Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The reduction in low-frequency noise of horizontal-axis wind turbines by adjusting blade cone angle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, the effect of blade cone angle on low-frequency noise of horizontal-axis wind turbines is studied to investigate the noise reduction, by adjusting the blade cone angle in different wind speeds. In wind turbines, a significant part of the noise is in infrasound range to which exposure could have adverse effects on human health. In this study, a small turbine is selected as a test case, and the sound field is simulated for different blade cone angles from 0° to 10° with a wind speed range between 5 and 25 m/s. The results of flow simulation show that the change in the output power is < 5% in comparison with the planar turbine. In addition, the calculated results for the low-frequency noise demonstrate that the blade cone angle significantly affects the noise value and the directivity pattern. The investigation of the directivity pattern shows that blade cone angle could have opposite effects on different observer positions, and therefore, the noise calculation at only one position is not enough to conclude about the effect of blade cone angle. The obtained directivity also shows that the turbines with blade cone angles of 2.5° and 5° are preferred in order to reduce the maximum noise, in comparison with the planar turbine. Overall, it is concluded that the adjustment of blade cone angle in different wind speeds can be an effective solution for reducing the low-frequency noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(c_{0}\) :

Speed of sound

\(f\) :

The function defining the location of data surface

\(H\) :

Heaviside function

\(n_{i}\) :

Surface unit normal

\(p^{\prime}\) :

Acoustic pressure fluctuation

\(P_{ij}\) :

Compressive stress tensor

\(T_{ij}\) :

Lighthill stress tensor

\(U_{\infty i}\) :

Inflow velocity

\(v_{i}\) :

Data surface velocity

\(\alpha\) :

Blade cone angle

\(\delta\) :

Dirac delta function

\(\rho_{0}\) :

Undisturbed flow density

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

LFN:

Low-frequency noise

SLN:

Steady loading noise

STN:

Steady thickness noise

References

  • ANSYS C (2013) ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide. ANSYS CFX Release

  • Bakker RH, Pedersen E, van den Berg GP, Stewart RE, Lok W, Bouma J (2012) Impact of wind turbine sound on annoyance, self-reported sleep disturbance and psychological distress. Sci Total Environ 425:42–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra M, Morán J, Jerez A, Cepeda F, Valenzuela M (2017) Wind energy potential in Chile: assessment of a small scale wind farm for residential clients. Energy Convers Manag 140:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolini M, Gamberi M, Graziani A, Manzini R, Pilati F (2014) Performance and viability analysis of small wind turbines in the European Union. Renew Energy 62:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission, I. E (2012) IEC 61400-11 wind turbine generator systems—part 11: acoustic noise measurement techniques. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommes E, Bauknecht H, Scholz G, Rothemund Y, Hensel J, Klingebiel R (2009) Auditory cortex stimulation by low-frequency tones—an fMRI study. Brain Res 1304:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farassat F (2007) Derivation of formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat. NASA TM-2007-214853

  • Fried L, Shukla S, Sawyer S, Teske S (2016) Global wind outlook 2016. Global Wind Energy Council, pp 1–44

  • Ghasemian M, Nejat A (2015) Aerodynamic noise prediction of a horizontal Axis wind turbine using improved delayed detached eddy simulation and acoustic analogy. Energy Convers Manag 99:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbaniasl G, Lacor C (2012) A moving medium formulation for prediction of propeller noise at incidence. J Sound Vib 331:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand M, Simms D, Fingersh L, Jager D, Cotrell J, Schreck S, Larwood S (2001) Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-500-29955

  • Hensel J, Scholz G, Hurttig U, Mrowinski D, Janssen T (2007) Impact of infrasound on the human cochlea. Hear Res 233:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinalizadeh R, Rafiei ES, Alavijeh AS, Ghaderi SF (2017) Economic analysis of small wind turbines in residential energy sector in Iran. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 20:58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki T, Li Y, Nishi Y (2015) Analysis of aerodynamic sound noise generated by a large-scaled wind turbine and its physiological evaluation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1933–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen J (2012) Danish regulation of low frequency noise from wind turbines. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 31:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress C, Chokani N, Abhari R (2015) Downwind wind turbine yaw stability and performance. Renew Energy 83:1157–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Paik K-J, Xing T, Carrica PM (2012) Dynamic overset CFD simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics. Renew Energy 37:285–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ (1952) On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 211:564–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ (1954) On sound generated aerodynamically. II. Turbulence as a source of sound. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 222:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen R, Sørensen JN, Shen WZ (2001) Modelling and analysis of the flow field around a coned rotor. Wind Energy 4:121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo J-O, Lee Y-H (2011) Numerical simulation for prediction of aerodynamic noise characteristics on a HAWT of NREL phase VI. J Mech Sci Technol 25:1341–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafaeipour A (2013) Economic evaluation of small wind turbine utilization in Kerman, Iran. Energy Convers Manag 73:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukulo B, Ngaruiya J, Kamau J (2014) Determination of wind energy potential in the Mwingi-Kitui plateau of Kenya. Renew Energy 63:18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum MA, Aramini JJ, Hanning CD (2012) Effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep and health. Noise Health 14:237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobari M, Mirzaee E, Nosratollahi M (2016) Improvement of wind turbine performance using a novel tip plate structure. Energy Convers Manag 123:592–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt AN, Hullar TE (2010) Responses of the ear to low frequency sounds, infrasound and wind turbines. Hear Res 268:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH, Klokker M (2014) Health effects related to wind turbine noise exposure: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9:e114183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd D, McBride D, Welch D, Dirks KN, Hill EM (2011) Evaluating the impact of wind turbine noise on health-related quality of life. Noise Health 13:333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Q, Lubitz WD (2014) Design and testing of a new small wind turbine blade. J Sol Energy Eng 136:034502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thumthae C, Chitsomboon T (2009) Optimal angle of attack for untwisted blade wind turbine. Renew Energy 34:1279–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummala A, Velamati RK, Sinha DK, Indraja V, Krishna VH (2016) A review on small scale wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:1351–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Renterghem T, Bockstael A, de Weirt V, Botteldooren D (2013) Annoyance, detection and recognition of wind turbine noise. Sci Total Environ 456–457:333–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner S, Bareiss R, Guidati G (2012) Wind turbine noise. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Waye KP, Öhrström E (2002) Psycho-acoustic characters of relevance for annoyance of wind turbine noise. J Sound Vib 250:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JF, Hawkings DL (1969) Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 264:321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelmule MM, Vsj EA (2013) CFD predictions of NREL phase VI rotor experiments in NASA/AMES wind tunnel. Int J Renew Energy Res 3:261–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the University of Tehran and Iran Industrial Pump (IIP) Company. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bozorgi.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Mohamed Fathy Yassin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bozorgi, A., Ghorbaniasl, G. & Nourbakhsh, S.A. The reduction in low-frequency noise of horizontal-axis wind turbines by adjusting blade cone angle. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 2573–2586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1639-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1639-x

Keywords

Navigation