Reduced Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation
- 4 Downloads
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are often reduced in older adults based on age, renal function, and bleeding risk. This review assesses recent evidence for safety and efficacy of reduced dose DOAC regimens in older adults.
Recent Findings
Dabigatran 110 mg twice daily shows similar efficacy and similar or lower bleeding risk compared to 150 mg twice daily in several studies. Dabigatran 110 mg is approved outside the USA and can be considered in ages > 75–80, or in patients with a propensity for higher dabigatran blood levels. Rivaroxaban 15 mg, apixaban 2.5 mg, and edoxaban 30 mg are safe and effective when used appropriately in patients who qualify based on labeled dosing. Limited evidence suggests inappropriately dose-reduced DOACs may increase risk for thromboembolic events.
Summary
Besides dabigatran, dose reduction of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban should be limited to patients who qualify based on FDA-approved parameters. The risk of stroke and bleeding should be carefully considered and discussed with each patient when deciding whether to reduce a DOAC dose off-label.
Keywords
Direct oral anticoagulant Elderly Low dose Reduced doseNotes
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Silu Zuo, Billy Chen, Akash Kataruka, and Sean Bell declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;369(22):2093–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2246–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.• Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K, et al (2018) Frequency and outcomes of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants: results from ORBIT-AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II). J Am Heart Assoc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007633. This study assesses the factors leading why DOACs are dose-reduced, and suggests reasons for dose reduction are not always expected (lower doses seen more in younger patients with lower bleed risk).
- 8.• Nielsen PB, Skjøth F, Søgaard M, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GYH, Larsen TB (2017) Effectiveness and safety of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ 356:j510. This is the only study to date to assess the effectiveness and safety of common reduced-dose regimens of DOACs.Google Scholar
- 9.Wang X, Tirucherai G, Marbury TC, Wang J, Chang M, Zhang D, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56:628–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pradaxa® package insert. Accessed Oct 13 2018. https://docs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf.
- 11.Pradaxa Canada Monograph. Accessed 13 Oct 2018. https://www.boehringer-ingelheim.ca/sites/ca/files/documents/pradaxapmen.pdf.
- 12.Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz M, Healey JS, Oldgren J, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2011;123:2363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Hart RG, Wallentin L, Reilly P, Oldgren J, et al. Balancing the benefits and risks of 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:900–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lauw MN, Eikelboom JW, Coppens M, Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz M, et al. Effects of dabigatran according to age in atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2017;103:1015–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ezekowitz MD, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Reilly PA, Brueckmann M, Kent AP, et al. Long-term evaluation of dabigatran 150 vs. 110 mg twice a day in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016;18:973–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bundhun PK, Chaudhary N, Yuan J. Bleeding events associated with a low dose (110 mg) versus a high dose (150 mg) of dabigatran in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17:83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom JW, et al. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Šinigoj P, Malmström RE, Vene N, Rönquist-Nii Y, Božič-Mijovski M, Pohanka A, et al. Dabigatran concentration: variability and potential bleeding prediction in “real-life” patients with atrial fibrillation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;117:323–9.Google Scholar
- 19.Cohen D. Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses. BMJ. 2014;349:g4670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Wojdyla DM, Piccini JP, Lokhnygina Y, Patel MR, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Circulation. 2014;130(2):138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, Diener HC, Hart R, Golitsyn S, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:806–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1330–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Pattullo CS, Barras M, Tai B, McKean M, Donovan P. New oral anticoagulants: appropriateness of prescribing in real-world setting. Intern Med J. 2016;46:812–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Barra ME, Fanikos J, Connors JM, Sylvester KW, Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Evaluation of dose-reduced direct oral anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med. 2016;129:1198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Alexander JH, Andersson U, Lopes RD, Hijazi Z, Hohnloser SH, Ezekowitz JA, et al. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced age, low body weight, or high creatinine: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:673–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Morrow DA, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, et al. Association between edoxaban dose, concentration, anti-factor Xa activity, and outcomes: an analysis of data from the randomised, double-blind ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2288–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kato ET, Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of edoxaban in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 20;5(5)Google Scholar
- 28.Sen S, Dahlberg KW. Physician’s fear of anticoagulant therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Med Sci. 2014;348(6):513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Rosenman MB, Baker L, Jing Y, Makenbaeva D, Meissner B, Simon TA, et al. Why is warfarin underused for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation? A detailed review of electronic medical records. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(9):1407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Man-Son-Hing M, Nichol G, Lau A, Laupacis A. Choosing antithrombotic therapy for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for falls. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(7):677–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Batey M, Hecht J, Callahan C, Wahl W. Direct oral anticoagulants do not worsen traumatic brain injury after low-level falls in the elderly. Surgery. 2018;164:814–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Feeney JM, Santone E, Difiori M, Kis L, Jayaraman V, Montgomery SC. Compared to warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants are associated with lower mortality in patients with blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a TQIP study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81:843–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang Y, Hendriksen S, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Sharma M, Cornelius VR, Patel JP, Davies JG, Molokhia M. Efficacy and harms of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2015;132:194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar