Bioassay Method for Toxicity Studies of Toxic Bait Formulations to Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)
- 55 Downloads
The development of appropriate methodologies for bioassays is of paramount importance to study the methodological factors that may interfere in the experimental design. Thus, laboratory bioassays have become increasingly important for the determination of data that are realistic and replicable. The objective of the study was to develop a bioassay methodology with the ready-to-use toxic bait Success™ 0.02CB, 96 mg L−1 of spinosad, in adults of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) as a study model. The insect origin (laboratory population, LT50 = 11.16 h), time of toxic bait supply (4 h, LT50 = 16.85 h), food deprivation (12 h, LT50 = 15.55 h), and the adult age (5 days, LT50 = 35.31 h) of C. capitata showed higher susceptibility and a shorter LT50 lethal time to the Success™ 0.02CB toxic bait. However, the absence or presence of a food source (LT50 ≈ 31.17 h) during the bioassay did not affect the susceptibility of C. capitata. Further, adults of C. capitata who were deprived and in the absence of a food source (artificial diet) had higher consumption of toxic baits (mg) during treatment exposure. The use of a 12-h deprivation period, toxic baits offered for 4 h, and absence of an artificial diet for adults of C. capitata at 5 days of age during the bioassay are considered adequate for evaluating formulations of toxic baits under laboratory conditions.
KeywordsToxicity methodology spinosad Mediterranean fruit fly
The first author gratefully acknowledges the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ) for a doctoral scholarship supporting research funding.
CAB planned, designed, and executed the experimental work and wrote the manuscript; DB conducted the data analyses and wrote the manuscript, MZN and JP planned and executed the experimental work, and FRMG and MB wrote the manuscript.
- Agrofit (2018) Sistema de agrotóxicos fitossanitários. Available at: http://extranet.agricultura. gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons. Accessed July 2016
- Araújo EL, Juliatti FC, Ferreira ADCL, Fernandes EC, Sousa MM (2013) Eficiência de acetamiprido e etofenproxi no controle de Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), na cultura da mangueira. ASCA: Agropec Cient Semi-árido 9:99–103Google Scholar
- Arita LH (1982) Reproductive and sexual maturity of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 24:25–29Google Scholar
- Baronio CA, Bernardi D, Paranhos BAJ, Garcia FRM, Botton M (2018) Population suppression of Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) on table grapes using toxic baits. An Acad Bras Ciênc. No preloGoogle Scholar
- Botton M, Arioli CJ, Machota-Jr R, Nunes MZ, Rosa JM (2016) Moscas-das-frutas na fruticultura de clima temperado: situação atual e perspectivas de controle através do emprego de novas formulações de iscas tóxicas e da captura massal. Rev Agropec Catarinense 29:103–107Google Scholar
- McQuate GT, Liquido NJ (2017) Host plants of invasive tephritid fruit fly species of economic importance. Int J Plant Biol Res 5:1072Google Scholar
- Medina P, Perez I, Budia F, Adan A, Vinuela E (2007) Development of an extended-laboratory method to test novel insecticides in bait formulation. IOBC/WPRS Bull 26:59–66Google Scholar
- Morelli R, Paranhos BAJ, Costa MLZ (2012) Eficiência de etofenproxi e acetamiprido no controle de mosca-do-mediterrâneo Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) em pomar de manga. Bioassay 7:1–4Google Scholar
- Paramasivam M, Selvi C (2017) Laboratory bioassay methods to assess the insecticide toxicity against insect pests-a review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5:1441–1445Google Scholar
- Raga A, Sato ME (2016) Controle Químico de moscas-das-frutas. Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, São Paulo, pp 1–14Google Scholar
- Raga A, Galdino LT (2018) Mosca das frutas: Atração Fatal. Cultivar 109:20–23Google Scholar
- Robertson JL, Russell RM, Preisler HK, Savin NE (2007) Bioassays with arthropods. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute (2011) SAS System - SAS/STAT. computer program, version 9.2. By SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 84pGoogle Scholar
- Zwolfer H (1983). Life system and strategies or resource exploitation in tephritids. In: The International Symposium on fruit flies of Economic Importance, 1982, Athens. Proceedings. Rotterdam: CEC, 1983. p. 16Google Scholar