Advertisement

Date palm seed as suitable filler material in glass–epoxy composites

  • Heba I. Elkhouly
  • Ragab K. Abdel-Magied
  • Mohamed F. Aly
Original Research
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Natural materials as polymer fillers are proposed for applications in different industries due to their good prices, acceptable mechanical behaviors, and their improved environmental footprint. The aim of this work is to study the mechanical characteristics of glass fiber (G–E) filled with date seed (DS) as potential polymer filler. DS is produced during the processing of fruit plant (Phoenix dactylifera L.). G–E hybrid composite is reinforced with angle-ply [(± 45)4]S using DS powder by applying the semi-automatic technique (SAT). The effects of DS filler on wear rate (Ks) and impact energy at different efficient parameters were investigated. Technical and economical comparisons between the DS filler and inorganic fillers [e.g., silicon carbide (SiC), aluminum oxide (AL2O3)] were carried out. Surface inspection was conducted using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the nature of reinforcement was investigated using Fourier-transform infra red (FTIR). The results revealed that the addition of 10% DS reinforcement to G–E improved the wear resistance rate and increased toughness by about 71% and 80%, respectively. FTIR results indicated that a physicochemical interaction has occurred between G–E and the organic DS filler contact surfaces. Finally, G–E reinforcement optimization was carried out by minimizing the wear rate, determining the optimum filler load and type, normal load, and abrasive size. The obtained results showed the effectiveness of the DS as filler for G–E fibers from technical and economical point of views.

Keywords

Abrasive Date seed Glass–epoxy Organic Wear 

References

  1. 1.
    Koksal S, Ficici F, Kayikci R, Savas O (2012) Experimental optimization of dry sliding wear behavior of in situ AlB2/Al composite based on Taguchi’s method. Mater Des 42:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basavarajaa S, Joshi A, Arun K, Kumar A, Kumar M (2009) Three-body abrasive wear behaviour of polymer matrix composites filled with SiC particles. Polym Plast Technol Eng 49:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aramide FO, Atanda PO, Olorunniwo OO (2012) Mechanical properties of a polyester fibre glass composite. Int J Compos Mater 2:147–151Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu GC, Wu LZ, Feng LJ, Yang W (2016) Thermal and mechanical properties of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites with a 3D thermal conductive pathway. Compos Struct 149:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    López FA, Martin MI, Alguacil FJ, Rincón JM, Centeno TA, Romero M (2012) Thermolysis of fibreglass polyester composite and reutilisation of the glass fibre residue to obtain a glass–ceramic material. J Anal Appl Pyrol 93:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basavarajaa S, Ellangovan S, Arun K (2009) Studies on dry sliding wear behavior of graphite filled glass–epoxy composites. Mater Des 30:2670–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalbehera S, Acharya S (2015) Effect of cenosphere addition on erosive wear behaviour of jute-glass reinforced composite using Taguchi experimental design. Mater Today Proc 2:2389–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Annaa A, Basavarajaa S (2014) Studies on dry sliding wear behavior of functionally graded graphite particle-filled glass–epoxy composites. Compos Interf 21:395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sivapragash M, Kumaradhas P, Stanly B, Felix A, Pillai U (2016) Taguchi based genetic approach for optimizing the PVD process parameter for coating ZrN on AZ91D magnesium alloy. Mater Des 90:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdel-Magied RK, Aly MF, Elkhouly HI (2018) The effect of fiber orientation on wear behavior of glass fiber–epoxy filled with particles. Ind Lub Tribol 70(8):1552–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarifuddin N, Ismail H, Ahmad Z (2013) The effect of kenaf core fiber loading on properties of low density polyethylene/thermoplastic sago starch/kenaf core fiber composites. J Phys Sci 24:97–115Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruggiero A, Merola M, Carlone P (2015) Archodoulaki and tribo-mechanical characterization of reinforced epoxy resin under dry and lubricated contact conditions. Compos Part B Eng 79:595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sabeel A, Vijayarangan S, Naidu C (2007) Elastic properties notched strength, fracture criterion in untreated woven jute–glass fabric reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Mater Des 28:2287–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zahedi M, Khanjanzadeh H, Pirayesh H, Saadatnia M (2015) Utilization of natural montmorillonite modified with dimethyl, dehydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium salt as reinforcement in almond shell flour–polypropylene bio-nanocomposites. Compos Part B 71:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassaini L, Kaci M, Touati N, Pillin I, Kervoelen A, Bruzaud S (2017) Valorization of olive husk flour as a filler for biocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate): effects of silane treatment. Polym Test 59:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng CB, Md Akil H, Nasir R, Khan A (2015) Optimization on wear performance of UHMWPE composites using response surface methodology. Tribol Int 88:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prasad N, Agarwal VK, Sinha S (2016) Banana fiber reinforced low-density polyethylene composites: effect of chemical treatment and compatibilizer addition. Iran Polym J 25:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bensalah H, Gueraoui K, Essabir H, Rodrigue D, Bouhfid R, Qaiss A (2017) Mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of polypropylene hybrid composites based clay and graphite. J Compos Mater 51:3563–3576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valášek P (2015) Mechanical properties of polymer composites based on bioparticles (Jatropha curcas L.). J Teknol 76:1–5Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    García-García D, Carbonell A, Samper MD, García-Sanoguera D, Balart R (2015) Green composites based on polypropylene matrix and hydrophobized spend coffee ground (SCG) powder. Compos Part B 78:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang L, Mu B, Yi X, Li S, Wang Q (2016) Sustainable use of coffee husks for reinforcing polyethylene composites. J Polym Environ 26:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agunsoye JO, Bello SA, Adetola LO (2018) Experimental investigation and theoretical prediction of tensile properties of Delonix regia seed particle reinforced polymeric composites. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang H (2004) Rice-husk flour filled polypropylene composites; mechanical, morphological study. Compos Struct 63:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang D, Yan D, Ma S, Wang X (2018) Scandium on the formation of in situ TiB2 particulates in an aluminum matrix. J Mater Res 33:2721–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valášek P, Ruggiero A, Müller M (2017) Experimental description of strength and tribological characteristic of EFB oil palm fibres/epoxy composites with technologically undemanding preparation. Compos Part B Eng 122:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Basavarajappa S, Ellangovan S (2012) Dry sliding wear characteristics of glass-epoxy composite filled with silicon carbide and graphite particles. Wear 296:491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patnaik A, Satapathy A (2009) Erosion wear response of flyash–glass fiber–polyester composites: a study using Taguchi experimental design. Malays Polym J 4:13–28Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suresha V, Chandramohan G, Samapthkumaran P, Seetharamu S, vynatheya S (2006) Friction and wear characteristics of carbon-epoxy and glass-epoxy woven roving fiber composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 25:771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Al-Khayri J, Jain S, Johnson D (2015) Date palm genetic resources, and utilization. Africa and the Americas, vol 1. Springer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibrahem RA (2015) Effect of date palm seeds on the tribological behaviour of polyester composites under different testing conditions. Mater Sci Eng 4:256–265Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iyer K, Torkelson J (2014) Green composites of polypropylene and eggshell: effective bio-filler size reduction and dispersion by single-step processing with solid-state shear pulverization. Compos Sci Technol 102:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mittal V, Chaudhry A, Matsko N (2014) True biocomposites with biopolyesters and date seed powder: mechanical, thermal, and degradation properties. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–7Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ruggiero A, Valek P, Miller M (2016) Exploitation of waste date seeds of Phoenix dactylifera in form of polymeric particle investigation on adhesion, cohesion and wear. Compos Part B Eng 104:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simonassi N, Pereira A, Monteiro S, Muylaert F (2017) Reinforcement of polyester with renewable ramie fibers. Mater Res 20:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramesh B, Suresha B (2014) Optimization of tribological parameters in abrasive wear mode of carbon–epoxy hybrid composites. Mater Des 59:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nikolic G, Zlatkovic S, Cakic S, Lacnjevac C, Rajic Z (2010) Fast Fourier transform IR characterization of epoxy GY systems crosslinked with aliphatic and cycloaliphatic EH polyamine adducts. Sensors 10:684–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heba I. Elkhouly
    • 1
  • Ragab K. Abdel-Magied
    • 2
  • Mohamed F. Aly
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Production TechnologyBeni-Suef UniversityBeni-SuefEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringBeni-Suef UniversityBeni-SuefEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringFayoum UniversityFayoumEgypt

Personalised recommendations