Advertisement

Social-Ecological Theory of Maximization: Basic Concepts and Two Initial Models

  • Ulysses Paulino AlbuquerqueEmail author
  • Patricia Muniz de Medeiros
  • Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior
  • Taline Cristina da Silva
  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
  • Thiago Gonçalves-Souza
Original Article

Abstract

Efforts have been dedicated to the understanding of social-ecological systems, an important focus in ethnobiological studies. In particular, ethnobiological investigations have found evidence and tested hypotheses over the last 30 years on the interactions between human groups and their environments, generating the need to formulate a theory for such systems. In this article, we propose the social-ecological theory of maximization to explain the construction and functioning of these systems over time, encompassing hypotheses and evidence from previous ethnobiological studies. In proposing the theory, we present definitions and two conceptual models, an environmental maximization model and a redundancy generation model. The first model seeks to address biota selection and its use by human populations. The second emphasizes how the system organizes itself from the elements that were incorporated into it. Furthermore, we provide the theoretical scenario of plant selection and use from an evolutionary perspective, which explicitly integrates the phylogenetic relationships of plants (or other living resources) and human beings.

Keywords

Evolutionary ethnobiology Human ecology Optimization theories Social-ecological systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the research productivity grant awarded to UPA and PMM and the contribution of the INCT Ethnobiology, Bioprospecting and Nature Conservation, certified by CNPq, with financial support from FACEPE (Foundation for Support to Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco—Grant number: APQ-0562-2.01/17).

References

  1. Albuquerque UP (2006) Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brail. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:30Google Scholar
  2. Albuquerque UP, Oliveira RF (2007) Is the use-impact on native Caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? J Ethnopharmacol 113:156–170Google Scholar
  3. Albuquerque UP, Ferreira Júnior WS (2017) What do we study in evolutionary ethnobiology? Defining the theoretical basis for a research program. Evol Biol 44:207–215Google Scholar
  4. Albuquerque UP, Silva VA, Cabral MC, Alencar NL, Andrade LHC (2008) Comparisons between the use of medicinal plants in indigenous and rural caatinga (dryland) communities in NE Brazil. Bol Latinoam y del Caribe de Plantas Med y Aromát 7:156–170Google Scholar
  5. Alencar NL, Araújo TAS, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP (2010) The inclusion and selection of medicinal plants in traditional pharmacopoeias? Evidence in support of the diversification hypothesis. Econ Bot 64:68–79Google Scholar
  6. Alves ASA, Nascimento ALB, Albuquerque U, Castro CC (2017) Optimal foraging theory perspectives on the strategies of itinerant beekeepers in semiarid Northeast Brazil. Hum Ecol 45:1–11Google Scholar
  7. Ankli A, Sticher O, Heinrich M (1999) Yucatec Maya medicinal plants versus nonmedicinal plants: indigenous characterization and selection. Hum Ecol 27:557–580Google Scholar
  8. Atran S, Medin DI (2008) The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Atran S, Medin DI, Ross N (2002) Thinking about biology. Modular constraints on categorization and reasoning in the everyday life of Americans, Maya, and scientists. Mind Soc 6:31–63Google Scholar
  10. Atran S, Medin DI, Ross N (2004) Evolution and devolution of knowledge: a tale of two biologies. J Royal Anthropol Inst 10:395–420Google Scholar
  11. Barrett B (1995) Herbal knowledge on Nicaragua’s Atlantic coast: consensus within diversity. J Commun Healthcare 20:403–421Google Scholar
  12. Bennett BC, Prance GT (2000) Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeia of northern South America. Econ Bot 54:90–102Google Scholar
  13. Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Blonder B (2017) Hypervolume concepts in niche and trait-based ecology. Ecography 40:001–013Google Scholar
  15. Blonder B, Morrow CB, Maitner B, Harris DJ, Lamanna C et al (2017) New approaches for delineating n-dimensional hypervolumes. Methods Ecol Evol 9:305–319Google Scholar
  16. Blüthgen N, Klein A (2011) Functional complementarity and specialization: the role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic Appl Ecol 12:282–291Google Scholar
  17. Carmona CP, Bello F, Mason NWH, Leps J (2016) Traits without borders: integrating functional diversity across scales. Trends Ecol Evol 31:382–394Google Scholar
  18. Claidière N, Scott-Phillips TC, Sperber D (2014) How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philos Trans Royal Soc B 369:20130368Google Scholar
  19. Coe FG, Anderson GJ (1999) Ethnobotany of the Sumu (Ulwa) of Southeastern Nicaragua and comparisons with Miskitu plant lore. Econ Bot 53:363–386Google Scholar
  20. Delgado-Serrano MM, Oteros-Rozas E, Ruiz-Mallén I, Calvo-Boyero D, Ortiz-Guerrero CE et al (2017) Influence of community-based natural resource management strategies in the resilience of social-ecological systems. Reg Environ Change 18:581–592Google Scholar
  21. Díaz-Reviriego I, Fernández-Llamazares A, Salpeteur M, Howard PL, Reyes-García V (2016) Gendered medicinal plant knowledge contributions to adaptive capacity and health sovereignty in Amazonia. Ambio 45:263–275Google Scholar
  22. Faulkner L, Brown K, Quinn T (2018) Analyzing community resilience as an emergent property of dynamic social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 23:24Google Scholar
  23. Fehr E, Fischblacher U (2004) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):185–190Google Scholar
  24. Feitosa IS, Monteiro JM, Araújo EL, Lopes P, Albuquerque UP (2018) Optimal foraging theory and medicinal bark extraction in Northeastern Brazil. Human Ecol 46:917–922Google Scholar
  25. Folke C (2006) Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253–267Google Scholar
  26. Ferreira Júnior WS, Ladio AH, Albuquerque UP (2011) Resilience and adaptation in the use of medicinal plants with suspected anti-inflammatory activity in the Brazilian Northeast. J Ethnopharmacol 138:238–252Google Scholar
  27. Ferreira Júnior WS, Santoro FR, Nascimento ALB, Ladio AH, Albuquerque UP (2013) The role of individuals in the resilience of local medical systems based on the use of medicinal plants—a hypothesis. Ethnobiol Conserv 2:1Google Scholar
  28. Ferreira Júnior WS, Medeiros, PM, Albuquerque UP (2019) Evolutionary ethnobiology. In eLS. John Wiley, Chichester.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0028232
  29. Gama ADS, Paula M, Silva RRV, Ferreira Júnior WS, Medeiros PM (2018) Exotic species as models to understand biocultural adaptation: challenges to mainstream views of human-nature relations. PLoS One 13:e0196091Google Scholar
  30. Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, Mcmillen H (2017) Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Econ Bot 71(3):269–287Google Scholar
  31. Gonçalves PHS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM (2016) The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: a meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 26(7):2238–2253Google Scholar
  32. Gottlieb M, Borin M, Bossio B (1995) Chemosystematics clues for the choice of medicinal and food plants in Amazônia. Biotrópica 27:401–406Google Scholar
  33. Hart G, Gaoue OG, de la Torre L, Navarrete H, Muriel P et al (2017) Availability, diversification and versatility explain human selection of introduced plants in Ecuadorian traditional medicine. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184369Google Scholar
  34. Hector AB, Schmid C, Beierkuhnlein MC, Caldeira M, Diemer PG et al (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286(5442):1123–1127Google Scholar
  35. Heinrich M (2003) Ethnobotany and natural products: the search for new molecules, new treatments of old diseases or a better understanding of indigenous cultures? Curr Topics Med Chem 3:141–154Google Scholar
  36. Inta A, Shengji P, Baslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Trisonthi CA (2008) comparative study on medicinal plants used in Akha’s traditional medicine in China and Thailand, cultural coherence or ecological divergence? J Ethnopharmacol 116:508–517Google Scholar
  37. Jorge LR, Prado PI, Almeida-Neto M, Lewinsohn TM (2014) An integrated framework to improve the concept of resource specialisation. Ecol Lett 17:1341–1350Google Scholar
  38. Kelly ELA, Eynaud Y, Clements SM, Gleason M, Sparks RT et al (2016) Investigating functional redundancy versus complementarity in Hawaiian herbivorous coral reef fishes. Oecologia 182:1151–1163Google Scholar
  39. Kendal RL, Boogert NJ, Rendell L, Laland KN, Webster M, Jones PL (2018) Social learning strategies: bridge-building between fields. Trends Cogn Sci 22:651–665Google Scholar
  40. Ladio A, Lozada M (2003) Comparison of wild edible plant diversity and foraging strategies in two aboriginal communities of northwestern Patagonia. Biodivers Conserv 12:937–951Google Scholar
  41. Ladio A, Lozada M, Weigandt M (2007) Comparison of traditional wild plant knowledge between aboriginal communities inhabiting arid and forest environments in Patagonia, Argentina. J Arid Environ 69:695–715Google Scholar
  42. Levine JKMA, Chan T, Satterfield (2015) From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: Exorcising the ghost of Homo economicus with a unified synthesis of cognition research. Ecol Econ 114:22–32Google Scholar
  43. Lopes PFM, Clauzet M, Hanazaki N, Ramires M, Silvano RAM, Begossi A (2011) Foraging behaviour of Brazilian riverine and coastal fishers: how much is explained by the optimal foraging theory? Conserv Soc 9(3):236–246Google Scholar
  44. Loreau M (2004) Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104:606–611Google Scholar
  45. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609Google Scholar
  46. Medeiros PM, Albuquerque UP (2015) Use patterns of medicinal plants by local populations. In: Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Casas A (eds) Evolutionary ethnobiology. Springer, Cham, pp 163–174Google Scholar
  47. Medeiros PM, Soldati GT, Alencar NL, Vandebroek I, Pieroni A et al (2012) The use of medicinal plants by migrant people: adaptation, maintenance, and replacement. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2012:807452Google Scholar
  48. Medeiros PM, Santos Pinto BL, Nascimento VT (2015) Can organoleptic properties explain the differential use of medicinal plants? Evidence from Northeastern Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 159:43–48Google Scholar
  49. Medeiros PM, Ferreira Júnior WS, Ramos MA, Silva TC, Ladio AH, Albuquerque UP (2017) Why do people use exotic plants in their local medical systems? A systematic review based on Brazilian local communities. PLoS One 12:e0185358Google Scholar
  50. Mesoudi A (2015) Cultural evolution: a review of theory, findings and controversies. Evol Biol 43:481–497Google Scholar
  51. Moerman DE (1979) Symbols and selectivity: a statistical analysis of native American medical ethnobotany. J Ethnopharmacol 1:111–119Google Scholar
  52. Moerman DE (1991) The medicinal flora of native North America: an analysis. J Ethnopharmacol 31:1–42Google Scholar
  53. Monteiro JM, Albuquerque UP, Lins-Neto EMF, Araújo EL, Amorim ELC (2006) Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. J Ethnopharmacol 105:173–186Google Scholar
  54. Nairne JS, Thompson SR, Pandeirada JNS (2007) Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention. J Exp Psychol 33:263–273Google Scholar
  55. Nascimento VT, Vasconcelos MAS, Maciel MIS, Albuquerque UP (2012) Famine foods of Brazil seasonal dry forests: ethnobotanical and nutritional aspects. Econ Bot 66:22–34Google Scholar
  56. Nascimento ALB, Ferreira Júnior WS, Ramos MA, Medeiros PM, Soldati GT et al (2015) Utilitarian redundancy: conceptualization and potential applications in ethnobiological research. In: Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Casas A (eds)  Evolutionary ethnobiology. Springer, Cham, pp 121–130Google Scholar
  57. Nascimento ALB, Lozano A, Melo JG, Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP (2016) Functional aspects of the use of plants and animals in local medical systems and their implications for resilience. J Ethnopharmacol 194:348–357Google Scholar
  58. Oliveira LEC, Begossi A (2011) Last trip return rate influence patch choice decisions of small-scale shrimp trawlers: optimal foraging in São Francisco, Coastal Brazil. Hum Ecol 39:323–332Google Scholar
  59. Orlove B (2005) Human adaptation to climate change: a review of three historical cases and some general perspectives. Environ Sci Policy 8:589–600Google Scholar
  60. Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993a) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ Bot 47(1):15–32Google Scholar
  61. Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993b) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot 47(1):33–43Google Scholar
  62. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and test. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154Google Scholar
  63. Rendell L, Fogarty L, Hoppit WJE, Morgan TJH, Webster MM, Laland KN (2011) Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends Cogn Sci 15:68–76Google Scholar
  64. Reyes-García V, Vadez V, Huanca T, Leonard W, Wilkie D (2005) Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: a comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobot Res Appl 3:201–207Google Scholar
  65. Reyes-García V, Guèze M, Luz AC, Paneque-Gálvez J, Macía MJ et al (2013) Evidence of traditional knowledge loss among a contemporary indigenous society. Evol Hum Behav 34:249–257Google Scholar
  66. Rode C, Cosmides L, Hell W, Tooby J (1999) When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory? Cognition 72:269–304Google Scholar
  67. Santoro FR, Ferreira Júnior WS, Araújo TAS, Ladio AH, Albuquerque UP (2015) Does plant species richness guarantee the resilience of local medical systems? A perspective from utilitarian redundancy. PLoS One 10:e0119826Google Scholar
  68. Santoro FR, Santos GC, Ferreira Júnior WS, Chaves LDS, Araújo TAS et al (2017) Testing an ethnobiological evolutionary hypothesis on plant-based remedies to treat malaria in Africa. Evol Biol 44:216–226Google Scholar
  69. Santoro FR, Nascimento ALB, Soldati GT, Ferreira Júnior WS, Albuquerque UP (2018) Evolutionary ethnobiology and cultural evolution: opportunities for research and dialog. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 14:1Google Scholar
  70. Santos CS, Barros FN, Paula M, Rando J, Nascimento VT, Medeiros PM (2018) What matters when prioritizing a medicinal plant? A study of local criteria for their differential use. Acta Bot Bras.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0336 Google Scholar
  71. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Savolainen V, Williamson EM, Forest F, Wagstaff SJ et al (2012) Phylogenies reveal predictive power of traditional medicine in bioprospecting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(39): 15835Google Scholar
  72. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Hawkins JA, Greenhill SL, Pendry CA, Watson MF et al (2014) The evolution of traditional knowledge: environment shapes medicinal plant use in Nepal. Proc Royal Soc B 281:20132768Google Scholar
  73. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Rønsted N, Clarke AC, Hawkins JA (2015) Evolutionary approaches to ethnobiology. In: Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Casas A (eds) Evolutionary ethnobiology. Springer, Cham, pp 59–72Google Scholar
  74. Scheffer M, van Nes EH (2006) Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(16):6230–6235Google Scholar
  75. Silva APT, Medeiros PM, Ferreira Júnior WS, Silva RRV (2018) Does forest scarcity affect the collection and use of firewood by rural communities? A case study in the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil. Econ Bot 72:71Google Scholar
  76. Tanaka MM, Kendal JR, Laland KN (2009) From traditional medicine to witchcraft: why medical treatments are not always efficacious. PLoS ONE 4(4):e5192Google Scholar
  77. Toneu IT, Jordan FM, Hawkins JA (2018) Comparative phylogenetic methods and the cultural evolution of medicinal plant use. Nat Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0226-6 Google Scholar
  78. Vandebroek I, Calewaert JB, De Jonckheere S, Sanca S, Semo L et al (2004) Use of medicinal plants and pharmaceuticals by indigenous communities in the Bolivian Andes and Amazon. Bull World Health Org 82:243–250Google Scholar
  79. Winterhalder B, Smith EA (2000) Analyzing adaptive strategies: human behavioral ecology at twenty-five. Evol Anthropol 9:51–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patricia Muniz de Medeiros
    • 2
  • Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior
    • 3
  • Taline Cristina da Silva
    • 4
  • Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva
    • 2
  • Thiago Gonçalves-Souza
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos (LEA), Departamento de Botânica, Centro de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de Ecologia, Conservação e Evolução Biocultural, Centro de Ciências AgráriasUniversidade Federal de AlagoasRio LargoBrazil
  3. 3.Campus PetrolinaUniversidade de PernambucoPetrolinaBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual de AlagoasAlagoasBrazil
  5. 5.Laboratório de Ecologia Filogenética e Funcional, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Dois IrmãosRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations