Advertisement

Eco-friendly smart hydrogels for soil conditioning and sustain release fertilizer

  • J. Pushpamalar
  • S. J. Langford
  • M. B. Ahmad
  • Y. Y. Lim
  • K. Hashim
Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

In the agricultural industry, biomass waste generated along with the production of food, is transformed into value-added products. Also, the demand for the slow or control release fertilizer is increasing to reduce the cost of maintaining the agricultural land. These issues are tackled by converting biomass waste to a slow fertilizer release vehicle and biodegradable water retention material that could reduce the cost for fertilizer application and simultaneously preserved the soil from dryness. A series of carboxymethyl sago pulp (CMSP) hydrogels were prepared by electron beam irradiation. Slow release systems were evaluated by loading potassium nitrate (KNO3) and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) into the CMSP hydrogels. These CMSP hydrogels endow slow release property, biodegradability and a soil moisture preservation property that could find greener application in agricultural industries. The results indicate that CMSP hydrogels have a great potential as an agent for slow release of fertilizers.

Keywords

Carboxymethyl sago pulp Hydrogel Soil preservation Soil biodegradation Slow release fertilizer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the School of Chemistry at Monash University, Clayton, Australia, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Amsden B (1998) Solute diffusion in hydrogels.: an examination of the retardation effect. Polym Gels Netw 6:13–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajpai A, Giri A (2002) Swelling dynamics of a macromolecular hydrophilic network and evaluation of its potential for controlled release of agrochemicals. React Funct Polym 53:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bajpai A, Giri A (2003) Water sorption behaviour of highly swelling (carboxy methylcellulose-g-polyacrylamide) hydrogels and release of potassium nitrate as agrochemical. Carbohydr Polym 53:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlos A, da Silva DB, Shepherd Andrew W, Jenane Chakib, Miranda-da-Cruz Sergio (2009) Agro-industries for development. CAB International and Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick D, Wei J, Yan’an T, Guanghui Y, Qirong S, Qing C (2015) Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable agricultural intensification in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa-Júnior ES, Barbosa-Stancioli EF, Mansur AA, Vasconcelos WL, Mansur HS (2009) Preparation and characterization of chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) chemically crosslinked blends for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 76:472–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demitri C, Scalera F, Madaghiele M, Sannino A, Maffezzoli A (2013) Potential of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels as water reservoir in agriculture. Int J Polym Sci 2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/435073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Mohdy HA (2007) Water sorption behavior of CMC/PAM hydrogels prepared by γ-irradiation and release of potassium nitrate as agrochemical. React Funct Polym 67:1094–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francis S, Kumar M, Varshney L (2004) Radiation synthesis of superabsorbent poly (acrylic acid)–carrageenan hydrogels. Radiat Phys Chem 69:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Global Fertilizers and Agricultural Chemicals (2011) DatamonitorGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta S, Kumar M, Kumar J, Ahmad V, Pandey R, Chauhan N (2017) Systemic analysis of soil microbiome deciphers anthropogenic influence on soil ecology and ecosystem functioning. Int J Environ Sci Technol pp 1–10Google Scholar
  12. Handbook IIHSCE (2015) Controlled and Slow Release Fertilizers. Colorado, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang J, Richard H, Zheng S (2014) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil labile carbon fractions of freshwater marsh soil in Northeast China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:2009–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Islami N, Taib S, Yusoff I, Ghani AA (2011) Time lapse chemical fertilizer monitoring in agriculture sandy soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8:765–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim D-G, Hernandez-Ramirez G, Giltrap D (2013) Linear and nonlinear dependency of direct nitrous oxide emissions on fertilizer nitrogen input: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klinger D, Landfester K (2012) Stimuli-responsive microgels for the loading and release of functional compounds: fundamental concepts and applications. Polymer 53:5209–5231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, He J-Z, Hughes JM, Liu Y-R, Zheng Y-M (2014) Effects of super-absorbent polymers on a soil–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in the field. Appl Soil Ecol 73:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu G (2013) Brief introduction of slow/controlled release fertilizer industry of China and related standards. In: Third international conference on slow and controlled release and stabilized fertilizers, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA)Google Scholar
  19. Mahdy A, Elkhatib E, Balba A, Ahmed G (2017) Speciation and fractionation of phosphorus in biosolids-amended soils: effects of water treatment residual nanoparticles. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14(8):1729–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcì G, Mele G, Palmisano L, Pulito P, Sannino A (2006) Environmentally sustainable production of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. Green Chem 8:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagasawa N, Yagi T, Kume T, Yoshii F (2004) Radiation crosslinking of carboxymethyl starch. Carbohydr Polym 58:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nie H, Liu M, Zhan F, Guo M (2004) Factors on the preparation of carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel and its degradation behavior in soil. Carbohydr Polym 58:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nomura H, Koda S, Hattori F (1990) Viscosity of aqueous solutions of polysaccharides and their carboxylate derivatives. J Appl Polym Sci 41:2959–2969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pincus L, Margenot A, Six J, Scow K (2016) On-farm trial assessing combined organic and mineral fertilizer amendments on vegetable yields in central Uganda. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pourjavadi A, Sadat Afjeh S, Seidi F, Salimi H (2011) Preparation of acrylated agarose-based hydrogels and investigation of their application as fertilizing systems. J Appl Polym Sci 122:2424–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pushpamalar V (2010) Preparation and characterisation of carboxymethyl cellulose and carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel from sago waste. Monash University Australia, ClaytonGoogle Scholar
  27. Pushpamalar V, Langford SJ, Ahmad M, Lim YY (2006) Optimization of reaction conditions for preparing carboxymethyl cellulose from sago waste. Carbohydr Polym 64:312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pushpamalar V, Langford SJ, Ahmad M, Hashim K, Lim YY (2013a) Absorption characterization of Ca2+, Na+, and K+ on irradiation crosslinked carboxymethyl sago pulp hydrogel. J Appl Polym Sci 128:1828–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pushpamalar V, Langford SJ, Ahmad M, Hashim K, Lim YY (2013b) Preparation of carboxymethyl sago pulp hydrogel from sago waste by electron beam irradiation and swelling behavior in water and various pH media. J Appl Polym Sci 128:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quirós R, Villalba G, Gabarrell X, Muñoz P (2015) Life cycle assessment of organic and mineral fertilizers in a crop sequence of cauliflower and tomato. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3299–3316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahman ZA (2004) Fertilizer use by crop in Malaysia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  32. Saraydin D, Karadağ E, Güven O (1995) Adsorptions of some heavy metal ions in aqueous solutions by acrylamide/maleic acid hydrogels. Sep Sci Technol 30:3287–3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saraydin D, Karadağ E, Güven O (1996) Behaviors of acrylamide/maleic acid hydrogels in uptake of some cationic dyes from aqueous solutions. Sep Sci Technol 31:2359–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaviv A, Mikkelsen R (1993) Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation-a review. Fertil Res 35:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith L, Siciliano G (2015) A comprehensive review of constraints to improved management of fertilizers in China and mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith EA, Prues SL, Oehme FW (1997) Environmental degradation of polyacrylamides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snyder C, Bruulsema T, Jensen T, Fixen P (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun G, Chu C-C (2006) Synthesis, characterization of biodegradable dextran–allyl isocyanate–ethylamine/polyethylene glycol–diacrylate hydrogels and their in vitro release of albumin. Carbohydr Polym 65:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Weerden T et al (2016) Nitrous oxide emissions from urea fertiliser and effluent with and without inhibitors applied to pasture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219:58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T (2001) Hydrogel of biodegradable cellulose derivatives. II. Effect of some factors on radiation-induced crosslinking of CMC. J Appl Polym Sci 81:3030–3037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Wang Z, Zhu B (2007) Preparation and properties of new non-loading and superhigh ammonium nitrate loading hydrogels. React Funct Polym 67:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wei W, Yan Y, Cao J, Christie P, Zhang F, Fan M (2016) Effects of combined application of organic amendments and fertilizers on crop yield and soil organic matter: an integrated analysis of long-term experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeinali M, Lenjannezhadian H (2017) Degradation of urea by entrapped cross-linked urease aggregates: a combinatorial approach to urease stabilization for environmental and industrial applications. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s13762-017-1337-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao L, Mitomo H (2009) Hydrogels of dihydroxypropyl chitosan crosslinked with irradiation at paste-like condition. Carbohydr Polym 76:314–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zia KM, Bhatti IA, Barikani M, Zuber M, Bhatti HN (2009) XRD studies of polyurethane elastomers based on chitin/1, 4-butane diol blends. Carbohydr Polym 76:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ScienceMonash University MalaysiaSubang JayaMalaysia
  2. 2.School of ChemistryMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  4. 4.Malaysian Nuclear AgencyBangi, KajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations