Advertisement

Wastewater treatment: a case study of electronics manufacturing industry

  • R. Abdel Wahaab
  • F. A. Alseroury
Original Paper
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Industrial wastewater from electronics industries contains a high load of cyanide, toxic metals and chemical oxygen demand (COD). In the present study, a chemical treatment of electronics industry effluent was carried out for one of the largest electronics factories in Egypt. Alkaline chlorination and chemical reduction were performed sequentially as pretreatment steps with the aim of removing cyanide and Cr+6 from the effluent of the nickel–chrome production line. Thereafter, pretreated water was mixed with the end pipe effluent containing wastewater of all production lines and evaluated for final treatment using coagulation process. Different coagulants (CaO, FeSO4, polyelectrolyte) were applied with different compositions and concentrations. The water quality parameters such as COD, biological oxygen demand (BOD), cyanide, heavy metals and pH were estimated in an attempt to achieve a higher treatment efficiency. The results showed that the alkaline chlorination removed 100% of cyanide at pH 11 during 2 h of reaction time. Sequentially, a complete reduction of hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) to non-toxic trivalent chromium (Cr+3) was achieved at pH 2 during pretreatment of nickel–chrome wastewater. Among various coagulants, the combination of CaO (80 mg/L) with FeSO4 (60 mg/L) represented highest treatment efficiency of wastewater within the permissible limits. BOD and COD were decreased to as low as 43 and 67 mg/L, whereas heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn) were found below 0.02 mg/L. Overall, the results revealed that this method could be adopted to establish an economical and efficient wastewater treatment system for effluents of electronics industries.

Keywords

Industrial wastewater Electronics industry Coagulation Alkaline chlorination Chemical treatment Metals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported and performed at National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.

Abbreviations

COD

Chemical oxygen demand

BOD

Biological oxygen demand

TSS

Total suspended solids

TDS

Total dissolved solids

TM

Total heavy metal concentration

RWW

Raw wastewater

TWW

Treated wastewater

MiWW

Mixed wastewater (nickle–chrome production line + end pipe)

References

  1. Abdel Wahaab R (2000) Up-grading of industrial wastewater treatment units at automobile industry. Int J Biomed Environ Sci 30:219–241Google Scholar
  2. Abdel Wahaab R, Moawad AK, Taleb EA, Ibrahim HS, El-Nazer HAH (2010) Combined photocatalytic oxidation and chemical coagulation for cyanide and heavy metals removal from electroplating wastewater. World Appl Sci J 8:462–469Google Scholar
  3. Anjum M, Oves M, Kumar R, Barakat MA (2017) Fabrication of ZnO–ZnS@ polyaniline nanohybrid for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol and microbial contaminants in wastewater. Int Biodeter Biodegr 19:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chipasa KB (2003) Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system. Waste Manag 23:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai L, Cui L, Zhou D, Huang J, Yuan S (2015) Resource recovery of Cr(VI) from electroplating wastewater: laboratory and pilot-scale investigation using fibrous weak anion exchanger. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 54:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dermentzis K, Christoforidis A, Valsamidou E, Lazaridou A, Kokkinos N (2011) Removal of hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewater by electrocoagulation with iron electrodes. Glob Nest J 13:412–418Google Scholar
  7. Gao Y, Zhou Y, Wang H, Lin W, Wang Y, Sun D, Hong J, Li Q (2013) Simultaneous silver recovery and cyanide removal from electroplating wastewater by pulse current electrolysis using static cylinder electrodes. Indu Eng Chem Res 52:5871–5879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu Y, Wu Y, Xu M, Mu X, Zuo T (2016) Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling for a sustainable resource supply in the electronics industry in China. J Clean Prod 127:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo YF, Wu W, Huang WC, Zhang H, Liu YJ, Xu LZ, Huang TY (2012) Application of anoxic-aerobic biological process for treatment of compositive electroplating wastewater. In: Iranpour Reza, Zhao Ji, Wang Aijie, Yang Fenglin, Li Xinyong (eds) Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications, Zürich, pp 2361–2365Google Scholar
  10. Gupta VK, Rastogi A, Nayak A (2010) Adsorption studies on the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution using a low cost fertilizer industry waste material. J Colloid Interface Sci 342:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackbarth FV, Maass D, de Souza AAU, Vilar VJ, de Souza SMGU (2016) Removal of hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewaters using marine macroalga Pelvetia canaliculata as natural electron donor. Chem Eng J 290:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu C, You L, Liu H, Qu J (2015) Effective treatment of cadmium–cyanide complex by a reagent with combined function of oxidation and coagulation. Chem Eng J 26:296–300Google Scholar
  13. Hudaya T, Marsha A, Paramita E, Andrean D (2013) Effects of pH and photocatalyst concentration on hexavalent chromium removal from electroplating waste water by UV/TIO2 photocatalysis. J Appl Sci 13:639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim YM, Lee DS, Park C, Park D, Park JM (2011) Effects of free cyanide on microbial communities and biological carbon and nitrogen removal performance in the industrial activated sludge process. Water Res 45:1267–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kobya M, Demirbas E, Ozyonar F, Sirtbas G, Gengec E (2017) Treatments of alkaline non-cyanide, alkaline cyanide and acidic zinc electroplating wastewaters by electrocoagulation. Process Saf Environ Prot 105:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li T, Wang H, Dong W, Liu T, Ouyang F, Zhang Q (2014) Phosphate removal during Fe(II) oxidation in the presence of Cu(II): characteristics and application for electro-plating wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 132:388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu W, Ratnaweera H (2017) Feed-forward-based software sensor for outlet turbidity of coagulation process considering plug flow condition. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1689–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu YX, Yuan DX, Yan JM, Li QL, Ouyang T (2011) Electrochemical removal of chromium from aqueous solutions using electrodes of stainless steel nets coated with single wall carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 186:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu T, Yang X, Wang ZL, Yan X (2013) Enhanced chitosan beads-supported Fe 0-nanoparticles for removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater in permeable reactive barriers. Water Res 47:6691–6700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu H, Wang Y, Wang J (2015) Recovery of Ni+2 and pure water from electroplating rinse wastewater by an integrated two-stage electrodeionization process. J Clean Prod 92:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martín-Lara MA, Blázquez G, Trujillo MC, Perez A, Calero M (2014) New treatment of real electroplating wastewater containing heavy metal ions by adsorption onto olive stone. J Clean Prod 81:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monser L, Adhoum N (2002) Modified activated carbon for the removal of copper, zinc, chromium and cyanide from wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 26:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orescanin V, Kollar R, Mikelic IL, Nad K (2013) Electroplating wastewater treatment by the combined electrochemical and ozonation methods. J Environ Sci Health A 48:1450–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prakash N, Garg A (2016) Comparative performance evaluation of physicochemical treatment processes for simulated dairy wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2675–2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pulkka S, Martikainen M, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2014) Electrochemical methods for the removal of anionic contaminants from water—a review. Sep Purif Technol 132:252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quijano G, Arcila JS, Buitron G (2017) Microalgal-bacterial aggregates: applications and perspectives for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.07.003 Google Scholar
  27. Shak KPY, Wu TY (2015) Optimized use of alum together with unmodified Cassia obtusifolia seed gum as a coagulant aid in treatment of palm oil mill effluent under natural pH of wastewater. Ind Crop Prod 76:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sochacki A, Surmacz-Gorska J, Guy B, Faure O (2014) Microcosm fill-and-drain constructed wetlands for the polishing of synthetic electroplating wastewater. Chem Eng J 251:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teh CY, Wu TY (2014) The potential use of natural coagulants and flocculants in the treatment of urban waters. Chem Eng Trans 39:1603–1608Google Scholar
  30. Teh CY, Budiman PM, Shak KPY, Wu TY (2016) Recent advancement of coagulation–flocculation and its application in wastewater treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:4363–4389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. USAIP (1999) Revision of law 48 of 1982 for the protection of the Nile River and its waterways from pollution. APRP-Water Policy Activity Contract PCE-I-00-96-00002-00 Task Order 807Google Scholar
  32. Vasudevan S, Lakshmi J, Vanathi R (2010) Electrochemical coagulation for chromium removal: process optimization, kinetics, isotherms and sludge characterization. CLEAN Soil Air Water 38:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang L, Xiong XF, Fan Z, Zhang GL, Wang ZY (2013) Advanced treatment of electroplating wastewater by nanofiltration membrane technology. Appl Mech Mater 378:318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang SY, Tang YK, Li K, Mo YY, Li HF, Gu ZQ (2014) Combined performance of biochar sorption and magnetic separation processes for treatment of chromium-contained electroplating wastewater. Bioresour Technol 174:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu H, Li A, Feng L, Cheng X, Ding S (2012) Destruction of cyanide in aqueous solution by electrochemical oxidation method. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:7516–7525Google Scholar
  36. Xu Y, Zhang J, Liang Y, Zhou J, Zhao J, Ruan X, Xu ZP, Qian G (2015) Synchronous cyanide purification with metals removal in the co-treatment of Zn–CN and Ni electroplating wastewaters via the Ni2+-assisted precipitation of LDH. Sep Purif Technol 145:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang J, Liu L, Liang Y, Zhou J, Xu Y, Ruan X, Lu Y, Xu Z, Qian G (2015) Enhanced precipitation of cyanide from electroplating wastewater via self-assembly of bimetal cyanide complex. Sep Purif Technol 150:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao X, Wang H, Chen F, Mao R, Liu H, Qu J (2013) Efficient treatment of an electroplating wastewater containing heavy metal ions, cyanide, and organics by H2O2 oxidation followed by the anodic Fenton process. Water Sci Technol 68:1329–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental SciencesNational Research CenterCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of SciencesKing Abdulaziz University & University of JeddahJeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations