Advertisement

Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Wear response of glass fiber and ceramic tile-reinforced hybrid epoxy matrix composites

  • Gokhan AcikbasEmail author
  • Bilge Yaman
Original Research
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents the tribological behavior of epoxy matrix composites containing two different fillers. The composites contain fillers with different particle sizes (< 90 µm and in the range of 150–300 µm) and different wall tile to glass fiber waste ratios (55:5, 50:10 and 40:20). The total amount of filler was fixed to 60 wt% in all of the composites to reveal the effect of variations in filler content on properties. The physico-mechanical properties, such as bulk density, porosity, impact resistance, shore hardness, flexural strength and wear characteristics of developed materials were determined. Tribological tests were carried out by ball-on-disk configuration and rotational sliding at room temperature against 6-Co/WC ball with a diameter of 3 mm. 3N of constant test load was applied and the wear distance was kept as 400 m. The results showed that the steady-state coefficient of frictions was changed in the range 0.38–0.47 and the wear rate was obtained between 1.74 × 10−5 and 1.09 × 10−4 mm3/Nm. When the coarser particle size filler was used, it resulted in worsening of the wear resistance. It can generally be concluded that the properties were improved with the increasing amount of wall tile addition, and also better properties were obtained in both types of filled composites compared to the epoxy matrix.

Keywords

Hybrid composites Epoxy Fabrication Ceramics Mechanical properties Tribology 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang RM, Zheng SR, Zheng YP (2011) Polymer matrix composites and technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited (Science), CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK (2017) Hybrid polymer composite materials. Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashori A (2010) Hybrid composites from waste materials. J Polym Environ 18:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koleva M, Zheglova A, Fidancevska E, Vassilev V (2011) In: Pavla T (ed) Composites containing waste materials, 1st edn. INTECH Open Access, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elbeyli IY (2004) Utilization of industrial borax wastes (BW) for Portland cement production. Turkish J Eng Environ Sci 28:281–287Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karaşahin M, Terzi S (2007) Evaluation of marble waste dust in the mixture of asphaltic concrete. Constr Build Mater 21:616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tunali A, Selli NT (2014) Recycling ceramic production wastes of Eczacibasi Building Group Bozuyuk Campus. AKU J Sci Eng OZ573314:209–212Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acıkbas G, Ozcan S, Acıkbas NC (2017) Production and characterization of a hybrid polymer matrix composite. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24471 (In press) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abd El-baky MA, Attia MA, Kamel M (2018) Flexural fatigue and failure probability analysis of polypropylene-glass hybrid fibres reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Plast Rubber Compos 47:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-baky MAA (2018) Impact performance of hybrid laminated composites with statistical analysis. Iran Polym J 27:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kavas T (2006) Use of boron waste as a fluxing agent in production of red mud brick. Build Environ 41:1779–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christogerou A, Kavas T, Pontikes Y, Koyas S, Tabak Y, Angelopoulos GN (2009) Use of boron wastes in the production of heavy clay ceramics. Ceram Int 35:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kavas T, Christogerou A, Pontikes Y, Angelopoulos GN (2011) Valorisation of different types of boron-containing wastes for the production of lightweight aggregates. J Hazard Mater 185:1381–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Özdemir M, Öztürk NU (2003) Utilization of clay wastes containing boron as cement additives. Cement Concrete Res 33:1659–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Celik H (2015) Recycling of boron waste to develop ceramic wall tile in Turkey. Trans Indian Ceram Soc 74:108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ercenk E, Sen U, Bayrak G, Yilmaz S (2014) Glass and glass-ceramics produced from fly ash and boron waste. Acta Phys Pol A 125:626–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uslu T, Arol AI (2004) Use of boron waste as an additive in red bricks. Waste Manag 24:217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castro AM, Ribeiro MCS, Santos J, Meixedo JP, Silva FJ, Fiúza A, Alvim MR (2013) Sustainable waste recycling solution for the glass fibre reinforced polymer composite materials industry. Constr Build Mater 45:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yaman B, Calis Acikbas N (2018) Dry sliding behavior of boron waste reinforced epoxy matrix composites. J Boron 3:62–70Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Acikbas NC, Acikbas G (2017) Epoxy matrix composites containing urea formaldehyde waste particulate filler. Waste Biomass Valori 8:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomas C, Borges PHR, Panzera TH, Cimentada A, Lombillo I (2014) Epoxy composites containing CFRP powder wastes. Compos Part B 59:260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Açıkbaş G, Göçmez H (2017) Effect of vitreous china sanitary ware waste amount on polyester matrix composite properties. APJES 5:138–145Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Acikbas G (2016) Development and characterization of polymer matrix composite materials alternative to ceramic sanitary wares. PhD Theis, Dumlupınar University, Institute of Science, KutahyaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uygunoglu T, Gunes I, Brostow W (2015) Physical and mechanical properties of polymer composites with high content of wastes including boron. Mater Res 18:1188–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gore GJ, Gates JD (1997) Effect of hardness on three very different forms of wear. Wear 203:544–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agrawal S, Singh KK, Sarkar PK (2016) A comparative study of wear and friction characteristics of glass fibre reinforced epoxy resin, sliding under dry, oil-lubricated and inert gas environments. Tribol Int 96:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kishore, Sampathkumaran P, Seetharamu S, Thomas P, Janardhana M (2005) A study on the effect of the type and content of filler in epoxy–glass composite system on the friction and slide wear characteristics. Wear 259:634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgy Program, Vocational SchoolBilecik Seyh Edebali UniversityBilecikTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations