Advertisement

Document recommendation based on interests of co-authors for brain science

  • Han ZhongEmail author
  • Zhisheng Huang
Research
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Personalized knowledge recommendation is an effective measure to provide individual information services in the field of brain science. It is essential that a complete understanding of authors’ interests and accurate recommendation are carried out to achieve this goal. In this paper, a collaborative recommendation method based on co-authorship is proposed to make. In our approach, analysis of collaborators’ interests and the calculation of collaborative value are used for recommendations. Finally, the experiments using real documents associated with brain science are given and provide supports for collaborative document recommendation in the field of brain science.

Keywords

User and co-author Interests Recommendation Semantic technology Brain science 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the the JKF program of People’s Public Security University of China (2019JKF334), and the National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFC0801003).

References

  1. 1.
    Lane RD, Ryan L. Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: new insights from brain science. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryan PB, Bridge D. Collaborative recommending using formal concept analysis. Knowl Based Syst. 2006;19(5):309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarwa BS, Karypis G, Konstan J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM; 2001. pp. 285–295.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma H, Zhou D, Liu C et al. Recommender systems with social regularization. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Hong Kong, China; 2011. pp. 287–296.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2005;17(6):734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci Am. 2001;284(5):34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fensel D, van Harmelen F. Unifying reasoning and search to web scale. IEEE Internet Comput. 2007;11(2):94–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dan B, Guha RV, Brian M. RDF Vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema, W3C Recommendation; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hao C, Yubo J, Chengwei H. Research of collaborative filtering recommendation based on user trust model. Comput Eng Appl. 2010;46(35):148–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo L, Ma J, Chen Z, Jiang H. Incorporating item relations for social recommendation. Chin J Comput. 2014;37(1):219–28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen J, Zhang H, He X, Nie L, Liu W, Chua T-S. Attentive collaborative filtering: multimedia recommendation with item- and component-level attention. In: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York: ACM; 2017. pp. 335–344.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang S, Qian X, Shen J, Yun Fu, Mei T. Author topic model-based collaborative filtering for personalized POI recommendations. IEEE Trans Multimed. 2015;17(6):907–18.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Efthymiou K, Sipsas K, Mourtzis D. On knowledge reuse for manufacturing systems design and planning: a semantic technology approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2014;8:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeng Y, Zhong N, Wang Y, Qin YL, Huang ZS, Zhou HY. User-centric query refinement and processing using granularity based strategies. Knowl Inf Syst. 2010;27(3):419–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeng Y, Zhou EZ, Qin YL, Zhong N. Research interests: their dynamics, structures and applications in web search refinement. In: Proceeding of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society; 2010. pp. 639–646.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang J, Tao X, Wang H. Outlier detection from large distributed databases. World Wide Web. 2014;17(4):539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li H, Wang Y, Wang H, Zhou B. Multi-window based ensemble learning for classification of imbalanced streaming data. World Wide Web. 2017;20(6):1507–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khalil F, Wang H, Li J. Integrating markov model with clustering for predicting web page accesses. In: Proceeding of the 13th Australasian world wide web conference (AusWeb07); 2007. pp. 63–74.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khalil F, Li J, Wang H. An integrated model for next page access prediction. Int J Knowl Web Intell. 2009;1(1):48–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ma J, Sun L, Wang H, Zhang Y, Aickelin U. Supervised anomaly detection in uncertain pseudoperiodic data streams. ACM Trans Internet Technol. 2016;16(1):4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peng M, Zeng G, Sun Z, Huang J, Wang H, Tian G. Personalized app recommendation based on app permissions. World Wide Web. 2018;21(1):89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Technology and Network SecurityPeople’s Public Security University of ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.Knowledge Representation and Reasoning GroupVrije University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations