Application of an agro-industrial waste for the removal of As (III) in a counter-current multiphase fluidized bed

  • D. De
  • V. Aniya
  • B. SatyavathiEmail author
Original Paper


Arsenic pollution in groundwater has been identified as a major hazard in developing countries. In this purview, Karanja or Pongamia pinnata seed cake, a biodiesel residue has been proposed to being utilized to curb the arsenic menace using an agro-industrial waste. The study investigates the biosorption of As (III) onto thermally activated de-oiled karanja seed cake (TAKB) with a surface area of 19.8 m2⁄g in a counter-current multiphase fluidized bed column. Experiments were designed with the aid of a full factorial central composite design to study the effect of five different process variables on the percentage adsorption of As (III). The maximum uptake capacity of the biosorbent was obtained to be 0.226 mg/g which was comparable to other reported biosorbents. Multiple regression analysis was used to derive a quadratic polynomial that developed a correlation between the independent process parameters and the percentage removal of As (III) together the analysis of variance . The optimum parameters for maximum percentage removal of As (III) were determined to be an initial As (III) concentration of 0.378 mg/L, gas and liquid flow rates of 0.224 and 0.074 L/min, respectively, static bed height of 0.069 m and the average particle size of the biosorbent as 1.73 mm. Isotherm studies based on Langmuir and Freundlich models were also conducted in order to estimate the maximum sorption capacity of TAKB. A confirmatory test with groundwater at optimum conditions for real-time application was performed, and 93.17% As (III) removal was attained.


Arsenic Biosorption Karanja Fluidization Response surface methodology Waste management 



We acknowledge Prof. V. V. Mahajani, ICT, Mumbai, India, for his valuable suggestions during the entire course of study.


  1. Abejon A, Garea A, Irabien A (2015) Arsenic removal from drinking water by reverse osmosis: minimization of costs and energy consumption. Sep Purif Technol 144:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkaya R, Akkaya B (2013) Adsorption isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and desorption studies for uranium and thorium ions from aqueous solution by novel microporous composite P (HEMA-EP). J Nucl Mater 434:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aksu Z, Ferda GF (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39(599):613Google Scholar
  4. Amin MdN, Kaneco S, Kitagawa T, Begum A, Katsumata H, Suzuki T, Ohta K (2006) Removal of Arsenic in Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Waste Rice Husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8105–8110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aniya VK, Muktham RK, Alka K, Satyavathi B (2015) Modeling and simulation of batch kinetics of non-edible karanja oil for biodiesel production: a mass transfer study. Fuel 161:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aryal M, Ziagova M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M (2010) Study on arsenic biosorption using Fe (III)-treated biomass of Staphylococcus xylosus. Chem Eng J 162:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baig JA, Kazi TG, Shah AQ, Kandhro GA, Afridi HI, Khan S, Kolachi NF (2010) Biosorption studies on powder of stem of Acacia nilotica: removal of arsenic from surface water. J Hazard Mater 178:941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee A, Sarkar P, Banerjee S (2016) Application of statistical design of experiments for optimization of As(V) biosorption by immobilized bacterial biomass. Ecol Eng 86:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boddu VM, Abburi K, Talbott JL, Smith ED, Haasch R (2008) Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) from aqueous medium using chitosan-coated biosorbent. Water Res 42:633–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Box GEP, Wilson KG (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of Royal Statistics Society. 13:1–45Google Scholar
  11. Chowdhury MRI, Mulligan CN (2011) Biosorption of arsenic from contaminated water by anaerobic biomass. J Hazard Mater 190:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clancy TM, Hayes KF, Raskin L (2013) Arsenic waste management: a critical review of testing and disposal of arsenic-bearing solid wastes generated during arsenic removal from drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 47:10799–10812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corrêa RA, Calçada LA, Peçanha RP (2007) Development of a fluidized bed system for adsorption of phenol from aqueous solutions with commercial macroporous resins. Braz J Chem Eng 24:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dora TK, Mohanty YK, Roy GK, Sarangi B (2013) Adsorption studies of As(III) from wastewater with a novel adsorbent in a three-phase fluidized bed by using response surface method. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1:50–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregus Z, Roos G, Geerlings P, Nemeti B (2009) Mechanism of thiol supported arsenate reduction mediated by phosphorolyticarsenolytic enzymes II. Enzymatic formation of arsenylated products susceptible for reduction to arsenite by thiols, Toxicol Sci. 110:282–292Google Scholar
  16. Gupta A, Sankararamakrishnan N (2010) Column studies on the evaluation of novel spacer granules for the removal of arsenite and arsenate from contaminated water. Bioresour Technol 101:2173–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haque MN, Morrison GM, Perrusquía G, Gutierréz M, Aguilera AF, Cano-Aguilera I, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2007) Characteristics of arsenic adsorption to sorghum biomass. J Hazard Mater 145:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ihsanullah Abbas A, Al-Amer AM, Laoui T, Almarri M, Nasser M, Khraisheh M, Atieh MA (2016) Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution by advanced carbon nanotubes: critical review of adsorption applications. Sep Purif Technol 157:141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamath HV, Regupathi I, Saidutta MB (2011) Optimization of two step Pongamia biodiesel synthesis under microwave irradiation. Fuel Process Technol 92:100–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khajeh M (2011) Response surface modelling of lead pre-concentration from food samples by miniaturised homogenous liquid–liquid solvent extraction. Box-Behnken design, Food Chem. 129:1832–1838Google Scholar
  21. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Response surfaces: design and analyses, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumari P, Sharma P, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2006) Biosorption studies on shelled Moringaoleifera Lamarck seed powder: removal and recovery of arsenic from aqueous system. Int J Miner Process 78:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manju GN, Raji C, Anirudhan TS (1998) Evaluation of coconut husk carbon for the removal of arsenic from water. Water Res 32:3062–3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ministry of water resources, river development and Ganga rejuvenation, Lok Sabha Secretariat India (2014) Occurrence of high arsenic content in ground water committee on estimates.
  25. Ministry of Water and Sanitation India (2013) Handbook on drinking water treatment technologies.
  26. Mohan D, Pittman Jr CU (2007) Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review. J Hazard Mater 142:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Bricka M, Smith F, Yancey B, Mohammad J, Steele PH, Alexandre-Franco MF, Serrano VG, Gong H (2007) Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio oil production. J Colloid Interface Sci 310:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mondal P, Majumder CB, Mohanty B (2008) Treatment of arsenic contaminated water in a batch reactor by using Ralstoniaeutropha MTCC 2487 and granular activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 153:588–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muktham R, Ball AS, Bhargava SK, Satyavathi B (2016) Study of thermal behavior of deoiled karanja seed cake biomass: thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis kinetics. Energy Science and Engineering 4:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muroyama K, Fan LS (1985) Fundamentals of gas–liquid–solid fluidization. AIChE J 3:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicomel NR, Leus K, Folens K, Van Der Voort P, Du Laing G (2016) Technologies for arsenic removal from water: current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 13:62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nigam S, Vankar PS, Gopal K (2013) Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using dye waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:1161–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandey PK, Choubey S, Verma Y, Pandey M, Chandrashekhar K (2009) Biosorptive removal of arsenic from drinking water. Bioresour Technol 100:634–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patty FA (1963) Industrial hygiene and toxicology, 2nd rev. ed. Vol. II. In: Fassett DW, Irish DD (eds) Toxicology. Interscience, Publishers Inc., New York, pp. 2082–2083Google Scholar
  36. Pokhrel D, Viraraghavan T (2008) Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solution by Iron Oxide-Coated Biomass: common Ion Effects and Thermodynamic Analysis. Sep Sci Technol 43:3545–3562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahman MM, Mukherjee D, Sengupta MK, Chowdhury UK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Roy S, Selim MD, Quamruzzaman Q, Milton AH, Shahidullah SM, Rahman MdT, Chakraborti D (2002) Effectiveness and reliability of arsenic field testing kits: are the million dollar screening projects effective or not? Environ Sci Technol 36:5385–5394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramteke LP, Gogate PR (2016) Treatment of water containing heavy metals using a novel approach of immobilized modified sludge biomass based adsorbents Sep. Purif. Technol. 163:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranjan D, Talat M, Hasan SH (2009a) Rice polish: an alternative to conventional adsorbents for treating arsenic bearing water by up-flow column method. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:10180–10185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ranjan D, Talat M, Hasan SH (2009b) Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue ‘rice polish. J Hazard Mater 166:1050–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roy P, Mondal NK, Bhattacharya S, Das B, Das K (2013) Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) on chemically modified low-cost adsorbent: batch and column operations. Appl. Water. Sci. 3:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roy P, Mondal NK, Das K (2014) Modeling of the adsorptive removal of arsenic: a statistical approach. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2:585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sari A, Ganuluozlu O, Tuzen M (2011) Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic investigations on biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution by algae (Maugeotiagenuflexa) biomass. Chem Eng J 167:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Say R, Yilmaz N, Denizli A (2003) Biosorption of cadmium, lead and arsenic ions by the fungus Penicilliumpurpurogenum. Sep Sci Technol 38:2039–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh R, Chadetrik R, Kumar R, Bishnoi K, Bhatia D, Kumar A, Bishnoi NR, Singh N (2010) Biosorption optimization of lead (II), cadmium (II) and cop-per(II) using response surface methodology and applicability in isotherms and thermodynamics modelling. J Hazard Mater 174:623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smedley PL, Nicolli HB, Macdonald DMJ, Barros AJ, Tullio JO (2002) Hydrogeochemistry of arsenic and other inorganic constituents in groundwaters from La Pampa, Argentina. Appl Geochem 17:259–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soner Altundogan H, Altundogan S, Tumen F, Bildik M (2002) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manage 22:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varala S, Kumar A, Dharanija B, Bhargava SK, Parthasarathy R, Satyavathi B (2016) Removal of thorium (IV) from aqueous solutions by deoiledkaranja seed cake: optimization using Taguchi method, equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 4:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Witek-Krowiak A, Chojnacka K, Podstawczyk D, Dawiec A, Pokomeda K (2014) Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process. Bioresour Technol 160:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yadav LS, Mishra BK, Kumar A, Paul KK (2014) Arsenic removal using bagasse fly ash-iron coated and sponge iron char. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2:1467–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Process Development and Design Group, Chemical EngineeringCSIR - Indian Institute of Chemical TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations