Neotropical Entomology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 18–24 | Cite as

Diel Periodicity of 3-Methyl-2-Butenyl Butyrate Emissions by Bronze Bug Males Is Suppressed in the Presence of Females

  • H F GrobaEmail author
  • G Martínez
  • C Rossini
  • A González
Ecology, Behavior and Bionomics


The bronze bug, Thaumastocoris peregrinus Carpintero & Dellapé (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae), is an exotic emerging pest in Eucalyptus commercial forests in South America, Africa, and southern Europe. Information on the chemical communication system and reproductive ecology of this insect is scant, and it may be relevant for designing management strategies for eucalypt plantations. Males emit large amounts of 3-methyl-2-butenyl butyrate, which attracts conspecific adult males but not females. To learn more about the biological function of this putative male-produced pheromone, we quantified this compound in volatile emissions collected from males, females, and couples, in three 4-h collecting periods during the morning, afternoon, and night of a single 24-h cycle. Our results showed that virgin males emit 3-methyl-2-butenyl butyrate in a diel time pattern, with an almost sevenfold difference between the afternoon emission peak compared to morning or night hours. In addition, we show that in the presence of females, males emit the compound in the same amounts throughout the photocycle. While a definite function cannot yet be attributed to the emission of 3-methyl-2-butenyl butyrate by T. peregrinus males, our findings point to an intraspecific function, possibly one related to male–male competition.


Pheromones sexual behavior 3-methyl-2-butenyl butyrate Eucalyptus pests Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha: Thaumastocoridae 



We thank ANII for a post-doctoral fellowship to Hernán F. Groba and Gissel Cantero for the technical assistance with insect maintenance.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the National Agency for Science and Innovation of Uruguay (ANII), projects FSA-2009-3133 and FSA-2013-13033.


  1. Alcock J (1998) Animal behavior, 6th edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich JR, Rosi MC, Bin F (1995) Behavioral correlates for minor volatile compounds from stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J Chem Ecol 21(12):1907–1920. Google Scholar
  3. Barrozo RB, Schilman PE, Minoli SA (2004) Daily rhythms in disease-vector insects. Biol Rhythm Res 35(1-2):79–92. Google Scholar
  4. Borges M, Millar JG, Laumann RA, Moraes MCB (2007) A male-produced sex pheromone from the neotropical redbanded stink bug, Piezodorus guildinii (W.) J Chem Ecol 33(6):1235–1248. Google Scholar
  5. Branco S, Videira N, Branco M, Paiva MR (2015) A review of invasive alien species impacts on eucalypt stands and citrus orchards ecosystem services: towards an integrated management approach. J Environ Manag 149:17–26. Google Scholar
  6. Byers JA, Fefer D, Levi-Zada A (2013) Sex pheromone component ratios and mating isolation among three Lygus plant bug species of North America. Naturwissenschaften 100(12):1115–1123. Google Scholar
  7. Carpintero DL, Dellapé PM (2006) A new species of Thaumastocoris Kirkaldy from Argentina (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Thaumastocorinae). Zootaxa 1228:61–68Google Scholar
  8. Fountain M, Jåstad G, Hall D, Douglas P, Farman D, Cross J (2014) Further studies on sex pheromones of female Lygus and related bugs: development of effective lures and investigation of species-specificity. J Chem Ecol 40(1):71–83. Google Scholar
  9. Frati F, Chamberlain K, Birkett M, Dufour S, Mayon C, Wadhams L, Pickett J, Salerno G, Conti E, Bin F (2009) Vicia faba-Lygus rugulipennis interactions: induced plant volatiles and sex pheromone enhancement. J Chem Ecol 35(2):201–208. Google Scholar
  10. Garcia A, Figueiredo E, Valente C, Monserrat VJ, Branco M (2013) First record of Thaumastocoris peregrinus in Portugal and of the neotropical predator Hemerobius bolivari in Europe. Bull Insectology 66:251–256Google Scholar
  11. González A, Calvo MV, Cal V, Hernández V, Doño F, Alves L, Gamenara D, Rossini C, Martínez G (2012) A male aggregation pheromone in the bronze bug, Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Thaumastocoridae). Psyche (Stuttg) 2012:ID868474. Google Scholar
  12. Helfrich-förster C, Nitabach N, Holmes TC (2011) Insect circadian clock outputs. Essays Biochem 49(1):87–101. Google Scholar
  13. Jacobs DH, Neser S (2005) Thaumastocoris australicus Kirkaldy (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae): a new insect arrival in South Africa, damaging to Eucalyptus trees. S Afr J Sci 101:233–236Google Scholar
  14. Jiménez-Quiroz E, Vanegas-Rico JM, Morales-Martínez O, Lomeli-Flores JR, Rodríguez-Leyva E (2016) First record of the bronze bug, Thaumastocoris peregrinus Carpintero & Dellapé 2006 (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae), in Mexico. J Agric Urban Entomol 32(1):35–39. Google Scholar
  15. Johnstone RA (1995) Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev 70(1):1–65. Google Scholar
  16. Levi-Zada A, Fefer D, David M, Eliyahu M, Franco JC, Protasov A, Dunkelblum E, Mendel Z (2014) Diel periodicity of pheromone release by females of Planococcus citri and Planococcus ficus and the temporal flight activity of their conspecific males. Naturwissenschaften 101(8):671–678. Google Scholar
  17. Liu H, Zhao W, Yang M, Liu J, Zhang J (2013) Diel rhythms of sexual behavior and pheromone titers in Isoceras sibirica. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 84(1):15–26. Google Scholar
  18. Martínez G, Finozzi MV, Cantero G, Soler R, Dicke M, Gonzalez A (2017) Oviposition preference but not adult feeding preference matches with offspring performance in the bronze bug Thaumastocoris peregrinus. Entomol Exp Appl 163(1):1–11. Google Scholar
  19. Martínez G, López L, Cantero G, González A, Dicke M (2014) Life-history analysis of Thaumastocoris peregrinus in a newly designed mass rearing strategy. Bull Insectology 67:199–205Google Scholar
  20. Martins CBC, Soldi RA, Barbosa LR, Aldrich JR, Zarbin PHG (2012) Volatile chemicals of adults and nymphs of the Eucalyptus pest, Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae). Psyche (Stuttg) 2012:ID275128. Google Scholar
  21. Martins CBC, Zarbin PHG (2013) Volatile organic compounds of conspecific-damaged Eucalyptus benthamii influence responses of mated females of Thaumastocoris peregrinus. J Chem Ecol 39(5):602–611. Google Scholar
  22. Millar JG (2005) Pheromone of true bugs. In: Schulz S (ed) Topics in current chemistry: the chemistry of pheromones and other semiochemicals II, vol 240. Springer, Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 37–84Google Scholar
  23. Moore AJ (1997) The evolution of social signal: morphological, functional, and genetic integration of the sex pheromone in Nauphoeta cinerea. Evolution (N Y) 51:1920–1928Google Scholar
  24. Nadel RL, Noack AE (2012) Current understanding of the biology of Thaumastocoris peregrinus in the quest for a management strategy. Int J Pest Manag 58(3):257–266. Google Scholar
  25. Noack AE, Cassis G, Rose HA (2011) Systematic revision of Thaumastocoris Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae). Zootaxa 60:1–60Google Scholar
  26. Noack AE, Rose HA (2007) Life-history of Thaumastocoris peregrinus and Thaumastocoris sp. in the laboratory with some observations on behaviour. Gen Appl Entomol 36:27–34Google Scholar
  27. Paine TD, Steinbauer MJ, Lawson SA (2011) Native and exotic pests of Eucalyptus: a worldwide perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 56(1):181–201. Google Scholar
  28. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  29. Santadino M, Brentassi ME, Fanello DD, Coviella C (2017) First evidence of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae) feeding from mesophyll of Eucalyptus leaves. Environ Entomol 46:251–257. Google Scholar
  30. Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Slater JA (1973) A contribution to the biology and taxonomy of Australian Thaumastocoridae with the description of a new species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Aust J Entomol 12(2):151–156. Google Scholar
  32. Suma P, Nucifora S, Bella S (2014) New distribution record of the invasive bronze bug Thaumastocoris peregrinus Carpintero and Dellapé (Heteroptera, Thaumastocoridae) in Italy. EPPO Bull 44(2):179–182. Google Scholar
  33. Wäschke N, Meiners T, Rostás M (2013) Foraging strategies of parasitoids in complex chemical environments. In: Wajnberg E, Colazza S (eds) Chemical ecology of insect parasitoids. Wiley-Blackwell Publications, Oxford, pp 37–63Google Scholar
  34. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  35. Yasuda T, Shigehisa S, Yuasa K, Okutani-Akamtsu Y, Teramoto N, Watanabe T, Mochizuki F (2008) Sex attractant pheromone of the sorghum plant bug Stenotus rubrovittatus (Matsumura) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Appl Entomol Zool 43(2):219–226. Google Scholar
  36. Zahn DK, Moreira JA, Millar JG (2008) Identification, synthesis, and bioassay of a male-specific aggregation pheromone from the harlequin bug, Murgantia histrionica. J Chem Ecol 34(2):238–251. Google Scholar
  37. Zhang QH, Aldrich JR (2008) Sex pheromone of the plant bug, Phytocoris calli Knight. J Chem Ecol 34(6):719–724. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H F Groba
    • 1
    Email author
  • G Martínez
    • 2
  • C Rossini
    • 1
  • A González
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Ecología Química, Facultad de QuímicaUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Entomología, Estación Experimental INIA TacuarembóInstituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaTacuarembóUruguay

Personalised recommendations