Advertisement

Clinical analysis of repeat microvascular decompression for recurrent hemifacial spasm

  • Wei Shu
  • Hongwei ZhuEmail author
  • Yongjie Li
  • Ruicun Liu
Original article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of repeat microvascular decompression (MVD) for recurrent hemifacial spasm (HFS). The clinical features, surgical findings, outcomes, and complications of 13 patients who underwent MVD with a history of prior MVD in Xuanwu Hospital between January 2010 and May 2017 were analysed retrospectively. All patients were successfully treated for their HFS but experienced recurrent symptoms and received repeat MVD. Teflon felt factors (9/13, 69.2%) and vascular changes (4/13, 30.8%) were the main reasons for recurrent HFS. With a mean follow-up of 34.6 months after surgery (ranging from 12 to 92 months), 11 (84.6%) patients achieved complete or major spasm alleviation and two patients (15.4%) achieved fair outcomes. Surgical complications included transited mild to moderate facial weakness in two patients (15.4%). None of the patients had serious surgical morbidities. Repeat MVD is an effective and safe treatment for recurrent HFS.

Keywords

Hemifacial spasm Failed microvascular decompression Recurrent Re-operation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Auger RG, Whisnant JP (1990) Hemifacial spasm in rochester and olmsted county, minnesota, 1960 to 1984. Arch Neurol-Chicago 47:1233–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nilsen B, Le KD, Dietrichs E (2004) Prevalence of hemifacial spasm in Oslo, Norway. Neurology 63:1532–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jannetta PJ, Abbasy M, Maroon JC, Ramos FM, Albin MS (1977) Etiology and definitive microsurgical treatment of hemifacial spasm. Operative techniques and results in 47 patients. J Neurosurg 47:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jo KW, Kong DS, Park K (2013) Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: long-term outcome and prognostic factors, with emphasis on delayed cure. Neurosurg Rev 36:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang DB, Wang ZM (2017) Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm associated with the vertebral artery. Acta Neurol Belg 117:713–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hyun SJ, Kong DS, Park K (2010) Microvascular decompression for treating hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a prospective study of 1,174 operations. Neurosurg Rev 33:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sindou M, Mercier P (2018) Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: outcome on spasm and complications. A review. Neurochirurgie 64:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electrophysiological observations. Neurosurgery 16:612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park YS, Chang JH, Cho J, Park YG, Chung SS, Chang JW (2006) Reoperation for persistent or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 58:1162–1167; (discussion 1162–1167) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kureshi SA, Wilkins RH (1998) Posterior fossa reexploration for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm: surgical findings and therapeutic implications. Neurosurgery 43:1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li CS (2005) Varied patterns of postoperative course of disappearance of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir 147:617–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dai YX, Ni HB, Xu W, Lu TY, Liang WB (2016) Clinical analysis of hemifacial spasm patients with delay symptom relief after microvascular decompression of distinct offending vessels. Acta Neurol Belg 116:53–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campos-Benitez M, Kaufmann AM (2008) Neurovascular compression findings in hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 109:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ammar A, Lagenaur C, Jannetta P (1990) Neural tissue compatibility of Teflon as an implant material for microvascular decompression. Neurosurg Rev 13:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dou NN, Zhong J, Liu MX, Xia L, Sun H, Li B, Li ST (2016) Teflon might be a factor accounting for a failed microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a technical note. Stereot Funct Neuros 94:154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masuoka J, Matsushima T, Kawashima M, Nakahara Y, Funaki T, Mineta T (2011) Stitched sling retraction technique for microvascular decompression: procedures and techniques based on an anatomical viewpoint. Neurosurg Rev 34:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ichikawa T, Agari T, Kurozumi K, Maruo T, Satoh T, Date I (2011) “Double-Stick Tape” technique for transposition of an offending vessel in microvascular decompression: technical case report. Neurosurgery 68:377–382Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raabe A, Jaiimsin A, Seifert V, Beck J (2011) Use of a strip-clip technique to maintain transposition of a vertebral artery in microvascular decompression surgery. Acta Neurochir 153:2393–2395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang JW, Chang JH, Choi JY, Kim DI, Park YG, Chung SS (2002) Role of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after microvascular decompression of the facial nerve for the treatment of hemifacial spasm. Neurosurgery 50:720–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El Refaee E, Langner S, Baldauf J, Matthes M, Kirsch M, Schroeder HWS (2013) Value of 3-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the offending vessel in hemifacial spasm: comparison with intraoperative high definition endoscopic visualization. Neurosurgery 73:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ocal R, Tunc T, Ayas ZO, Yilmaz O, Inan LE (2016) Comparison of brain MRI angiography and brain MRI cisternography in patients with hemifacial spasm. Acta Neurol Belg 116:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iijima K, Horiguchi K, Yoshimoto Y (2013) Microvascular decompression of the root emerging zone for hemifacial spasm: evaluation by fusion magnetic resonance imaging and technical considerations. Acta Neurochir 155:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kong DS, Park K, Shin BG, Lee JA, Eum DO (2007) Prognostic value of the lateral spread response for intraoperative electromyography monitoring of the facial musculature during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 106:384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sekula RF Jr, Frederickson BS A M. et al (2009) Utility of intraoperative electromyography in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 27:E10Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    El Damaty A, Rosenstengel C, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Schroeder HWS (2016) The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients. Neurosurg Rev 39:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fukuda M, Oishi M, Takao T, Hiraishi T, Sato Y, Fujii Y (2012) Monitoring of abnormal muscle response and facial motor evoked potential during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Surg Neurol Int 3:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kalkanis SN, Eskandar EN, Carter BS, Barker FG (2003) Microvascular decompression surgery in the United States, 1996 to 2000: mortality rates, morbidity rates, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volumes. Neurosurgery 52:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Belgian Neurological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Institute of Function neurosurgery, Xuanwu HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations