New approaches for efficient removal of some radionuclides and iron from rare earth liquor of monazite processing
- 21 Downloads
In this article, new two approaches (A and B) are created for the efficient removal of the technically enhanced radium isotopes (228Ra, 226Ra and 223Ra), long-lived radioisotope of lead (210Pb), thorium (Th4+) and iron (Fe3+) from the rare earth chloride (RECl3) liquor produced during the monazite processing. In the first approach ‘A,’ elimination of the undesired species is achieved using a synergistic admixture of sulfate–sulfide solution (SO42−/S2− admixture), while the second approach ‘B’ is performed using an iodate solution (IO3−) as a selective precipitating agent. The results indicated that 14% of radionuclides and Th(IV), 12% of Ln(III) and 40% of Fe(III) were removed from the RECl3 liquor at pH 3. In the first approach ‘A,’ the average percentage removal (%R) of all the undesired species reached ~ 96% using sulfate–sulfide admixture (0.058/0.04 mol/L). In the second approach ‘B,’ the average % R of all undesired species is improved and increased to ~ 99% using potassium iodate solution of 0.155 mol/L. Therefore, iodate solution is considered as an efficient and selective agent for the removal of Ra isotopes, 210Pb, Th(IV) and Fe(III) from RECl3 liquor without loss in Ln(III) at the optimized conditions. In this respect, promising results are obtained for the purification and production of Ln(III) using iodate solution or sulfate–sulfide admixture. Finally, the proposed two approaches are considered to be efficient not only to minimize the radiological human risks but also to eliminate the interfering of Th and Fe ions, to produce highly purified lanthanides from monazite ore.
KeywordsMonazite Lanthanides TENORM Treatment
Authors are thankful to the Department of Analytical Chemistry and Control, Hot Laboratories and Waste Management Center for kind cooperation and help in providing necessary laboratory facilities to carry out this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Borai EH, Abd El-Ghany MS, Ahmed IM, Hamed MM, Shahr El-Din AM, Aly HF (2016a) Modified acidic leaching for selective separation of thorium, phosphate and rare earth concentrates from Egyptian crude monazite. Int J Miner Process 149:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borai EH, Shahr El-Din AM, El Afifi EM, Aglan RF, Abo-Aly MM (2016b) Subsequent separation and selective extraction of thorium (IV), iron (III), zirconium (IV) and cerium (III) from aqueous sulfate medium. S Afr J Chem 69:148–156. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2016/v69a18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chenghui MA (2013) Radiation safety regulatory policy and rule for NORM industries in China. In: Proceedings of an international symposium on naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM VII), Beijing, China, 22–26 April, pp 241–252Google Scholar
- IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2006) Assessing the need for radiation protection measures in work involving minerals and raw materials. In: Safety reports series no. 49, pp 1–66Google Scholar
- IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2014) Safety standards for protecting people and the environment. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources. General safety requirements No. GSR Part 3, p 128Google Scholar
- Ishimori Y, Lange K, Martin P, Mayya YS, Phaneuf M (2013) Measurement and calculation of radon releases from NORM residues. Technical reports series no. 474, p 5. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Kolo MT, Binti Abdul Aziz SA, Khandaker MU, Asaduzzaman K, Amin YM (2015) Evaluation of radiological risks due to natural radioactivity around Lynas advanced material plant environment, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(17):13127–13136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4577-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marczenko Z, Balcerzak M (2000) Separation, preconcentration and spectrophotometry in inorganic analysis, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–477Google Scholar
- Olmsted J, Williams G (eds) (2007) Chemistry. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 5th edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Pillai PMB (2007) Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in the extraction and processing of rare earths. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on NORM, Seville, Spain, 19–22 March, IAEA TECDOC, p 197Google Scholar
- Schmidt G (2013) Description and critical environmental evaluation of the REE refining plant LAMP near Kuantan/Malaysia. Radiological and non-radiological environmental consequences of the plant’s operation and its wastes. Report prepared on behalf of NGO “Save Malaysia, Stop Lynas” (SMSL), Kuantan/Malaysia by Öko-Institute. V. D-10179 Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Shoesmith DW (1984) The behavior of radium in soil and in U mine-tailings. White shell Nuclear Research Establishment. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. AECL-7818, pp 1–68Google Scholar
- Speight JG (2005) Lange’s handbook of chemistry, 16th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 331–342Google Scholar
- Strachnov V, Valkovic V, Zeisler R, Dekner R (1991a) Report on the inter comparison run IAEA-314: 226Ra, Th and U in stream sediment. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Strachnov V, Valkovic V, Zeisler R, Dekner R (1991b) Report on the inter comparison run IAEA-312: 226Ra, Th and U in soil. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), ViennaGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2013) Basic information about radionuclides in drinking waterGoogle Scholar