Advertisement

Quantification of the secondary metabolites by HPTLC, analgesic and antipyretic activity evaluation of Ficus racemosa L. leaves

  • Amit Kumar
  • Amrita Mishra
  • Arun Kumar Mishra
  • Harpreet Singh
Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

There have been no reports of simultaneous quantification of kaempferol and quercetin in Ficus racemosa L. Objective of the present work included to perform extraction using petroleum ether (PEE) and ethanol (EE), to perform preliminary phytochemical test, quantitative estimation of phytochemicals and simultaneous estimation of kaempferol and quercetin in Ficus racemosa L. using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method and to assess the analgesic and antipyretic activity of the extracts. PEE and EE obtained from cold maceration technique. Extracts were subjected to qualitative test and estimated quantitatively. Extracts were applied on silica gel G 60 F254 plate; solvent-Toluene: Chloroform: Acetone 4.5:4.5:1 (v/v) and scanned at 254 nm. The extracts were also subjected to analgesic activity (hot plate method and tail immersion method) and antipyretic (Brewer’s yeast induced pyrexia model and Lipopolysaccharide induced pyrexia mode) activity. Findings of preliminary phytochemical test and quantitative estimation of phytochemicals confirms the presence of flavonoids in both the extracts (PEE and EE). The amount of flavonoids in PEE and EE were found to be 24.58 ± 0.60 mg/100 g and 21.01 ± 0.58 mg/100 g respectively. HPTLC system resulted well resolved bands for quercetin (Rf 0.38) and kaempferol (Rf 0.55). The validated HPTLC method was found suitable for kaempferol and quercetin quantification in Ficus racemosa L. Hot plate reaction time response was improved in a dose-dependent manner in a group of rats treated with PEE suggesting its analgesic potential. In view of analgesic potential by tail immersion method, PEE (400 mg/kg b.w.) showed no significant difference in tail flick reaction time as shown by standard treated animal (Aspirin 100 mg/kg b.w.). The findings of antipyretic activity suggested that PEE (400 mg/kg b.w.) have no significant difference in treating pyrexia when compared with Paracetamol (100 mg/kg). PEE (400 mg/kg b.w.) was found to be most potent. It may be due to the presence of comparatively high amount of flavonoids in PEE confirmed by the preliminary phytochemical test, quantitative estimation of phytochemicals and HPTLC quantification the PEE was found to be more effective when compared to EE.

Keywords

Kaempferol Quercetin Lipopolysaccharide HPTLC quantification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Administration of IFTM University, Moradabad for the admirable assistance and motivation to complete the lab work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

The experimental protocols were approved (Ref 2016/839/ac/MPH/31) by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) constituted under Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA-837/ac/2004) guidelines.

Conflict of interest

This manuscript described has not been published before; not under consideration for publication anywhere else; and has been approved by all co-author.

References

  1. Akapa TC, Kehinde AO, Beatrice OO, Olajide OJ (2014) Antipyretic activity of Abutilon mauritianum (Jacq.) roots in Wistar rats. Int J Pharm Sci Res 5(2):42–45Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1952) The wealth of India. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  3. Anuj KM, Mohd K, Sanjaya KP (2010) Evaluation of analgesic activity of methanolic extract of Trapa natans l.var. Bispinosa roxb. roots. J Curr Pharmaceut Res 1:8–11Google Scholar
  4. Chopra RX, Chopra IC, Handa KL, Kapur LD (1958a) Indigenous drugs of India, 2nd edn. Academic Publisher, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra RN, Chopra IC, Handa KL, Kapur LD (1958b) Indigenous drugs of India, 2nd edn. Academic Publisher, Calcutta, p 674Google Scholar
  6. Ezeonu CS, Ejikeme CM (2016) Qualitative and quantitative determination of phytochemical contents of indigenous Nigerian softwoods. New J Sci Article ID 5601327: 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ezuruike UF, Prieto JM (2014) The use of plants in the traditional management of diabetes in Nigeria: pharmacological and toxicological considerations. J Ethnopharm 155:857–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geetha TS, Geetha N (2014) Quantitative analysis of primary and secondary metabolites of Cymbopogan citratus (DC) stapf. leaves from Kodaikanal hills, Tamil nadu. Int J PharmTech Res 6(2):521–529Google Scholar
  9. Harborne JB (1973) Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, pp 309–316Google Scholar
  10. Headley PM, Shaughnessy CT (1985) Evidence for opiate and dopamine interaction in striatum. Br J Pharmacol 86:700Google Scholar
  11. ICH (2005) Q2A. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. International conference on harmonization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  12. Idu M, Oghale OU (2016) Phytochemistry, anti-asthmatic and antioxidant activities of Anchomanes difformis (Blume) Engl. leaf extract. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6(3):225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamboj A, Saluja AK (2017) Development of validated HPTLC method for quantification of stigmasterol from leaf and stem of Bryophyllum pinnatum. Arab J Chem 10:S2644–S2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keshari AK, Kumar G, Kushwaha PS, Bhardwaj M, Kumar P, Rawat A, Kumar D, Prakash A, Ghosh B, Saha S (2016) Isolated flavonoids from Ficus racemosa stem bark possess antidiabetic, hypolipidemic and protective effects in albino Wistar rats. J Ethnopharm 181:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirtikar KR, Basu BD (1975) Indian medicinal plants. International Book Distributers, Dehradun, pp 2327–2328Google Scholar
  16. Mukherjee D, Kumar NS, Khatua T, Mukherjee PK (2010) Rapid validated method for estimation of betulinic acid in Nelumbo nucifera (Nymphacaeae). Phytochem Anal 21(6):556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadkarni KM, Nadkarni AK, Chopra RN (1996) India Materia Medica. Popular Prakashan, Bombay, pp 548–550Google Scholar
  18. Nahapetian A, Bassiri A (1975) Changes in concentrations and interrelationships of phytate, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and zinc in wheat during maturation. J Agric Food Chem 3:1179–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD Guidance document on acute oral toxicity 420, NO. 24. Environmental health and safety monograph series on testing assessment (2000) 21: 155–159Google Scholar
  20. Pandeya DK, Radha Dey A (2016) A validated and densitometric HPTLC method for the simultaneous quantification of reserpine and ajmalicine in Rauvolfia serpentina and Rauvolfia tetraphylla. Rev Bras de Farmacog 26:553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piao G, Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L (2016) The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules 21(559):1–18Google Scholar
  22. Pinardi G, Sierralta F, Miranda HF (2003) Atropine reverses the antinociception of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the tail-flick test of mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74:603–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raj SJ, Joseph B (2010) Phytopharmacological and phytochemical properties of three Ficus species—an overview. Int J Pharm Biol Sci 1(4):246–253Google Scholar
  24. Rajani GP, Gupta D, Sowjanya K, Sahithi B (2011) Screening of antipyretic activity of aerial parts of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. in yeast induced pyrexia. Pharmacologyonline 1:1120–1124Google Scholar
  25. Saini NK, Singha M (2012) Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity of methanolic Tecomaria capensis leaves extract. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2(11):870–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Santhi K, Sengottuvel R (2016) Qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analysis of Moringa concanensis Nimmo. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5(1):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shah MB, Patel AA, Amin AA, Patwari AH (2017) Validated high performance thin layer chromatography method for simultaneous determination of quercetin and gallic acid in Leea indica. Rev Bras de Farmacog 27:50–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shakya AK (2016) Medicinal plants: future source of new drugs. Int J Herb Med 4(4):59–64Google Scholar
  29. Sharma P (2001) DravyaGuna-Vigyan (Aubhid Ausadh –Dravya). Chaukhambha Bhartiya Academy, Varanasi, pp 80–83Google Scholar
  30. Ekanayake DT. Sri Lanka Forest (1980) 14(1,4):145–152Google Scholar
  31. Tejavathi DH, Jayashree DR (2013) Phytochemical screening of selected medicinal herbs inoculated with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Pharm Biol All Sci 2(11):2090–2106Google Scholar
  32. Tomazetti J, Avila DS, Ferreira AP (2005) GC–MS analysis of bioactive compounds in Psidium guajava leaves. J Neurosci Methods 147(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trease GE, Evans WC (2002) Pharmacognosy, 15th edn. Saunders Publishers, London, pp 393–399Google Scholar
  34. Vogel GH, Vogel WH (1997) Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activity. In: Drug discovery and evaluation. Pharmacol ass. Springer, Berlin, pp 360–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wigdor S, Wilcox GL (1987) Central and systemic morphine-induced antinociception in mice: of contribution descending serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 242:90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Woolfe G, MacDonald AD (1944) The evaluation of the analgesic action of pethidine hydrochloride (DEMEROL). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 80:300–307Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Kumar
    • 1
  • Amrita Mishra
    • 1
  • Arun Kumar Mishra
    • 1
  • Harpreet Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Facility of Instrumentation, School of Pharmaceutical SciencesIFTM UniversityMoradabadIndia

Personalised recommendations