Advertisement

Neotropical Entomology

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 538–551 | Cite as

Identification and Expression Profiling of Odorant Receptor Protein Genes in Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) Using RT-qPCR

  • Q TangEmail author
  • Y Zhang
  • C Shen
  • D Xia
Ecology, Behavior and Bionomics
  • 133 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to identify ORs (odorant receptors) and Orco (odorant receptor coreceptor) genes in Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea), to explore the relative expression levels of these genes in different adult tissues and obtain information on highly expressed receptor proteins. Putative OR and Orco genes were identified from transcriptomic data previously obtained for S. zeamais using bioinformatics methods. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to compare the differences in expression in seven adult tissues (male antennae, female antennae, heads, thoraxes, abdomens, wings, and legs). The candidate OR and Orco gene sequences were analyzed, and the protein physicochemical properties were predicted. We identified 64 OR genes including the Orco gene. Forty-seven OR genes, including Orco, were over expressed in male or female antennae. Seventeen OR genes appeared to be expressed at elevated levels in male antennae. Twenty-nine genes were expressed at significantly elevated levels in female antennae. In total, 11 OR genes were selected for further sequence analysis. The selected proteins were structurally characterized, and bioinformatics analysis was performed. Overall, in this study, candidate ORs of S. zeamais have been identified for the first time, and these ORs could be molecular targets for interference in the insect olfactory system.

Keywords

Sitophilus zeamais odorant receptors expression profiling identification 

Notes

Author Contribution Statement

QFT and YZ conceived and designed the experimental work and analysis; QFT, YZ, and DSX executed experimental work; QFT, YZ, and CS conducted the bioinformatics analysis and performed experimental data analyses; QFT, YZ, and CS wrote the manuscript; QFT and YZ checked the English text and revised the manuscript.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31500313); Key Project for University Excellent Young Talents by Anhui Province, China (Grant No. gxyqZD2016035), Key Project for Academic and Technical Leader Candidate of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. 2017H107); Innovation Program of Anhui Agricultural University, China (Grant No. 2018yjs-6); and Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. KJ2014A075).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

13744_2019_671_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25(17):3389–3402.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson I, Brass A (1998) Searching DNA databases for similarities to DNA sequences: when is a match significant? Bioinformatics 14(4):349–356.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bairoch A, Boeckmann B (1991) The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):49–54.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.suppl.2247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer S, Zhang H, Lempérière G (2012) A review of control methods and resistance mechanisms in stored-product insects. Bull Entomol Res 102(2):213–229.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485311000654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterwick JA, del Mármol J, Kim KH, Kahlson MA, Rogow JA, Walz T, Ruta V (2018) Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Orco. Nature 560:447–452.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0420-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey AF, Carlson JR (2011) Insect olfaction from model systems to disease control. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108(32):12987–12995.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103472108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey AF, Wang G, Su CY, Zwiebel LJ, Carlson JR (2010) Odorant reception in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Nature 464(7285):66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clyne PJ, Warr CG, Freeman MR, Lessing D, Kim J, Carlson JR (1999) A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron 22(2):327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81093-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faruki SI, Miyanoshita A, Takahashi K, Misumi T, Imamura T, Naito H, Goto M, Soma Y (2005) Susceptibility of various developmental stages of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Col., Curculionidae) to methyl iodide in brown rice. J Appl Entomol 129(1):12–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2005.00917.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaillard I, Rouquier S, Giorgi D (2004) Olfactory receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 61(4):456–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3273-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao Q, Chess A (1999) Identification of candidate Drosophila olfactory receptors from genomic DNA sequence. Genomics 60(1):31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1999.5894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones WD, Nguyen TA, Kloss B, Lee KJ, Vosshall LB (2005) Functional conservation of an insect odorant receptor gene across 250 million years of evolution. Curr Biol 15(4):119–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamanula JF, Belmain SR, Hall DR, Farman DI, Goyder DJ, Mvumi BM, Masumbu FF, Stevenson PC (2017) Chemical variation and insecticidal activity of Lippia javanica (Burm. f.) Spreng essential oil against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. Ind Crop Prod 110:75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanehisa M, Aki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 36 (Database issue): 480–484.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm882
  15. Krieger J, Klink O, Mohl C, Raming K, Breer H (2003) A candidate olfactory receptor subtype highly conserved across different insect orders. J Comp Physiol A 189(7):519–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0427-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larsson MC, Domingos AI, Jones WD, Chiappe ME, Amrein H, Vosshall LB (2004) Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43(5):703–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li K, Wei H, Shu C, Shuai Z, Cao Y, Chen L, Jiao Y (2017) Identification and comparison of candidate odorant receptor genes in the olfactory and non-olfactory organs of Holotrichia oblita Faldermann by transcriptome analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics 24:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2017.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu S, Wang WL, Zhang YX, Zhang BX, Rao XJ, Liu XM, Wang DM, Li SG (2017) Transcriptome sequencing reveals abundant olfactory genes in the antennae of the rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Entomol Sci 20(1):177–188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods Enzymol 25(4):402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchlerbauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI (2015) CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43(Database issue):D222–D226.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchlerbauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He L, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR (2017) CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D200–D203.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, Mccue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5(7):621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.1226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pelosi P, Zhou JJ, Ban LP, Calvello M (2006) Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication. Cell Mollife Sci 63(14):1658–1676.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5607-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Heijne GV, Nielsen H (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8(10):785–786.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sato K, Touhara K (2008) Insect olfaction: receptors, signal transduction, and Behavior. Results Probl Cell Differ 47:121–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/400_2008_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sotiriades E, Dollas A (2007) A general reconfigurable architecture for the BLAST algorithm. J Signal Process Sys or Signal Image and Video Technology 48(3):189–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-007-0069-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sousa AH, Faroni LRD, Pimentel MAG, Silva GN, Guedes RNC (2016) Ozone toxicity to Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations under selection pressure from ozone. J Stored Prod Res 65(1–5).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2015.11.001
  28. Su CY, Menuz K, Carlson JR (2009) Olfactory perception: receptors, cells, and circuits. Cell 139(1):45–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang QY, Zhang CX (2013) Data Processing System (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci 20(2):254–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01519.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):33–36.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang YL, Chen Q, Zhao HB, Ren BZ (2016) Identification and comparison of candidate olfactory genes in the olfactory and nonolfactory organs of elm pest Ambrostoma quadriimpressum (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) based on transcriptome analysis. PLoS One 11(1):e0147144.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang YL, Chen Q, Guo JQ, Li J, Wang JT, Wen M, Zhao HB, Ren BZ (2017) Molecular basis of peripheral olfactory sensing during oviposition in the behavior of the parasitic wasp Anastatus japonicus. Insect biochem molec 89:58–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiao JH, Wang N, Lu B, Xu YY, Murphy RW, Huang DW (2009) Expression and evolutionary divergence of the non-conventional olfactory receptor in four species of fig wasp associated with one species of fig. BMC Evolutionary Biology,9,1(2009-02-20), 9(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-43
  34. Yang S, Cao D, Wang G, Yang L (2017) Identification of genes involved in chemoreception in Plutella xyllostella by antennal transcriptome analysis. Sci Rep 7(1):11941.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11646-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao H, Gao P, Zhang C, Ma W, Jiang Y (2013) Molecular identification and expressive characterization of an olfactory co-receptor gene in the Asian honeybee, Apis cerana cerana. J Insect Sci 13(80):80.  https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.8001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept of EntomologyAnhui Agricultural UnivHefeiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations