Advertisement

Experimental characterization of a novel balsa cored sandwich structure with fiber metal laminate skins

  • Moslem Najafi
  • Reza Ansari
  • Abolfazl Darvizeh
Original Research
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Balsa cored sandwich structures with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) skins are widely used to produce lightweight, high-stiffness and cost-effective structural components used in marine applications. However, balsa is a hydrophilic material, which is severely susceptible to moisture attacks. Unintended water penetration from the damaged FRP skins into the balsa cored sandwich structures can lead to the core decay and delamination of the core near the free edges. Thus, in this work, a concept for improving the damage tolerance of balsa cored sandwich structures by replacing the FRP skins with fiber metal laminates (FMLs) is proposed. To characterize the mechanical properties of these novel sandwich structures, a wide range of mechanical tests including three-point bending, edgewise compression with buckling as well as Charpy and high-velocity impact test were carried out on balsa cored sandwich specimens made of FMLs. A traditional sandwich structure made of woven E-glass fiber/epoxy skins was also prepared and tested for exploring the effect of skin material on the mechanical response of the studied sandwich structures. The experimental results showed that balsa cored sandwich structures composed of FML skins have an outstanding mechanical performance compared with those having the E-glass fiber/epoxy skins.

Keywords

Fiber metal laminates (FMLs) Balsa core Flexural properties Buckling behavior Impact properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Baştürk SB, Tanoğlu M (2013) Development and mechanical behavior of FML/aluminium foam sandwiches. Appl Compos Mater 20:789–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Najafi M, Darvizeh A, Ansari R (2018) Characterization of moisture effects on novel agglomerated cork core sandwich composites with fiber metal laminate facesheets. J Sandw Struct Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218789613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sadeghian P, Hristozov D, Wroblewski L (2016) Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: comparison of natural and synthetic materials. J Sandw Struct Mater 20:287–3071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang H, Ramakrishnan KR, Shankar K (2016) Experimental study of the medium velocity impact response of sandwich panels with different cores. Mater Des 99:68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohammadi MS, Nairn JA (2014) Crack propagation and fracture toughness of solid balsa used for cores of sandwich composites. J Sandw Struct Mater 16:22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimitrov N, Berggreen C (2015) Probabilistic fatigue life of balsa cored sandwich composites subjected to transverse shear. J Sandw Struct Mater 17:562–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fathi A, Wolff-Fabris F, Altstädt V, Gätzi R (2013) An investigation on the flexural properties of balsa and polymer foam core sandwich structures: influence of core type and contour finishing options. J Sandw Struct Mater 15:487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tagarielli VL, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2007) The dynamic response of composite sandwich beams to transverse impact. Int J Solids Struct 44:2442–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atas C, Sevim C (2010) On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam. Compos Struct 93:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jover N, Shafiq B, Vaidya U (2014) Ballistic impact analysis of balsa core sandwich composites. Compos Part B Eng 67:160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhong Y, Joshi SC (2015) Response of hygrothermally aged GLARE 4A laminates under static and cyclic loadings. Mater Des 87:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Najafi M, Darvizeh A, Ansari R (2018) Effect of salt water conditioning on novel fiber metal laminates for marine applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718767946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Najafi M, Ansari R, Darvizeh A (2017) Environmental effects on mechanical properties of glass/epoxy and fiber metal laminates. Part I: hygrothermal aging. Mech Adv Compos Struct 4:187–196Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Najafi M, Ansari R, Darvizeh A (2017) Environmental effects on mechanical properties of glass/epoxy and fiber metal laminates. Part II: isothermal aging. Mech Adv Compos Struct 4:197–205Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reyes G (2010) Mechanical behavior of thermoplastic FML-reinforced sandwich panels using an aluminum foam core: experiments and modeling. J Sandw Struct Mater 12:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Villanueva GR, Cantwell WJ (2004) The high-velocity impact response of composite and FML reinforced sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 64:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haro EE, Szpunar JA, Odeshi AG (2016) Ballistic impact response of laminated hybrid materials made of 5086-H32 aluminum alloy, epoxy and Kevlar fabrics impregnated with shear thickening fluid. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 87:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Bella G, Calabrese L, Borsellino C (2012) Mechanical characterisation of a glass/polyester sandwich structure for marine applications. Mater Des 42:486–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferreira R, Pereira D, Gago A, Proença J (2016) Experimental characterisation of cork agglomerate core sandwich panels for wall assemblies in buildings. J Build Eng 5:194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bozkurt OY, Erklig A, Bulut M (2016) Hybridization effects on Charpy impact behavior of basalt/aramid fiber reinforced hybrid composite laminates. Polym Compos 39:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khalili SMR, Mittal RK, Gharibi Kalibar S (2005) A study of the mechanical properties of steel/aluminium/GRP laminates. Mater Sci Eng 412:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shokrieh MM, Torabizadeh MA, Fereidoon A (2011) Dynamic failure behavior of glass/epoxy composites under low temperature using Charpy impact test method. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 18:211–220Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong KJ, Nirmal U, Lim BK (2010) Impact behavior of short and continuous fiber-reinforced polyester composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 29:3463–3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deka LJ (2008) Quasi-static and multi-site high-velocity impact response of composite structures, Ph.D. thesis, University of Alabama, Birmingham, ALGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBandar Anzali Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityBandar AnzaliIran

Personalised recommendations