Biological leachate treatment using anaerobic/aerobic process: suspended growth-activated sludge versus aerobic granular sludge
- 281 Downloads
Landfill leachate treatment was investigated using two anaerobic/aerobic sequencing batch reactors inoculated with suspended growth-activated sludge (ASBR) and aerobic granular sludge (GSBR). The total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) concentration in the GSBR influent was as high as 1200 mg/L with an average TAN removal efficiency of 99.7%. However, the ASBR treatment did not show a consistent performance in TAN removal. The TAN removal efficiency decreased with increasing ammonium concentration in the influent. Aerobic granular sludge was found to be more resistant to free ammonia (FA). In the GSBR, nitrification was partially inhibited at FA concentration from 48 to 57 mg/L, which was two times more than the FA concentration that inhibited nitrification in the ASBR. Low chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies were obtained in both reactors, which was associated with the refractory organic content of the leachate used in this study. This resulted in poor phosphorous removal in both treatments. The results prove that aerobic granular sludge is a robust method as compared to suspended-activated sludge to treat leachate containing high levels of TAN and FA.
KeywordsAerobic granular sludge Floccular-activated sludge Landfill leachate treatment Ammonium removal Free ammonia inhibition
This research is financially supported by National Science and Engineering Research Council (Grant No. RGPIN-2014-05510). The authors would like to thank CNPq-Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Grant No. 203208/2014-5) for a postdoctoral scholarship.
- Abbas AA, Jingsong G, Ping LZ, Ya PY, Al-Rekabi WS (2009) Review on landfill leachate treatments. J Appl Sci Res 5(5):534–545Google Scholar
- Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TB, Srinath EG (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48:835–852Google Scholar
- APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Aziz HA, Zahari MSM, Adlan MN, Hung YT (2012) Physicochemical treatment processes of landfill leachate. In: Hung YT, Wang LK, Shammas NK (eds) Handbook of environment and waste management: air and water pollution control. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, pp 819–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Kreuk MK, De Bruin LMM, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2005) Aerobic granular sludge: from idea to pilot plant. In: Bathe S, De Kreuk M, McSwain B, Schwarzenbeck N (eds) Aerobic granular sludge. IWA Publishing, London, pp 111–124Google Scholar
- Ford DL, Churchwell RL, Kachtick JW (1980) Comprehensive analysis of nitrification of chemical processing wastewaters. J Water Pollut Control Fed 52(11):2726–2746Google Scholar
- Water and Waste Department–Environmental Standards Division (2016) Brady Road Resource Management Facility Annual Report-2016. http://www.winnipeg.ca/waterandwaste/pdfs/garbage/reports/BRRMF/2016_annual_report.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2017