Women’s Use of Social Media: What Is the Evidence About Their Impact on Weight Management and Body Image?

  • Audrée-Anne Dumas
  • Sophie DesrochesEmail author
Psychological Issues (V Drapeau and V Ivezaj, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychological Issues


Purpose of the Review

This review aims to summarize recent research on the effects of social media-delivered weight management interventions on weight loss and the impact of social media use on body image concerns in women and adolescent girls.

Recent Findings

Evidence supports the feasibility, but not the efficacy, of studies using single-component social media-delivered weight management interventions (i.e., including no other modes of intervention delivery) in women. Studies conducted in adolescent girls and women suggest that the impact of social media on body image outcomes is mostly detrimental, but is dependent on the context (e.g., exposure to idealized social media appearance images), peers’ feedback, and constructs, such as appearance comparison tendency.


More research is needed to conclude on the efficacy of social media-delivered interventions on both weight and body image outcomes and to understand how and when exposure to social media could promote effective weight management and also advocate positive body image in women.


Social media Weight management Body image Women’s health Adolescents Review 


Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanter R, Caballero B. Global gender disparities in obesity: a review. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(4):491–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garawi F, Devries K, Thorogood N, Uauy R. Global differences between women and men in the prevalence of obesity: is there an association with gender inequality? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:1101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F, Stevens GA, Woodward M, Wormser D, et al. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e65174.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearson-Stuttard J, Zhou B, Kontis V, Bentham J, Gunter MJ, Ezzati M. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to diabetes and high body-mass index: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(6):e6–e15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Apovian CM. The clinical and economic consequences of obesity. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(11 Suppl):s219–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image. 2015;14:118–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiseman CV, Gray JJ, Mosimann JE, Ahrens AH. Cultural expectations of thinness in women: an update. Int J Eat Disord. 1992;11(1):85–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Girard M, Rodgers RF, Chabrol H. Prospective predictors of body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, and muscularity concerns among young women in France: a sociocultural model. Body Image. 2018;26:103–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cash TF, Smolak L. Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. New York; 2011. 490 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calden G, Lundy RM, Schlafer RJ. Sex differences in body concepts. J Consult Psychol. 1959;23(4):378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tiggemann M. Body image across the adult life span: stability and change. Body Image. 2004;1(1):29–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Algars M, Santtila P, Varjonen M, Witting K, Johansson A, Jern P, et al. The adult body: how age, gender, and body mass index are related to body image. J Aging Health. 2009;21(8):1112–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gillen MM. Associations between positive body image and indicators of men's and women's mental and physical health. Body Image. 2015;13:67–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons. 2010;53(1):59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghaznavi J, Taylor LD. Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: an analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image. 2015;14:54–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith A, Anderson M. Social media use in 2018. Pew Res Center. 2018.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anderson M, Jiang J. Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Res Center:2018.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mendoza JA, Baker KS, Moreno MA, Whitlock K, Abbey-Lambertz M, Waite A, et al. A Fitbit and Facebook mhealth intervention for promoting physical activity among adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors: a pilot study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(12).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fonseca H, Prioste A, Sousa P, Gaspar P, Machado MC. Effectiveness analysis of an internet-based intervention for overweight adolescents: next steps for researchers and clinicians. BMC Obesity. 2016;3:15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cavallo DN, Sisneros JA, Ronay AA, Robbins CL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Keyserling TC, et al. Assessing the feasibility of a web-based weight loss intervention for low-income women of reproductive age: a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1):e30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cadmus-Bertram L, Nelson SH, Hartman S, Patterson RE, Parker BA, Pierce JP. Randomized trial of a phone- and web-based weight loss program for women at elevated breast cancer risk: the HELP study. J Behav Med. 2016;39(4):551–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity. 2013;21(1):25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Prout Parks E, Moore RH, Li Z, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Garrett AR, Hill DL, et al. Assessing the feasibility of a social media to promote weight management engagement in adolescents with severe obesity: pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(3):e52 This recent single-arm feasibility study provides evidence for recommending the use of social media (i.e., a private Facebook group in this context) as an adjunct to traditional weight management to promote treatment engagement and decrease clinic attrition rates in adolescents with severe obesity, thus opening the door for more research in this area. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruotsalainen H, Kyngas H, Tammelin T, Heikkinen H, Kaariainen M. Effectiveness of Facebook-delivered lifestyle counselling and physical activity self-monitoring on physical activity and body mass index in overweight and obese adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Nurs Res Pract. 2015;2015:159205.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Valle CG, Tate DF, Mayer DK, Allicock M, Cai J. A randomized trial of a Facebook-based physical activity intervention for young adult cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(3):355–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Waring ME, Moore Simas TA, Oleski J, Xiao RS, Mulcahy JA, May CN, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of delivering a postpartum weight loss intervention via Facebook: a pilot study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018;50(1):70–4.e1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP, Hamilton HA. Associations between the use of social networking sites and unhealthy eating behaviours and excess body weight in adolescents. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(11):1941–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pagoto S, Schneider KL, Evans M, Waring ME, Appelhans B, Busch AM, et al. Tweeting it off: characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(6):1032–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):370–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Powell K, Wilcox J, Clonan A, Bissell P, Preston L, Peacock M, et al. The role of social networks in the development of overweight and obesity among adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:996.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chung CK. Predicting weight loss in blogs using computerized text analysis. US, ProQuest Information & Learning; 2010.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leggatt-Cook C, Chamberlain K. Blogging for weight loss: personal accountability, writing selves, and the weight-loss blogosphere. Sociol Health Illness. 2012;34(7):963–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Evans M, Faghri PD, Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Waring ME, Whited MC, et al. The weight loss blogosphere: an online survey of weight loss bloggers. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(3):403–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chou W-yS, Prestin A, Kunath S. Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):314–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lydecker JA, Cotter EW, Palmberg AA, Simpson C, Kwitowski M, White K, et al. Does this Tweet make me look fat? A content analysis of weight stigma on Twitter. Eat Weight Disord. 2016;21(2):229–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Brun A, McCarthy M, McKenzie K, McGloin A. Weight stigma and narrative resistance evident in online discussions of obesity. Appetite. 2014;72:73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferguson CJ, Munoz ME, Garza A, Galindo M. Concurrent and prospective analyses of peer, television and social media influences on body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms and life satisfaction in adolescent girls. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(1):1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee HE, Taniguchi E, Modica A, Park H. Effects of witnessing fat talk on body satisfaction and psychological well-being: a cross-cultural comparison of Korea and the United States. Soc Behav Pers. 2013;41(8):1279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wade A. The impacts of exposure to fat talk and fat talk challenging through social media on women. US: ProQuest Inf Learn; 2017.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Eckler P, Kalyango Y, Paasch E. Facebook use and negative body image among U.S. college women. Women Health. 2017;57(2):249–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fardouly J, Willburger BK, Vartanian LR. Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: testing mediational pathways. New Media Soc. 2018;20(4):1380–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fox J, Vendemia MA. Selective self-presentation and social comparison through photographs on social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(10):593–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hanna E, Ward LM, Seabrook RC, Jerald M, Reed L, Giaccardi S, et al. Contributions of social comparison and self-objectification in mediating associations between Facebook use and emergent adults’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(3):172–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Howard LM, Heron KE, MacIntyre RI, Myers TA, Everhart RS. Is use of social networking sites associated with young women's body dissatisfaction and disordered eating? A look at Black-White racial differences. Body Image. 2017;23:109–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meier EP, Gray J. Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(4):199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Strubel J, Petrie TA. Love me Tinder: body image and psychosocial functioning among men and women. Body Image. 2017;21:34–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Walker M, Thornton L, De Choudhury M, Teevan J, Bulik CM, Levinson CA, et al. Facebook use and disordered eating in college-aged women. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(2):157–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Burnette CB, Kwitowski MA, Mazzeo SE. “I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media”: a qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image. 2017;23:114–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liechty T, Coyne SM, Collier KM, Sharp AD. "It's just not very realistic": perceptions of media among pregnant and postpartum women. Health Commun. 2018;33(7):851–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brown Z, Tiggemann M. Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: effect on women's mood and body image. Body Image. 2016;19:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cohen R, Blaszczynski A. Comparative effects of Facebook and conventional media on body image dissatisfaction. J Eat Disord. 2015;3:23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    • Tamplin NC, McLean SA, Paxton SJ. Social media literacy protects against the negative impact of exposure to appearance ideal social media images in young adult women but not men. Body Image. 2018;26:29–37 This recent laboratory-based experimental study contributes to the emerging evidence for a protecting role of commercial social media literacy on the adverse effects of exposure to gender-matched appearance-ideal images on Instagram on body satisfaction in young women. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tiggemann M, Slater A. NetGirls: the Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46(6):630–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tiggemann M, Slater A. Facebook and body image concern in adolescent girls: a prospective study. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(1):80–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tiggemann M, Zaccardo M. “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: the effect of fitspiration imagery on women's body image. Body Image. 2015;15:61–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cohen R, Newton-John T, Slater A. The relationship between Facebook and Instagram appearance-focused activities and body image concerns in young women. Body Image. 2017;23:183–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Negative comparisons about one's appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image. 2015;12:82–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Holland G, Tiggemann M. “Strong beats skinny every time”: disordered eating and compulsive exercise in women who post fitspiration on Instagram. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(1):76–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McLean SA, Paxton SJ, Wertheim EH, Masters J. Photoshopping the selfie: self photo editing and photo investment are associated with body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48(8):1132–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mingoia J, Hutchinson AD, Gleaves DH, Corsini N, Wilson C. Use of social networking sites and associations with skin tone dissatisfaction, sun exposure, and sun protection in a sample of Australian adolescents. Psychol Health. 2017;32(12):1502–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    • Mingoia J, Hutchinson AD, Wilson C, Gleaves DH. The relationship between social networking site use and the internalization of a thin ideal in females: a meta-analytic review. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1351 This is a recent meta-analysis summarizing the findings from six experimental studies and correlational studies conducted among 1,829 adolescent girls and adult women which measured the relationship between using social networking sites (SNSs) and internalization of thin ideals. The results revealed that using SNSs positively correlated with internalization. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fardouly J, Diedrichs PC, Vartanian LR, Halliwell E. Social comparisons on social media: the impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image. 2015;13:38–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Slater A, Varsani N, Diedrichs PC. #fitspo or #loveyourself? The impact of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram images on women’s body image, self-compassion, and mood. Body Image. 2017;22:87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP, Hamilton HA. Use of social networking sites and perception and intentions regarding body weight among adolescents. Obes Sci Pract. 2016;2(1):32–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Veldhuis J, Konijn EA, Seidell JC. Negotiated media effects. Peer feedback modifies effects of media’s thin-body ideal on adolescent girls. Appetite. 2014;73:172–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lunde C. Acceptance of cosmetic surgery, body appreciation, body ideal internalization, and fashion blog reading among late adolescents in Sweden. Body Image. 2013;10(4):632–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kaewpradub N, Kiatrungrit K, Hongsanguansri S, Pavasuthipaisit C. Association among internet usage, body image and eating behaviors of secondary school students. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2017;29(4):208–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cash TF. Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) user’s manual 2000. Available from:
  71. 71.
    Cash TF, Labarge AS. Development of the appearance schemas inventory: a new cognitive body-image assessment. Cogn Ther Res. 1996;20(1):37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    da Silva WR, Dias JC, Maroco J, Campos JA. Confirmatory factor analysis of different versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire applied to Brazilian university students. Body Image. 2014;11(4):384–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Maiano C, Morin AJ, Lanfranchi MC, Therme P. The Eating Attitudes Test-26 revisited using exploratory structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(5):775–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Avalos L, Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow N. The Body Appreciation Scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image. 2005;2(3):285–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rangkakulnuwat P. Development of the body image self-schema scale and the body image possible selves scale for Thai middle-aged women. Chiangmai: Chiangmai University; 2006.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Petrie TA, Tripp MM, Harvey P. Factorial and construct validity of the Body Parts Satisfaction Scale-Revised: an examination of minority and nonminority women. Psychol Women Q. 2002;26(3):213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess. 2001;76(1):90–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Evans C, Dolan B. Body Shape Questionnaire: derivation of shortened “alternate forms”. Int J Eat Disord. 1993;13(3):315–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Polivy J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord. 1983;2(2):15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cash TF. Body image. In: A IK, editor. The encyclopedia of psychology: Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press; 2000. p. p. 436–9.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dittmar H, Beattie J, Friese S. Objects, decision considerations and self-image in men’s and women’s impulse purchases. Acta Psychol. 1996;93(1–3):187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Halliwell E, Dittmar H. Associations between appearance-related self-discrepancies and young women’s and men’s affect, body satisfaction, and emotional eating: a comparison of fixed-item and participant-generated self-discrepancies. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;32(4):447–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tripp MM, Petrie TA. Sexual abuse and eating disorders: a test of a conceptual model. Sex Roles. 2001;44(1):17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    McKinley NM, Hyde JS. The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale development and validation. Psychol Women Q. 1996;20(2):181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lindberg SM, Hyde JS, McKinley NM. A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30(1):65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Noll SM, Fredrickson BL. A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychol Women Q. 1998;22(4):623–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Heinberg LJ, Thompson JK, Stormer S. Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;17(1):81–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Keery H, Shroff H, Thompson JK, Wertheim E, Smolak L. The Sociocultural Internalization of Appearance Questionnaire—Adolescents (SIAQ-A): psychometric analysis and normative data for three countries. Eat Weight Disord. 2004;9(1):56–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Thompson JK, van den Berg P, Roehrig M, Guarda AS, Heinberg LJ. The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale-3 (SATAQ-3): development and validation. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35(3):293–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schaefer LM, Burke NL, Thompson JK, Dedrick RF, Heinberg LJ, Calogero RM, et al. Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4). Psychol Assess. 2015;27(1):54–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    McCreary DR, Sasse DK. An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. J Am Coll Heal. 2000;48(6):297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bessenoff GR. Can the media affect us? Social comparison, self-discrepancy, and the thin ideal. Psychol Women Q. 2006;30(3):239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Thompson JK, Heinberg L, Tantleff S. The Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (PACS). Behav Ther. 1991;14(174).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Tiggemann M, McGill B. The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women's mood and body dissatisfaction. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2004;23(1):23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    O'Brien KS, Caputi P, Minto R, Peoples G, Hooper C, Kell S, et al. Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body Image. 2009;6(3):201–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schaefer LM, Thompson JK. The development and validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised (PACS-R). Eat Behav. 2014;15(2):209–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Thompson JK, Heinberg L, Tantleff S. The Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (PACS). Behav Ther. 1991;14(174).Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109(2):186–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hausenblas HA, Campbell A, Menzel JE, Doughty J, Levine M, Thompson JK. Media effects of experimental presentation of the ideal physique on eating disorder symptoms: a meta-analysis of laboratory studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(1):168–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Thoman E, Jolls T. Literacy for the 21st century: an overview & orientation guide to media literacy education 2003. Available from:
  101. 101.
    Carrotte ER, Prichard I, Lim MS. “Fitspiration” on Social Media: a content analysis of gendered images. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(3):e95.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bacon L, Stern JS, Van Loan MD, Keim NL. Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, female chronic dieters. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(6):929–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Dalen J, Smith BW, Shelley BM, Sloan AL, Leahigh L, Begay D. Pilot study: Mindful Eating and Living (MEAL): weight, eating behavior, and psychological outcomes associated with a mindfulness-based intervention for people with obesity. Complement Ther Med. 2010;18(6):260–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Schaefer JT, Magnuson AB. A review of interventions that promote eating by internal cues. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(5):734–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, School of Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture and Food SciencesUniversité LavalQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Université Laval, Pavillon des servicesQuebec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations