Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 101–109 | Cite as

Preparation of nanohybrid electrocatalyst based on reduced graphene oxide sheets decorated with Pt nanoparticles for hydrogen evolution reaction

  • Shahram GhasemiEmail author
  • Sayed Reza Hosseini
  • Shima Nabipour
Original Paper


A nanohybrid of Pt nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide (Pt/rGO) is prepared and exploited for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in acidic medium. At first, glassy carbon electrode (GCE) is modified by graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets. Then, during the electrochemical reduction, GO film is converted to rGO. Finally, rGO/GCE is immersed in acidic solution of mM K2PtCl6 for 20 min and then with scanning the potential of electrode from 0.00 to − 0.20 V vs. NHE, Pt (IV) ions are reduced to Pt. Characterization of Pt/rGO nanohybrid is achieved by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy. FESEM images confirm that on the surface of rGO film, Pt nanoparticles with size in the range of 5–15 nm are formed. Electrochemical experiments reveal that Pt/RGO/GCE exhibits a small onset potential of − 0.03 V vs. NHE and Tafel slope of about 33 mV dec− 1 for HER. Pt/rGO/GCE has higher electrocatalytic activity for HER than rGO/GCE and Pt/GCE. In addition, the nanohybrid presents an enhanced catalytic activity towards HER than bare Pt electrode. It is observed that the current density of HER at the Pt/rGO nanohybrid shows a little decrease after 1000 continuous potential cycles which means the good stability of the catalyst. In addition, chronoamperometric studies show that Pt/rGO/GCE exhibits a noticeable stability for HER. The obtained results allege that Pt/rGO nanohybrid can surmount the overvoltage of HER and can be used as promising electrocatalyst in HER in acidic medium.


Hydrogen evolution reaction Pt nanoparticles Graphene oxide nanosheets Nanohybrid Electrocatalyst 


  1. 1.
    B. Rezaei, M. Mokhtarianpour, A.A. Ensafi, Hydrogen evolution reaction and formic acid oxidation by decorated nanostructural Pt/Pd on a copper-filled nanoporous stainless steel. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 15, 955–965 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Duan, S. Chen, M. Jaroniec, S.Z. Qiao, Porous C3N4 nanolayers@N-graphene films as catalyst electrodes for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano 9, 931–940 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.A. Ensafi, F. Ghadirian, M. Jafari-Asl, B. Rezaei, WS2 grafted on silicon and nano-silicon particles etched: a high-performance electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 15, 613–620 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Hou, W. Zhou, X. Liu, K. Zhou, J. Xie, G. Li, S. Chen, Pt nanoparticles/MoS2 nanosheets/carbon fibers as efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta 166, 26–31 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. T.Yang, H. Du, M. Zhu, Zhang, M. Zou, Immobilization of Pt nanoparticles in carbon nanofibers: bifunctional catalyst for hydrogen evolution and electrochemical sensor. Electrochim. Acta 167, 48–54 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Kim, H.D. Lim, J. Kim, K. Kang, Graphene for advanced Li/S and Li/air batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 33–47 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.L. Zhang, R. Zhou, X.S. Zhao, Graphene-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 5983–5992 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. He, K. Cheng, T. Peng, M. Pan, S. Mu, Graphene/carbon nanospheres sandwich supported PEM fuel cell metal nanocatalysts with remarkably high activity and stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 2126–2132 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Li, L. Tang, J. Li, Preparation and electrochemical performance for methanol oxidation of pt/graphene nanocomposites. Electrochem. Commun. 11, 846–849 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Ma, X. Shen, H. Zhou, G. Zhu, Z. Ji, K. Chen, CoP nanoparticles deposited on reduced graphene oxide sheets as an active electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 5337–5343 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.H. Mashhadizadeh, N. Naseri, M.A. Mehrgardi, A simple non-enzymatic strategy for adenosine triphosphate electrochemical aptasensor using silver nanoparticle-decorated graphene oxide. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 14, 2007–2016 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Facile and green solvothermal synthesis of palladium nanoparticle-nanodiamond-graphene oxide material with improved bifunctional catalytic properties. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 14, 2503–2512 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Liu, S. Fu, B. Yuan, Y. Li, Z. Deng, Toward a universal “adhesive nanosheet” for the assembly of multiple nanoparticles based on a protein-induced reduction/decoration of graphene oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7279–7281 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Ojani, R. Valiollahi, J.B. Raoof, Comparison between graphene supported Pt hollow nanospheres and graphene supported Pt solid nanoparticles for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy 74, 871–876 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Xu, J. Hui, T. Huang, Y. Chen, J. Lee, Platinum nanocuboids supported on reduced graphene oxide as efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Power Sources 285, 393–399 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Navaee, A. Salimi, Anodic platinum dissolution, entrapping by amine functionalized-reduced graphene oxide: a simple approach to derive the uniform distribution of platinum nanoparticles with efficient electrocatalytic activity for durable hydrogen evolution and ethanol oxidation. Electrochim. Acta 211, 322–3301 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Devadas, T. Imae, Hydrogen evolution reaction efficiency by low loading of platinum nanoparticles protected by dendrimers on carbon materials. Electrochem. Commun. 72, 135–139 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Döner, F. Tezcan, G. Kardaş, Electrocatalytic behavior of the Pd-modified electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 3881–3888 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Abbaspour, F. NorouzSarvestani, High electrocatalytic effect of Au–Pd alloy nanoparticles electrodeposited on microwave assisted sol–gel-derived carbon ceramic electrode for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 1883–1891 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Smiljanic, Z. Rakocevic, A. Maksic, S. Strbac, Hydrogen evolution reaction on platinum catalyzed by palladium and rhodium nanoislands. Electrochim. Acta 117, 336–343 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Kedzierzawski, D. Oleszak, M. Janik-Czachor, Hydrogen evolution on hot and cold consolidated Ni–Mo alloys produced by mechanical alloying. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 300, 105–112 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Kibsgaard, Z. Chen, B. Reinecke, T.F. Jaramillo, Engineering the surface structure of MoS2 to preferentially expose active edge sites for electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 11, 963–969 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.J. Smith, Y.H. Chang, K. Raidongia, T.Y. Chen, L.J. Li, J. Huang, Molybdenum sulfide supported on crumpled graphene balls for electrocatalytic hydrogen production. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1–6 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Ojani, J.B. Raoof, E. Hasheminejad, One-step electroless deposition of Pd/Pt bimetallic microstructures by galvanic replacement on copper substrate and investigation of its performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 92–99 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.B. Raoof, R. Ojani, S.A. Esfeden, S.R. Nadimi fabrication of bimetallic Cu/Pt nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode and its catalytic activity toward hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 3937–3944 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Rezaei, M. Mokhtarianpour, A.A. Ensafi, Fabricated of bimetallic Pd/Pt nanostructure deposited on copper nanofoam substrate by galvanic replacement as an effective electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40, 6754–6762 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W.S. Hummers, R.E. Offeman, Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339–1339 (1958). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Ghasemi, S.R. Hosseini, P. Asen, Preparation of graphene/nickel-iron hexacyanoferrate coordination polymer nanocomposite for electrochemical energy storage. Electrochim. Acta 160, 337–346 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Yang, S. Gunasekaran, Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide sheets for use in high performance supercapacitors. Carbon 51, 36–44 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    X.Y. Peng, X.X. Liu, D. Diamond, K.T. Lau, Synthesis of electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide film with controllable size and thickness and its use in supercapacitor. Carbon 49, 3488–3496 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R.A. Wasthi, R.N. Singh, Graphene-supported Pd–Ru nanoparticles with superior methanol electrooxidation activity. Carbon 51, 282–289 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Ghasemi, F. Ahmadi, Effect of surfactant on the electrochemical performance of graphene/iron oxide electrode for supercapacitor. J. Power Sources 289, 129–137 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. Dong, R.R.S. Gari, Z. Li, M.M. Craig, S. Hou, Graphene-supported platinum and platinum–ruthenium nanoparticles with high electrocatalytic activity for methanol and ethanol oxidation. Carbon 48, 781–787 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Ma, Y. Dai, M. Guo, C. Niu, B. Huang, Graphene adhesion on MoS2 monolayer: an ab initio study. Nanoscale 3, 3883–3887 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Pierozynski, Hydrogen evolution reaction at Pd-modified carbon fiber and nickel-coated carbon fiber materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 7733–7740 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Barber, S. Morin, B. Conway, Specificity of the kinetics of H2 evolution to the structure of single-crystal Pt surfaces, and the relation between opd and upd H. J. Electroanal. Chem. 446, 125–138 (1998). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Ramadoss, S.J. Kim, Improved activity of a graphene–TiO2 hybrid electrode in an electrochemical supercapacitor. Carbon 63, 434–445 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iranian Chemical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of MazandaranBabolsarIran
  2. 2.Nanochemistry Research Laboratory, Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of MazandaranBabolsarIran

Personalised recommendations