Advertisement

Xenobiotic and essential metals biomonitoring by feathers: molting pattern and feather regrowth sequence in four dominant waterfowl

  • M. Sadeghi
  • S. M. GhasempouriEmail author
  • N. Bahramifar
Original Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The variations of some metals including nickel, iron, copper, zink, mercury, lead, and cadmium were examined in wing primaries of dominant wintering waterfowl in international wetlands near the Caspian Sea’s southern basin, including graylag goose (Anser anser), mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), pintail (Anas acuta) and common teal (Anas crecca). The core question of this study is the determination of primary feathers arrangement in molting, growth pattern effects and its performance on the bioaccumulation of contamination and determining the best growth feather location for biomonitoring purposes. The metals content, overall trend lines, and correlations among the 10 primary wing feathers were compared, and molting effects and feather regrowth were investigated. The metals were measured by AMA 254 Advanced Mercury Analyzer and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. In all the species, almost all primaries have simultaneous regrowth, but their growth continues irregularly. There were significant differences in metal differences with juvenile waterfowl that did not experience molting compared to adults that do. The results showed that all of the species (except common teal) have experienced molting due to the difference of Hg concentration between adults and juveniles. It seems unplanned or random selection of bird’s feathers to achieve pollutants monitoring purposes by previous studies’ methods can now be challenged. In order to examine the linear changes of some elements (mercury, copper, and zink), it is recommended to collect samples of middle primaries, while samples of the feather growth locations to study the linear changes of nickel, iron, lead, and cadmium are necessary.

Keywords

Bioaccumulation Fereydoonkenar Trace elements Migration Wetland Wing primary 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Zahedan University for their assistance with metal measurements. We would also like to thank Dr. Reza Dahmardeh, the lecturer of Zabol University, and Manzar Haghdoost, the laboratory expert of Tarbiat Modares University for their assistance and cooperation. This study was supported by the fund of the Tarbiat Modares University (Tehran, Iran) (Grant No. 152D/3351). All of the experiments have been covered by the financial support of the Tarbiat Modares University.

Supplementary material

13762_2017_1557_MOESM1_ESM.xls (240 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 239 kb)

References

  1. Abbasi NA, Jaspers VLB, Chaudhry MJI, Ali S, Malik RN (2015) Influence of taxa, trophic level, and location on bioaccumulation of toxic metals in bird’s feathers: a preliminary biomonitoring study using multiple bird species from Pakistan. Chemosphere 120:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdullah M, Fasola M, Muhammad A, Malik SA, Bostan N, Bokhari H, Kamran MA, Shafqat MN, Alamdar A, Khan M, Ali N, Eqani SAMAS (2015) Avian feathers as a non-destructive bio-monitoring tool of trace metals signatures: a case study from severely contaminated areas. Chemosphere 119:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadpour M, Hoseini SH, Ahmadpour M, Mashrofeh A, Sinkakarimi MH, Ghasempouri SM, Pourkhabbaz AR, Eskandari T (2013) Assessment of mercury concentration in feathers of six species of waterbirds in Southern Caspian Sea Wetlands. www.wesca.net, 8
  4. Burger J (2013) Temporal trends (1989–2011) in levels of mercury and other heavy metals in feathers of fledgling great egrets nesting in Barnegat Bay, NJ. Environ Res 122:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1991) Lead, mercury, and cadmium in feathers of tropical terns in Puerto Rico and Australia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burger J, Seyboldt S, Morganstein N, Clark K (1993) Heavy metals and selenium in feathers of three shorebird species from Delaware Bay. Environ Monit Assess 28:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daryaei N, Mirdamadi M, Hosseini JF, Rahimi Soureh S, Arjomandi R (2014) Development of Economic, social and environmental sustainability indicators of fereydoonkenar international Wetland Site (Ramsar Site) by using Delphi Method. MAGNT Res Rep 2:504–524Google Scholar
  8. Dauwe T, Lieven B, Ellen J, Rianne P, Ronny B, Marcel E (2002) Great and blue tit feathers as biomonitors for heavy metal pollution. Ecol Indic 1:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dauwe T, Bervoets L, Pinxten R, Blust R, Eens M (2003) Variation of heavy metals within and among feathers of birds of prey: effects of molt and external contamination. Environ Pollut 124:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furness RW, Monaghan P (1987) Seabird feeding ecology. Seabird ecology. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hahn E, Hahn K, Stoeppler M (1993) Bird feathers as bioindicators in areas of the German Environmental Specimen Bank–bioaccumulation of mercury in food chains and exogenous deposition of atmospheric pollution with lead and cadmium. Sci Total Environ 139–140:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mansouri B, Majnoni F (2014) Comparison of the metal concentrations in organs of two bird species from Western of Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 92:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mansouri B, Pourkhabbaz A, Babaei H, Hoshyari E (2012) Heavy metal contamination in feathers of Western Reef Heron (Egrettagularis) and Siberian gull (Larusheuglini) from Hara biosphere reserve of Southern Iran. Environ Monit Assess 184:6139–6145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martínez A, Crespo D, Fernández JÁ, Aboal JR, Carballeira A (2012) Selection of flight feathers from Buteobuteo and Accipiter gentilis for use in biomonitoring heavy metal contamination. Sci Total Environ 425:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morel FM, Kraepiel AM, Amyot M (1998) The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:543–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nighat S, Iqbal S, Nadeem MS, Mahmood T, Shah SI (2013) Estimation of heavy metal residues from the feathers of Falconidae, Accipitridae, and Strigidae in Punjab, Pakistan. Turk J Zool 37:488–500Google Scholar
  17. Norouzi M, Mansouri B, Hamidian AH, Ebrahimi T, Kardoni F (2012) Comparison of the metal concentrations in the feathers of three bird species from Southern Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:1082–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ochoa-Acuña H, Sepúlveda MS, Gross TS (2002) Mercury in feathers from Chilean birds: influence of location, feeding strategy, and taxonomic affiliation. Mar Pollut Bull 44:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pon JPS, Beltrame O, Marcovecchio J, Favero M, Gandini P (2012) Assessment of trace metal concentrations in feathers of White-chinned Petrels, Procellariaaequinoctialis, from the Patagonian shelf. Environ Pollut 1:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rajaei F, Esmaili Sari A, Bahramifar N, Ghasempouri SM (2010) Mercury concentration in 3 species of gulls, larusridibundus, larusminutus, laruscanus, from south coast of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:716–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rothschild RFN, Duffy LK (2005) Mercury concentrations in muscle, brain and bone of Western Alaskan waterfowl. Sci Total Environ 349:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seco Pon JPS, Beltrame O, Marcovecchio J, Favero M, Gandini P (2011) Trace metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in feathers of Black-browed Albatross Thalassarchemelanophrys attending the Patagonian Shelf. Mar Environ Res 72:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson DR, Bearhop S, Speakman JR, Furness RW (1998) Feathers as a means of monitoring mercury in seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis. Environ Pollut 101:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ullah K, Hashmi MZ, Malik RN (2014) Heavy-metal levels in feathers of cattle egret and their surrounding environment: a case of the Punjab Province, Pakistan. Arch Environ ContamToxicol 66:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Warner SE, Shriver WG, Olsen BJ, Greenberg RG, Taylor RJ (2012) Mercury in wing and tail feathers of hatch-year and adult tidal marsh sparrows. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 63:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Savabieasfahani M (2009a) Mercury in wetland birds of Iran and Iraq: contrasting resident Moorhen, Gallinulachloropus, and migratory common teal, Anascrecca, life strategies. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82:450–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Savabieasfahani M (2009b) Mercury levels in selected tissues of three kingfisher species; Cerylerudis, Alcedoatthis, and Halcyon smyrnensi, from Shadegan Marshes of Iran. Ecotoxicology 18:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R, Esmaili-Sari A, Savabieasfahani M, Bahramifar N (2010) Cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis) and little egret (Egrettagarzetta) as monitors of mercury contamination in Shadegan Wetlands of south-western Iran. Environ Monit Assess 166:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zolfaghari G, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Kiabi BH (2007) Examination of mercury concentration in the feathers of 18 species of birds in southwest Iran. Environ Res 104:258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine ScienceTarbiat Modares UniversityNoorIran

Personalised recommendations