International Cancer Conference Journal

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 77–80 | Cite as

A cadaveric demonstration of visualization of the urethra using a lighted stent during transanal intersphincteric resection

  • Tomoaki OkadaEmail author
  • Kenji Kawada
  • Tatsuro Nakamura
  • Ryosuke Okamura
  • Koya Hida
  • Akihiro Takai
  • Seiji Matsuda
  • Yoshiharu Sakai
Video Article


Urethral injury is one of the crucial intraoperative complications during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for male patients with low rectal cancer. Urethral injury can occur during the anterior dissection around the inferior lobe of the prostate and the membranous urethra. A tool to visualize the urethra around this area would be useful to avoid urethral injury. We report a cadaveric demonstration of visualization of the urethra using a lighted stent during transanal intersphincteric resection. The lighted stent (InfraVision Ureteral Kit, Stryker) was placed through the irrigation channel of a clear three-way urinary catheter. After the anterior dissection, the visibility of the lighted stent was investigated under the three laparoscopic light conditions: (1) normal intensity; (2) low intensity; and (3) turned-off. In the proper dissection plane that led to preservation of the urethra, the lighted stent was hardly visible under the normal-intensity condition, but it was clearly visible under the turned-off condition. In the improper dissection plane that led to urethral injury, the lighted stent was clearly visible under both the normal-intensity and the turned-off conditions. Visualization of the urethra using the lighted stent under the turned-off condition of the laparoscopic light can be useful to avoid inadvertent urethral injury during the anterior dissection of male taTME. Clear visibility of the lighted stent under the normal-intensity condition can indicate that the dissection plane is too close to the urethra.


taTME Urethral injury Lighted stent Urethral identification 



This study was funded by the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 226194 KB)


  1. 1.
    Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Monson JR (2016) Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 20(7):483–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174(3):185–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Drake J et al (2015) The use of a lighted stent as a method for identifying the urethra in male patients undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision: a video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol 19(6):375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atallah S, Mabardy A, Volpato AP et al (2017) Surgery beyond the visible light spectrum: theoretical and applied methods for localization of the male urethra during transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 21(6):413–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Breast SurgeryEhime University Graduate School of MedicineToon, EhimeJapan
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy and EmbryologyEhime University Graduate School of MedicineToon, EhimeJapan

Personalised recommendations