Advertisement

Determining biokinetic coefficients for the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating sugarcane wastewater in hot climate conditions

  • S. Mousavian
  • M. Seyedsalehi
  • O. Paladino
  • P. Sharifi
  • G. Z. Kyzas
  • D. Dionisi
  • A. TakdastanEmail author
Original Paper
  • 199 Downloads

Abstract

Sugar extraction from sugarcane is a process which contains high volume of effluent, high levels of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and organic matter. Thus, their discharge into the rivers and environmental systems endangers the aquatic life. This study investigates and determines the kinetic coefficients of anaerobic treatment system (upflow anaerobic sludge blanket) in sugarcane industrial wastewater treatment plant. COD, BOD5 and TSS parameters in the input and output effluent of reactor were measured, and the kinetic coefficients of Kd, KS, Kmax and µmax were calculated using modified Monod equations by determining the design and operating parameters of the system. The experimental results showed that rate of KS, Y, Kd, µmax and Kmax for the application of UASB process in wastewater treatment of sugarcane factories was 506.4 mg/L, 0.053 g VSS/g COD, 0.086, 0.0049 and 0.055 day−1, respectively. The kinetic coefficients obtained in this research can be used in management, operation and preparation of design principles of similar sugarcane treatment plants particularly in topical areas.

Keywords

Wastewater treatment Sugarcane industry, kinetic coefficients UASB reactor Modified Monod equation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The managing director of Imam Khomeini (pbuh) Agro-Industry in Shushtar and the laboratory expert of Agro-Industry Treatment Plant are highly appreciated for their cooperation in conducting this study.

References

  1. Anderson GK, Kasapgil B, Ince O (1996) Microbial kinetics of a membrane anaerobic reactor system. Environ Technol 17:449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association Publication, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Borjai R, Banks CJ (1994) Kinetics of an upflow an aerobic sludge blanket reactor treating ice-cream waste water. Environ Sci Health 29:2063–2085Google Scholar
  4. Brito AG, Melo LF (1997) A simplified analysis of reaction and mass transfer in UASB and EGSB reactors. Environ Technol (U K) 18:35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331808616510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos CMM, Saléh BB, Carmo FR (2005) Determination of kinetic parameters of a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) removing organic loading from swine manure effluents. Revista Agrociência 29:1045–1051Google Scholar
  6. Fazelipour M, Takdastan A, Jou MSS (2011) Survey on chlorine application in sequencing batch reactor waste sludge in order to sludge minimization. Asian J Chem 23:2994–2998Google Scholar
  7. Işik M, Sponza DT (2005) Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Process Biochem 40:1189–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iza J, Colleran E, Paris JM, Wu WM (1991) International workshop on anaerobic treatment technology for municipal and industrial wastewaters: summary paper. Water Sci Technol 24:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaafari J et al (2017) Simultaneous biological organic matter and nutrient removal in an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2O) moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) integrated system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Masse L, Massé DI (2010) The effect of environmental and process parameters on flocculation treatment of high dry matter swine manure with polymers. Bioresour Technol 101:6304–6308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mirzaiy A, Takdastan A, Alavi N, Mohamadian H (2012) Removal of turbidity organic matter, coliform and heterotrophic bacteria by coagulants poly aluminium chloride from Karoon River water in Iran. Asian J Chem 24:2389–2393Google Scholar
  12. Mosavian S, Takdastan A (2014) Determination of kinetic coefficients in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket using industrial wastewater. J Water Waste Water 2:62–70Google Scholar
  13. Mostaed S, Amin MM, Hassani A, Takdastan A (2010) Anaerobic biofilm reactor system efficiency in sugar cane industry wastewater treatment. J Health Syst Res 6:1002–1014Google Scholar
  14. Mousavian S, Takdastan A, Seyedsalehi M, Akhavani S (2016) Determining the kinetic’s coefficients in treatment of sugarcane industry using aerobic activated sludge by complete-mix regime. J Chem Pharm Res 8:1342–1349Google Scholar
  15. Nejad MH, Takdastan A, Jaafarzadeh N, Mogadam MA, Mengelizadeh N (2013) Removal of orthophosphate from municipal wastewater using chemical precipitation process in Ahvaz wastewater treatment plant. Iran Asian J Chem 25:2565–2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Osaloo A, Khoushfetrat A (2004) Process of biological removal of volatile organic compounds in wastewater treatment plant aeration basin petrochemical. In: 9th national conference on engineering chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, IranGoogle Scholar
  17. Pazoki M, Takdastan A, Jaafarzadeh N (2010) Investigation of minimization of excess sludge production in sequencing batch reactor by heating some sludge. Asian J Chem 22:1751–1759Google Scholar
  18. Pérez J, Aldana G, Cárdenas C (2012) Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) performance through sludge age load and kinetic coefficients. Rev Tech IngUnv Zulia 35:98–108Google Scholar
  19. Rodríguez-Gómez R (2013) A model to predict the behavior of UASB reactors. Int J Environ Res 7:605–614Google Scholar
  20. Seghezzo L (2004) Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in subtropical regions. Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  21. Seyedsalehi M et al (2017) Evaluation of moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) in operating A2O process with emphasis on biological removal of nutrients existing in wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-13017-11360-13769 (in press) Google Scholar
  22. Takdastan A, Mehrdadi N, Torabian A, Azimi AA, Bidhendi GN (2009) Investigation of excess biological sludge reduction in sequencing bach reactor. Asian J Chem 21:2419–2427Google Scholar
  23. Takdastan A, Azimi AA, Jaafarzadeh N (2010) Biological excess sludge reduction in municipal wastewater treatment by chlorine. Asian J Chem 22:1665–1674Google Scholar
  24. Tauzene M, Milton C (2011) Determination of kinetic parameters of an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanked reactor (UASB) treating swine waste water. Ciênc Agrotec Lavras 35:1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Haandel A, Kato MT, Calvacanti PFF, Florencio L (2006) Anaerobic reactor design concepts for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 5:21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mousavian
    • 1
  • M. Seyedsalehi
    • 2
  • O. Paladino
    • 3
  • P. Sharifi
    • 4
  • G. Z. Kyzas
    • 5
  • D. Dionisi
    • 6
  • A. Takdastan
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Applied Sciences and TechnologyEducation Center of MunicipalityAhvazIran
  2. 2.School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental EngineeringUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran
  5. 5.Hephaestus Advanced LaboratoryEastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of TechnologyKavalaGreece
  6. 6.Materials and Chemical Engineering Group, School of EngineeringUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  7. 7.Department of Environmental Health EngineeringAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations