Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, 76:97 | Cite as

Phosphorus availability in relation to soil properties and forest productivity in Pinus sylvestris L. plantations

  • Teresa BueisEmail author
  • Felipe Bravo
  • Valentín Pando
  • Yaovi-Abel Kissi
  • María-Belén Turrión
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Mediterranean Pines

Abstract

Key message

Pinus sylvestris L. productivity in Spanish plantations is driven by P availability, which, in turn, is determined by the activity of soil microorganisms, responsible for inorganic P solubilization; Fe and Al contents, responsible for P retention; and organic matter, which is source of organic P, inhibits its precipitation as insoluble compounds, and reduces P retention.

Context

Phosphorus is often a limiting nutrient in forest ecosystems mainly due to the low solubility of P compounds and the sorption processes occurring in soils.

Aims

The main aims of this work were to evaluate soil P availability, to assess which soil properties are driving P availability, and to study whether soil P availability is determining forest productivity in Pinus sylvestris L. plantations in Northern Spain.

Methods

Soil properties and forest productivity were studied in 34 plots located in monospecific P. sylvestris plantations. Tiessen and Moir (Canadian Society of Soil Science 75–86, 1993) sequential fractionation method was carried out to determine different forms of soil P and to provide a comprehensive assessment of available P in soils. To explore the relationships between these variables, canonical correlation analyses and Pearson’s correlations were studied.

Results

Significant correlations were found between P fractions and soil properties related to Fe and Al contents, organic matter, and microbial biomass. Besides, significant correlations were found between site index and the studied P fractions except for P extracted with anion exchange membrane (PAEM) and the recalcitrant P fraction.

Conclusion

In the studied soils, P availability is low and the predominant fractions of P are the recalcitrant forms. Aluminum and iron contents in the soils studied play an important role in sorption processes related to the highly and moderately labile P fractions and the organic phosphorus. P availability seems to be regulated by both processes: biochemical mineralization, where phosphatase activity is relevant, and biological mineralization of the soil organic matter. Phosphorus availability affects forest productivity in the Pinus sylvestris plantations studied.

Keywords

Site index Phosphorus fractionation Sequential extraction Labile phosphorus Recalcitrant phosphorus Microbial biomass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Elisa Mellado, Temesgen Desalegn, Olga López, and Carlos Alejandro Mendoza for their assistance in the field work; to Carmen Blanco and Juan Carlos Arranz for their advice in laboratory analysis; and to Adele Muscolo for her support in phosphatase activity determination.

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government (AGL2011-29701-C02-02, AGL2014-51964-C2-1-R), the University of Valladolid and Banco Santander (predoctoral grant to T. BUEIS), and the Mediterranean Regional Office of the European Forest Institute (EFIMED; “Short Scientific Visit” grant to T. BUEIS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Achat DL, Bakker MR, Zeller B, Pellerin S, Bienaime S, Morel C (2010) Long-term organic phosphorus mineralization in Spodosols under forests and its relation to carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1479–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bascomb CL (1964) Rapid method for the determination of cation exchange capacity of calcareous and non-calcareous soils. J Sci Food Agric 15:821–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bascomb CL (1968) Distribution of pyrophosphate-extractable iron and organic carbon in soils of various groups. J Soil Sci 19:251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertsch PM, Bloom PR (1996) Aluminum. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 3—chemical methods. vol methodsofsoilan3. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin (USA), pp 517–550Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK (1987) Methods for chemical analysis of soils. NZ Soil Bureau Scientific Report 80:71–76Google Scholar
  8. Bueis T, Bravo F, Pando V, Turrión MB (2016) Relationship between environmental parameters and Pinus sylvestris L. site index in forest plantations in northern Spain acidic plateau. iForest 9:394–401.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1600-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bueis T, Bravo F, Pando V, Kissi YA, Turrión MB (2018a) Phosphorus fractions and related properties in soils under Pinus sylvestris L. plantations in Spain. V1. Zenodo. [Dataset].  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1560581
  10. Bueis T, Turrión M-B, Bravo F, Pando V, Muscolo A (2018b) Factors determining enzyme activities in soils under Pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris plantations in Spain: a basis for establishing sustainable forest management strategies. Ann For Sci 75:34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0720-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bueis T, Turrión MB, Bravo F (2019) Stand and environmental data from Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus sylvestris L. plantations in Spain. Annals of Forest Science (accepted).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0810-6
  12. Cerny BA, Kaiser HF (1977) Study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behav Res 12:43–47.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen CR, Condron LM, Xu ZH (2008) Impacts of grassland afforestation with coniferous trees on soil phosphorus dynamics and associated microbial processes: a review. Forest Ecol Manag 255:396–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cross AF, Schlesinger WH (1995) A literature-review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation—applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil-phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64:197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00023-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. da Silva EP, Ferreira PAA, Furtini-Neto AE, Soares C (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphate on growth of Australian red cedar seedlings. Cienc Florest 27:1269–1281.  https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509830320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desai S, Naik D, Cumming JR (2014) The influence of phosphorus availability and Laccaria bicolor symbiosis on phosphate acquisition, antioxidant enzyme activity, and rhizospheric carbon flux in Populus tremuloides. Mycorrhiza 24:369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0548-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Earl KD, Syers JK, McLaughlin JR (1979) Origin of the effect of citrate, tartrate and acetate on phosphate sorption by soils and synthetic gels. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:674–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González I, Déjean S (2012) CCA: canonical correlation analysis. R package version 1.2Google Scholar
  19. Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:47–63.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009823600950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in organic and inorganic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600050017x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrero C, Turrión MB, Pando V, Bravo F (2016) Carbon content of forest floor and mineral soil in Mediterranean Pinus spp. and oak stands in acid soils in Northern Spain. Forest Systems 25(Issue 2):e065.  https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016252-09149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hou EQ, Chen CR, Wen DZ, Liu X (2014) Relationships of phosphorus fractions to organic carbon content in surface soils in mature subtropical forests, Dinghushan, China. Soil Res 52:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsu PH (1989) Aluminum oxides and oxyhidroxides. In: Dixon JB, Weed SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 99–143Google Scholar
  24. IGME (1975) Mapa Geológico de España. Escala 1/50 000. Instituto Geológico y Minero de EspañaGoogle Scholar
  25. Isermeyer H (1952) Eine einfache Methode sur Bestimmung der Bodenatmung und der Carbonate im Boden. Zeitschrift Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 56:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soils: measurement and turnover. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 5. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 415–417Google Scholar
  27. Lajtha K, Driscoll CT, Jarrell WM, Elliott ET (1999) Soil phosphorus: characterization and total element analysis. In: Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 115–142Google Scholar
  28. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. McGill WB, Cole CV (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-706181900240
  30. Menzel U (2012) CCP: significance tests for canonical correlation analysis (CCA). R package version 1.1Google Scholar
  31. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphorus in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88444-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  33. Palahi M, Tome M, Pukkala T, Trasobares A, Montero G (2004) Site index model for Pinus sylvestris in north-east Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 187:35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00312-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Revelle W (2018) psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. R package version 1.8.12Google Scholar
  35. Richter DD, Allen HL, Li JW, Markewitz D, Raikes J (2006) Bioavailability of slowly cycling soil phosphorus: major restructuring of soil P fractions over four decades in an aggrading forest. Oecologia 150:259–271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0510-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Río M, López E, Montero G (2006) Manual de gestión para masas procedentes de repoblación de Pinus pinaster Ait., Pinus sylvestris L. y Pinus nigra Arn. Consejería de Medio Ambiente. Junta de Castilla y León, Castilla y León. SpainGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoenau JJ, Stewart JWB, Bettany JR (1989) Forms and cycling of phosphorus in prairie and boreal forest soils. Biogeochemistry 8:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoenau JJ, Huang WZ (1991) Anion-exchange membrane, water and sodium bicarbonate extractions as soil tests for phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 22: 465-492.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629109368432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schollenberger CJ, Simon RH (1945) Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soil—ammonium acetate method. Soil Sci 59:13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Serrada R, González GM, Reque JA (2008) Compendio de Selvicultura aplicada en España. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2:587–600.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, Zhang W, Zhang F (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol 156:997–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175232 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Skovsgaard JP, Vanclay JK (2008) Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands. Forestry 81:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slazak A, Freese D, Matos ED, Huttl RF (2010) Soil organic phosphorus fraction in pine-oak forest stands in Northeastern Germany. Geoderma 158:156–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil BiolBiochem 1:30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-11–307
  46. TeamR RC (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  47. Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis publishers, Boca Raton, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  48. Tiessen H, Stewart JWB, Cole CV (1984) Pathways of phosphorus transformations in soils of differing pedogenesis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trasar-Cepeda MC, Gil-Sotres F (1987) Phosphatase activity in acid high organic matter soils in Galicia (NW Spain). Soil Biol Biochem 19:281–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Troeh FR, Thompson LM (1993) Soils and soil fertility, Fifth edn. Oxford University Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Turrión MB, Gallardo JF, Gonzalez MI (2000a) Distribution of P forms in natural and fertilized forest soils of the central western Spain: plant response to superphosphate fertilization. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 14:159–173.  https://doi.org/10.1080/089030600263085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turrión MB, Glaser B, Solomon D, Ni A, Zech W (2000b) Effects of deforestation on phosphorus pools in mountain soils of the Alay Range, Khyrgyzia. Biol Fertil Soils 31:134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turrión M-B, Lopez O, Lafuente F, Mulas R, Ruiperez C, Puyo A (2007) Soil phosphorus forms as quality indicators of soils under different vegetation covers. Sci Total Environ 378:195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciotenv.2007.01.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Turrión M-B, Schneider K, Gallardo JF (2008) Soil P availability along a catena located at the Sierra de Gata Mountains, Western Central Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 255:3254–3262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass-C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitousek PM (1984) Literfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forest. Ecol Lett 65:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29:677–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang X, Post WM (2011) Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: a synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method. Biogeosciences 8:2907–2916.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zamuner EC, Picone LI, Echeverria HE (2008) Organic and inorganic phosphorus in Mollisol soil under different tillage practices. Soil Tillage Res 99:131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Forest Management Research InstituteUniversity of Valladolid & INIAPalenciaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales. E.T.S. Ingenierías AgrariasUniversidad de ValladolidPalenciaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Producción Vegetal y Recursos Forestales, E.T.S. Ingenierías AgrariasUniversidad de ValladolidPalenciaSpain
  4. 4.Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, E.T.S. Ingenierías AgrariasUniversidad de ValladolidPalenciaSpain
  5. 5.Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do SulDouradosBrazil

Personalised recommendations