A general method for the classification of forest stands using species composition and vertical and horizontal structure
We present a novel approach to define pure- and mixed-forest typologies from the comparison of pairs of forest plots in terms of species identity, diameter, and height of their trees.
Forest typologies are useful for many purposes, including forest mapping, assessing habitat quality, studying forest dynamics, or defining sustainable management strategies. Quantitative typologies meant for forestry applications normally focus on horizontal and vertical structure of forest plots as main classification criteria, with species composition often playing a secondary role. The selection of relevant variables is often idiosyncratic and influenced by a priori expectations of the forest types to be distinguished.
We present a general framework to define forest typologies where the dissimilarity between forest stands is assessed using coefficients that integrate the information of species composition with the univariate distribution of tree diameters or heights or the bivariate distribution of tree diameters and heights.
We illustrate our proposal with the classification of forest inventory plots in Catalonia (NE Spain), comparing the results obtained using the bivariate distribution of diameters and heights to those obtained using either tree heights or tree diameters only.
The number of subtypes obtained using the tree diameter distribution for the calculation of dissimilarity was often the same as those obtained from the tree height distribution or to those using the bivariate distribution. However, classifications obtained using the three approaches were often different in terms of forest plot membership.
The proposed classification framework is particularly suited to define forest typologies from forest inventory data and allows taking advantage of the bivariate distribution of diameters and heights if both variables are measured. It can provide support to the development of typologies in situations where fine-scale variability of topographic, climatic, and legacy management factors leads to fine-scale variation in forest structure and composition, including uneven-aged and mixed stands.
KeywordsDissimilarity coefficients Forest plot Forest typology Mixed forests Stand structure
The authors would like to thank Mario Beltrán (CTFC) for useful discussions around the method and its potential applications.
The study was supported by projects 979S/2013 (Autonomous Agency of National Parks, Spanish Ministry of Agriculture Food and Environment) and a Spanish “Ramon y Cajal” fellowship to M.D.C (RYC-2012-11109).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bottalico F, Travaglini D, Chirici G, Marchetti M, Marchi E, Nocentini S, Corona P (2014) Classifying silvicultural systems (coppices vs. high forests) in mediterranean oak forests by airborne laser scanning data. Eur J Remote Sens 47:437–460. https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20144725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bravo-Oviedo A, Pretzsch H, Ammer C, Andenmatten E, Barbati A, Barreiro S, Brang P, Bravo F, Coll L, Corona P, den Ouden J, Ducey MJ, Forrester DI, Giergiczny M, Jacobsen JB, Lesinski J, Löf M, Mason WL, Matovic B, Metslaid M, Morneau F, Motiejunaite J, O'Reilly C, Pach M, Ponette Q, del Rio M, Short I, Skovsgaard JP, Soliño M, Spathelf P, Sterba H, Stojanovic D, Strelcova K, Svoboda M, Verheyen K, von Lüpke N, Zlatanov T (2014) European mixed forests: definition and research perspectives. For Syst 23:518–533. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014233-06256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cajander AK (1949) Forest types and their significance. Acta For Fenn 56:1–71Google Scholar
- Casals P, Camprodon J, Caritat A, Rios AI, Guixé D, Garcia-Marti X, Martín-Alcón S, Coll L (2015) Forest structure of mediterranean yew (Taxus baccata L.) populations and neighbor effects on juvenile yew performance in the NE Iberian Peninsula. For Syst 24:e042. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015243-07469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Cáceres M, Coll L, Legendre P et al (2019) Trajectory analysis in community ecology. Ecol Monogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1350
- DGCN (2005) Tercer Inventario Forestal Nacional (1997–2007): Catalunya. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, MadridGoogle Scholar
- Faith D, Austin M, Belbin L, Margules C (1985) Numerical classification of profile attributes in environmental studies. J Environ Manag 20:73–85Google Scholar
- Forest Europe, UNECE and FAO (2011) State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. pp 344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
- Godinho-Ferreira P, Azevedo A, Rego F (2005) Carta da Tipologia Florestal de Portugal Continental. Silva Lusit 13:1–34Google Scholar
- Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical Ecology, 3rd Eng. Elsevier Science BV, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- McComb W, Lindenmayer D (1999) Dying, dead, and down trees. In: Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Hunter, M. L. (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–372Google Scholar
- Ngo Bieng MA, Ginisty C, Goreaud F, Perot T (2006) First typology of oak and scots pine mixed stands in Orléans Forest (France), based on the canopy spatial structure. New Zeal J For Sci 36:325–346Google Scholar
- O’Hara KL, Latham PA, Hessburg P, Smith BG (1996) A structural classification for inland northwest forest vegetation. West J Appl For 11:97–102Google Scholar
- Sánchez-Pinillos M, Leduc A, Ameztegui A, Kneeshaw D, Lloret F, Coll L (2019) Resistance, resilience, or change: post-disturbance dynamics of boreal forests after insect outbreaks. Ecosystems. In PressGoogle Scholar