Advertisement

Investigation of the effect of HZSM-5 over HDS and reforming processes for clean gasoline production

  • K. Sharifi
  • R. HalladjEmail author
  • S. Javid Royaee
  • M. Reza Jafari Nasr
Original Paper

Abstract

HZSM-5 catalysts with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios were synthesized, and the effect of acidity over the octane enhancement alongside with desulfurization of heavy naphtha was investigated. In this way, the catalysts with the SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of 20, 40, 60, 80 and 200 were experimentally synthesized and their physical characteristics besides their acidities were measured through X-ray diffraction, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller and temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) tests. All of them were examined under a specific condition of 5 barg pressure, 450 °C temperature, H2/Oil = 150 ml/Nml, and weight hourly space velocity = 1 h−1 inside a fixed bed reactor. To measure liquid hydrocarbon compositions, analyses of the off-gases, the value of research octane number and the amount of total sulfur of the feed and products were done by means of some tests, including the standard of detailed hydrocarbon analysis, gas chromatography, ASTM D-2699 and ASTM-D5453 utilized, respectively. At SiO2/Al2O3 = 40, the amount of total sulfur went down by 74 wt% and the amount of the Research Octane Number hopefully increased from 51.9 to 93. However, analysis of off-gases stated that despite decreasing the amount of sulfur and increasing the value of octane number in the outlet yields, the ratio of 40 ratio led to by-production of light hydrocarbons, besides 76% liquid yield inevitably. Depending on the results, by using the proposed parallel aromatization–desulfurization process, engineers could bring together the HDS and CRU processes and could diminish the capital and operating costs.

Keywords

Desulfurization Aromatization HZSM-5 Acidity Octane number 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted at Amirkabir University of Technology. Additionally, we thank our colleagues from Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (in Iran) who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

References

  1. Anderson JE, DiCicco DM, Ginder JM, Kramer U, Leone TG, Raney-Pablo HE, Wallington TJ (2012) High octane number ethanol–gasoline blends: quantifying the potential benefits in the united states. Fuel 97(Supplement C):585–594. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236112002268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.017
  2. Bakhtiari G, Abdouss M, Bazmi M, Royaee SJ (2016) Optimization of sulfur adsorption over ag-zeolite nanoadsorbent by experimental design method. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(3):803–812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0910-2 Google Scholar
  3. Baradaran S, Sohrabi M, Bijani P, Royaee S, Sahebdelfar S (2014) An investigation on isobutane aromatization over an h-zsm-5 catalyst. Pet Sci Technol 32(23):2889–2895Google Scholar
  4. Baradaran S, Sohrabi M, Moghimpour Bijani P, Royaee SJ, Sahebdelfar S (2015) Experimental and modelling study of propane aromatization over h-zsm-5 catalysts prepared by different silica sources. Can J Chem Eng 93(4):727–735Google Scholar
  5. Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WE, Teller E (1940) On a theory of the van der Waals adsorption of gases. J Am Chem Soc 62(7):1723–1732Google Scholar
  6. Erofeev VI, Khomyakov I, Egorova L (2014) Production of high-octane gasoline from straight-run gasoline on zsm-5 modified zeolites. Theor Found Chem Eng 48(1):71–76Google Scholar
  7. Ertan S, Şen F, Şen S, Gökağaç G (2012) Platinum nanocatalysts prepared with different surfactants for c1–c3 alcohol oxidations and their surface morphologies by afm. J Nanopart Res 14(6):922Google Scholar
  8. Gary JH, Handwerk GE, Kaiser MJ (2007) Petroleum refining: technology and economics. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidarinasab A, Soltanieh M, Ardjmand M, Ahmadpanahi H, Bahmani M (2016) Comparison of mo/mgo and mo/γ-al2o3 catalysts: impact of support on the structure and dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization reaction pathways. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(4):1065–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0949-8 Google Scholar
  10. Jaimes L, Ferreira ML, de Lasa H (2009) Thiophene conversion under mild conditions over a zsm-5 catalyst. Chem Eng Sci 64(11):2539–2561Google Scholar
  11. Liu X, Yang D, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Luo L, Meng S, Chen S, Tan M, Li Z, Tang L (2017) Electrocatalytic properties of n-doped graphite felt in electro-fenton process and degradation mechanism of levofloxacin. Chemosphere 182:306–315Google Scholar
  12. Long H, Jin F, Xiong G, Wang X (2014) Effect of lanthanum and phosphorus on the aromatization activity of zn/zsm-5 in fcc gasoline upgrading. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 198:29–34Google Scholar
  13. Ozturk Z, Sen F, Sen S, Gokagac G (2012) The preparation and characterization of nano-sized pt–pd/c catalysts and comparison of their superior catalytic activities for methanol and ethanol oxidation. J Mater Sci 47(23):8134–8144Google Scholar
  14. Rahimpour MR, Jafari M, Iranshahi D (2013) Progress in catalytic naphtha reforming process: a review. Appl Energy 109:79–93Google Scholar
  15. Rodríguez-González L, Hermes F, Bertmer M, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Jiménez-López A, Simon U (2007) The acid properties of h-zsm-5 as studied by nh 3-tpd and 27 al-mas-nmr spectroscopy. Appl Catal A 328(2):174–182Google Scholar
  16. Şen F, Gökaĝaç G (2008) Improving catalytic efficiency in the methanol oxidation reaction by inserting ru in face-centered cubic pt nanoparticles prepared by a new surfactant, tert-octanethiol. Energy Fuels 22(3):1858–1864Google Scholar
  17. Şen F, Gökaǧaç G (2007) Different sized platinum nanoparticles supported on carbon: an xps study on these methanol oxidation catalysts. J Phys Chem C 111(15):5715–5720Google Scholar
  18. Şen F, Şen S, Gökağaç G (2011a) Efficiency enhancement of methanol/ethanol oxidation reactions on pt nanoparticles prepared using a new surfactant, 1, 1-dimethyl heptanethiol. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(4):1676–1684Google Scholar
  19. Şen S, Şen F, Gökağaç G (2011b) Preparation and characterization of nano-sized pt–ru/c catalysts and their superior catalytic activities for methanol and ethanol oxidation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(15):6784–6792Google Scholar
  20. Shafi R, Hutchings GJ (2000) Hydrodesulfurization of hindered dibenzothiophenes: an overview. Catal Today 59(3):423–442Google Scholar
  21. Song C (2003) An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. Catal Today 86(1):211–263Google Scholar
  22. Tonetto G, Atias J, De Lasa H (2004) Fcc catalysts with different zeolite crystallite sizes: acidity, structural properties and reactivity. Appl Catal A 270(1):9–25Google Scholar
  23. Tshabalala TE, Scurrell MS (2015) Aromatization of n-hexane over ga, mo and zn modified h-zsm-5 zeolite catalysts. Catal Commun 72:49–52Google Scholar
  24. van Arkel P, Beens J, Spaans H, Grutterink D, Verbeek R (1987) Automated pna analysis of naphthas and other hydrocarbon samples. J Chromatogr Sci 25(4):141–148Google Scholar
  25. Viswanadham N, Kamble R, Saxena SK, Singh M (2008) Enhanced octane boosting reactions of light naphtha on mesoporous zsm-5. Catal Commun 9(9):1894–1897Google Scholar
  26. Viswanadham N, Saxena SK, Garg M (2013) Octane number enhancement studies of naphtha over noble metal loaded zeolite catalysts. J Ind Eng Chem 19(3):950–955Google Scholar
  27. Worldwide Fuel Charter. 5th edn. September 2013. https://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/Worldwide_Fuel_Charter_5ed_2013.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2017
  28. Yin C, Liu C (2004) Hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha over zeolite-supported ni-mo-s catalysts. Appl Catal A 273(1):177–184Google Scholar
  29. Zhao L, Chen Y, Gao J, Chen Y (2010) Desulfurization mechanism of fcc gasoline: a review. Front Chem Eng China 4(3):314–321Google Scholar
  30. Zhou Y, Liu X, Tang L, Zhang F, Zeng G, Peng X, Luo L, Deng Y, Pang Y, Zhang J (2017) Insight into highly efficient co-removal of p-nitrophenol and lead by nitrogen-functionalized magnetic ordered mesoporous carbon: performance and modelling. J Hazard Mater 333:80–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sharifi
    • 1
  • R. Halladj
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Javid Royaee
    • 2
  • M. Reza Jafari Nasr
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical EngineeringAmirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)TehranIran
  2. 2.Petroleum Refining Division, Research Institute of Petroleum IndustryTehranIran
  3. 3.Research Institute of Petroleum IndustryTehranIran

Personalised recommendations