Life Sciences for Philosophers and Philosophy for Life Scientists: What Should We Teach?
Following recent debate on the relations between philosophy of science and the sciences, we wish to draw attention to some actual ways of training both young philosophers of science and young life scientists and clinicians. First, we recall a successful case of training philosophers of the life sciences in a strictly scientific environment. Second, after a brief review of the reasons why life scientists and clinicians are currently asking for more ethics, more methodology of science, and more philosophy of science in the training of life scientists and clinicians, we present two training models that could spur the discussion on how to meet the requests coming from the scientific community. We argue that in order to reflect on mutual relations between philosophy of science and the sciences and to foster proper interactions, issues regarding (1) the topics considered, (2) the features of educational curricula, and (3) the institutional organizations should be addressed jointly.
KeywordsNeed for the philosophy of science Philosophical curricula Philosophy of science for life scientists and clinicians Science for philosophers of science Scientific curricula
We would like to thank Thomas Pradeu for his useful comments on a previous version of the paper and three anonymous reviewers whose suggestions have helped to improve this article.
- Altenberg L (2015) Statistical problems in a paper on variation in cancer risk among tissues, and new discoveries. arXiv:1501.04605
- Casadevall A (2015) Put the “Ph” back in PhD. Johns Hopkins Public Health, Summer 2015. http://magazine.jhsph.edu/2015/summer/forum/rethinking-put-the-ph-back-in-phd/
- Ferretti G, Linkeviciute A, Boniolo G (2017) Comprehending and communicating statistics in breast cancer screening. Ethical implications and potential solutions. In: Gadebusch-Bondio M, Spöring F, Gordon J-S (eds) Medical ethics, prediction and prognosis: interdipliplinary perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Losee J (1972) A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Maugeri P, Blasimme A (2011) Humanised models of cancer in molecular medicine: the experimental control of disanalogies. Hist Philos Life Sci 33:603–622Google Scholar
- Oldroyd R (1986) The arch of knowledge: an introductory study of the history of the philosophy and methodology of science. Routledge Kegan & Paul, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
- Smith R (2016) Medicine’s need for philosophy. In: the BMJ opinion. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/04/08/richard-smith-medicines-need-for-philosophy/. Accessed 8 Apr 2016
- Snow CP (1961) The two cultures and the scientific revolution: the Rede Lecture 1959. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar