adsorption of heavy metal ions by a thio-functionalized magnesium phyllosilicate clay. Environ Sci Technol 35:984–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li L, Duan H, Wang X, Luo C (2014) Adsorption property of Cr(VI) on magnetic meso-porous titanium dioxide–graphene oxide core–shell microspheres. New J Chem 38:6008–6016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu AX, Wang JH, Qin XY, Wang KY, Han P, Zhang SZ (2012) Multivariate and geo- statistical analyses of the spatial distribution and origin of heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunyi, Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 425:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magrisso S, Erel Y, Belkin S (2008) Microbial reporters of metal bioavailability. Antimicrob Biotechnol 1:320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McLaughlin MJ, Zarcinas BA, Stevens DP, Cook N (2000) Soil testing for heavy metals. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 311:1661–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rafati L, Ehrampoush MH, Rafati AA, Mokhtari M, Mahvi AH (2018) Removal of ibuprofen from aqueous solution by functionalized strong nano-clay composite adsorbent: kinetic and equilibrium isotherm studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raya PZ, Shipley HJ (2015) Inorganic nano-adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals and arsenic: a review. RSC Adv 5:29885–29907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ren T-Z, Yuan Z-Y, Su B-L (2003) Surfactant-assisted preparation of hollow micro-spheres of mesoporous TiO2. Chem Phys Lett 374(1–2):170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shao GN, Elineema G, Quang DV et al (2012) Two step synthesis of a mesoporous titania-silica composite from titanium oxychloride and sodium silicate. Powder Technol 217:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shirani M, Akbaria A, Hassani M (2015) Adsorption of cadmium(II) and copper(II) from soil and water samples onto a magnetic organozeolite modified with 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1,3- dithiane using an artificial neural network and analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Methods 7:6012–6020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shotyk W, Le Roux G (2005) Biogeochemistry and cycling of lead. Met Ions BiolSyst 43:239–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stingu A, Volf I, Popa VI, Gostin I (2012) New approaches concerning the utilization of natural amendments in cadmium phytoremediation. Ind Crops Prod 35:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutradhar N, Pahari SK, Jayachandran M, Stephan AM, Nair JR, Subramanian B, Bajaj HC, Modya HM, Panda AB (2013) Organic free low temperature direct synthesis of hierarchical protonated layered titanates/anatase TiO2 hollow spheres and their task-specific applications. J Mater Chem A 1:9122–9131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tan XL, Fan QH, Wang XK, Grambow B (2009) Eu(III) sorption to TiO2 (anatase and rutile): batch, XPS, and EXAFS studies. Environ Sci Technol 43:3115–3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Udeigwe TK, Eze PN, Teboh JM, Stietiya MH (2011) Application, chemistry, and environmental implications of contaminant-immobilization amendments on agricultural soil and water quality. Environ Int 37:258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecology 2011:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yanagisawa H, Matsumoto Y, Machida M (2010) Adsorption of Zn(II) and Cd(II) ions onto magnesium and activated carbon composite in aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci 256:1619–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang MK, Pu JC (2011) Mineral materials as feasible amendments to stabilize heavy metals in polluted urban soils. J Environ Sci (China) 23:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao XW, Jia Q, Song NZ, Zhou WH, Li YS (2010) Adsorption of Pb(II) from an aqueous solution by titanium dioxide/carbon nanotube nanocomposites: kinetics, thermodynamics, and isotherms. J Chem Eng Data 55:4428–4433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhao DL, Sheng GD, Hu J, Chen CL, Wang XK (2011) The adsorption of Pb(II) on Mg2Al layered double hydroxide. Chem Eng J 171:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zheng K, Zheng X, Yu F, Ma J (2016) Removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solution using long TiO2 nanotubes with a high specific surface area. RSC Adv 6:3625–3631CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Khalaf
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • N. Y. Abdallah
    • 3
  • H. M. Abd El-Lateef
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, College of ScienceKing Faisal UniversityAl Hofuf, Al HassaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceSohag UniversitySohagEgypt
  3. 3.Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of ScienceSohag UniversitySohagEgypt

Personalised recommendations