Advertisement

Removal and confinement of Hg(II) by polyurethane foam functionalized with potassium O-ethyldithiocarbonate

  • J. F. Flores-Aguilar
  • C. A. Galán-Vidal
  • J. A. Rodríguez
  • J. G. Alvarado-Rodríguez
  • M. E. Páez-HernándezEmail author
Original Paper
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Polyurethane foam functionalized with potassium O-ethyldithiocarbonate was evaluated as an extractant material for Hg(II). Several parameters such as pH, mass amount and extraction time were studied. Under the best conditions, a 86% of mercury extraction was achieved. Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm model indicated that the nature of interaction between functionalized foam and Hg(II) is chemical. Regarding interferents, metallic ions Ag(I) and Sn(IV) have a significant influence on the Hg extraction percentage. In the case of silver, it had a synergistic effect increasing the percentage of mercury due to a metallophilic interaction. Also, once the mercury was extracted, its leaching from the functionalized polyurethane foam was evaluated by means of two sequential extraction procedures. In this way, the functionalized foam emerges as a good material for the removal and confinement of chemical species. Obtained results show that mercury extraction is successful even from complex solution and that mercury-foam material is stable under extreme chemical and temperature conditions.

Keywords

Functionalization Leaching Mercury O-ethyldithiocarbonate Polyurethane foam 

Notes

Acknowledgements

MEPH acknowledges PAI-UAEH for the financial support for the project UAEH-DI-ICBI-QU-SF-029. JFFA is grateful for their postgraduate studies grant (CONACYT-402382). MEPH, CAGV, JARA and JGAR gratefully thank the SNI for the distinction of their membership.

References

  1. Azeem SM, Arafa WA, el-Shahat MF (2010) Synthesis and application of alizarin complex one functionalized polyurethane foam: preconcentration/separation of metal ions from tap water and human urine. J Hazard Mater 182:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biester H, Scholz C (1997) Determination of mercury binding forms in contaminated soils: mercury pyrolysis versus sequential extractions. Environ Sci Technol 31:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandrasekhar Reddy P, Rangamannar B (1996) Comparative substoichiometric extraction and quantification of mercury in geological water samples with potassium salts of ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl and benzyl xanthates. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 213:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corcuera MA, Rueda L, Fernandez d’Arlas B, Arbelaiz A, Marieta C, Mondragon I, Eceiza A (2010) Microstructure and properties of polyurethanes derived from castor oil. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2175–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuéllar Burgos A, Mesa Rueda FA, Vargas Hérnandez C, Perilla Perilla JE (2010) Characterization of polyurethane-urea/montmorillonite nanocomposites using XRD and µ-Raman. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia 54:57–64Google Scholar
  6. de Jesus DS, Cassella RJ, Costa SL, Spinolla AC, de Carvalho MS, Santelli RE (1998) Polyurethane foam as a sorbent for continuous flow analysis: preconcentration and spectrophotometric determination of zinc in biological materials. Anal Chim Acta 366:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehghani MH, Mahdavi P, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Investigating the toxicity of acid dyes from textile effluent under UV/ZnO process using Daphnia magna. Desalin Water Treat 57:24359–24367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denizli A, Kesenci K, Arica Y, Pişkin E (2000) Dithiocarbamate-incorporated monosize polystyrene microspheres for selective removal of mercury ions. React Funct Polym 44:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dmitrienko SG, Sviridova OA, Pyatkova LN, Myshak EN, Shelmenkova OV, Zolotov YA (2000) Chemical reactions of terminal groups in polyurethane foams. Mendeleev Commun 10:244–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dujardin MC, Cazé C, Vroman I (2000) Ion-exchange resins bearing thiol groups to remove mercury. Part 1: synthesis and use of polymers prepared from thioester supported resin. React Funct Polym 43:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erdem A, Shahwan T, Çağir A, Eroğlu AE (2011) Synthesis of aminopropyl triethoxysilane-functionalized silica and its application in speciation studies of vanadium(IV) and vanadium(V). Chem Eng J 174:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Essandoh M, Wolgemuth D, Pittman CU Jr, Mohan D, Mlsna T (2017) Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4577–4590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Community (2003) council decision establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC. 2003/33/ECGoogle Scholar
  14. Farag AB, Soliman MH, Abdel-Rasoul OS, El-Shahawi MS (2007) Sorption characteristics and chromatographic separation of gold (I and III) from silver and base metal ions using polyurethane foams. Anal Chim Acta 601:218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavilán-García IC, Fernández-Villagomez G, Gavilán-García A, Alcántara-Concepcion V (2015) Alternatives of management and disposal for mercury thermometers at the end of their life from Mexican health care institutions. J Clean Prod 86:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gnanasekaran L, Hamamalini R, Saravanan R, Ravichandran K, Gracia F, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2017) Synthesis and characterization of metal oxides (CeO2, CuO, NiO, Mn3O4, SnO2 and ZnO) nanoparticles as photo catalysts for degradation of textile dyes. J Photochem Photobiol B 173:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saleh TA, Nayak A, Agarwal S (2012) Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling-an overview. RSC Adv 2:6380–6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta VK, Saravanan R, Agarwal S, Gracia F, Khan MM, Qin J, Mangalaraja RV (2017) Degradation of azo dyes under different wavelengths of UV light with chitosan-SnO2 nanocomposites. J Mol Liq 232:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hupf E, Lork E, Mebs S, Beckmann J (2015) 6-Diphenylphosphinoacenaphth-5-yl-mercurials as ligands for d10 metals. Observation of closed-shell Interactions of the Type Hg(II)···M; M = Hg(II), Ag(I), Au(I). Inorg Chem 54:1847–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Javni I, Petrović ZS, Guo A, Fuller R (2000) Thermal stability of polyurethanes based on vegetable oils. J Appl Polym Sci 77:1723–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemos VA, Santos MS, Santos ES, Santos MJS, dos Santos WNL, Souza AS, de Jesus DS, das Virgens CF, Carvalho MS, das Virgens N, Oleszczuk N, Vale MGR, Welz B, Ferreira SLC (2007) Application of polyurethane foam as a sorbent for trace metal pre-concentration—A review. Spectrochim Acta B 62:4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. López FA, Alguacil FJ, Rodríguez O, Sierra MJ, Millán R (2015) Mercury leaching from hazardous industrial wastes stabilized by sulfur polymer encapsulation. Waste Manag 35:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahfuz H, Rangari VK, Islam MS, Jeelani S (2004) Fabrication, synthesis and mechanical characterization of nanoparticles infused polyurethane foams. Compos Part A-Appl S 35:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller WP, McFee WW (1983) Distribution of cadmium, zinc, copper and lead in soils of industrialized northwestern Indiana. J Environ Qual 12:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakamoto K (2009) Infrared and Raman Spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. Part B. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. Nekouei F, Nekouei S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK (2015) Kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies for acid blue 129 removal from liquids using copper oxide nanoparticle-modified activated carbon as a novel adsorbent. J Mol Liq 201:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oskoei V, Dehghani MH, Nazmara S, Heibati B, Asif A, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Removal of humic acid from aqueous solution using UV/ZnO nano-photocatalysis and adsorption. J Mol Liq 213:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Sundseth K, Munthe J, Kindbom K, Wilson S, Steenhuisen F, Maxson P (2010) Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos Environ 44:2487–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patel U, Sharma S, Singh HB, Dey S, Jain VK, Wolmershäuser G, Butcher RJ (2010a) Intermetallic bonds in metallophilic mercuraazametallamacrocycles of synthetic design. Organometallics 29:4265–4275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patel VK, Mishra AK, Vishwakarma NK, Biswas CS, Ray B (2010b) (S)-2-(Ethyl propionate)-(O-ethyl xanthate) and (S)-2-(Ethyl isobutyrate)-(O-ethyl xanthate)-mediated RAFT polymerization of N-vinylpyrrolidone. Polym Bull 65:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman RB, Friedli HR, Leaner J, Mason R, Mukherjee AB, Stracher GB, Streets DG, Telmer K (2010) Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10:5951–5964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Puigdomenech I (2015) MEDUSA program. KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. https://www.kth.se/en/che/medusa/downloads-1.386254. Accessed 26 Apr 2017
  33. Qu R, Sun C, Ma F, Cui Z, Zhang Y, Sun X, Ji C, Wang C, Yin P (2012) Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium of copper from ethanol fuel on silica-gel functionalized with amino-terminated dendrimer-like polyamidoamine polymers. Fuel 92:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robaina NF, Soriano S, Cassella RJ (2009) Polyurethane foam loaded with SDS for the adsorption of cationic dyes from aqueous medium: multivariate optimization of the loading process. J Hazard Mater 167:653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robati D, Mirza B, Rajabi M, Moradi O, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Removal of hazardous dyes-BR 12 and methyl orange using graphene oxide as an adsorbent from aqueous phase. Chem Eng J 284:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saha MC, Kabir MdE, Jeelani S (2008) Enhancement in thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane foam infused with nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A 479:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Santos OSH, da Silva MC, Silva VR, Mussel WN, Yoshida MI (2017) Polyurethane foam impregnated with lignin as a filler for the removal of crude oil from contaminated water. J Hazard Mater 324:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saravanan R, Khan MM, Gupta VK, Mosquera E, Gracia F, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2015) ZnO/Ag/CdO nanocomposite for visible light-induced photocatalytic degradation of industrial textile effluents. J Colloid Interf Sci 452:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith E, Dent G (2004) Modern Raman Spectroscopy: a practical approach. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USEPA (2015) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Priority Pollutant List. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/priority-pollutant-list-epa.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2017

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Área Académica de QuímicaUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de HidalgoMineral de la ReformaMexico

Personalised recommendations