Growth-mortality attributes and species composition determine carbon sequestration and dynamics of old stand types in the Acadian Forest of New Brunswick, Canada
We used 20 years of plot data to analyze the influence of tree growth-mortality balance and species mix on the potential of old stands to sequester carbon from the atmosphere and store carbon. The study indicated that carbon in hardwood-dominated stands increased with age, without any sign of decline in carbon sequestration. In contrast, balsam fir ( Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) dominated softwood stands showed a negative C change with a decline at 80 years of age.
Variation in species stand development, carbon (C) storage, and sequestration is fundamental to ascertain the role of old forests as sources and sinks in global C.
To analyze the effect of the balance between growth and mortality of species and hardwood-softwood mix on the C source and sink budget of old forest types in New Brunswick, Canada.
A set of 602 plots, representing 12 stand types, were grouped into softwood (SW), mixedwood (MW), and hardwood (HW) categories. Net C change per year, including growth, recruitment of trees, and mortality, was calculated, and plots were categorized into three classes, of carbon sinks, sources, or neutral.
Over the period from 1987 to 2007, 68% of plots were C sinks, 25% were sources, and 7% were neutral. Balsam fir-spruce (Picea sp.) was the only stand type with negative mean C change at − 0.2 t C ha−1 yr−1. Long-term C projection using OSM (open stand model) determined that shade-tolerant hardwood and mixed stand types showed increases of 26–30% of total C over a 100-year simulation, whereas other stand types ranged between 7 and 21% increases.
Balsam fir-dominated stands incur high mortality rates due to shorter longevity (stand decline) and high susceptibility to insect and wind disturbances, and therefore, HW and non-balsam fir-dominated MW should have priority in management for longer rotations to maximize C onsite.
KeywordsPermanent sample plot Biomass Species mix Mortality Net carbon change Open stand model
We thank New Brunswick Department of Energy and Resource Development (formerly named Department of Natural Resources) for PSP database access and support.
DAM and AB conceived and designed the study; AB performed research; AB, DAM, and CRH analyzed data; and AB, DAM, and CRH wrote and revised the paper.
This work was supported by funding from a Community University Research Alliance project led by Dr. Don Floyd, with industry support from J.D. Irving, Limited.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baker TR, Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Almeida S, Arroyo L, Di Fiore A, Erwin T, Killeen TJ, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, Monteagudo A, Neill DA, Patino S, Pitman NCA, Silva JNM, Martinez MV (2004) Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Glob Change Biol 10:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown SL, Schroeder PE (1999) Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of woody biomass for eastern US forests. Ecol Appl 9:968–980Google Scholar
- Cai H, Di X, Chang SX, Wang C, Shi B, Geng P, Jin G (2015) Carbon storage, net primary production and net ecosystem production in four major temperate forest types in northeast China. Can J For Res 46:1–9Google Scholar
- Chapin FS, Woodwell GM, Randerson JT, Rastetter EB, Lovett GM, Baldocchi DD, Clark DA, Harmon ME, Schimel DS, Valentini R, Wirth C, Aber JD, Cole JJ, Goulden ML, Harden JW, Heimann M, Howarth RW, Matson PA, McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Neff JC, Houghton RA, Pace ML, Ryan MG, Running SW, Sala OE, Schlesinger WH, Schulze ED (2006) Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems 9:1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clement RJ, Moncrieff JB, Jarvis PG (2003) Net carbon productivity of Sitka spruce forest in Scotland. Scott For 57:5–10Google Scholar
- Harmon ME, Bible K, Ryan MG, Shaw DC, Chen H, Klopatek J, Li X (2004) Production, respiration, and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7:498–512Google Scholar
- Hennigar CR (2011) Open stand model, user guide, FORUS research. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada (http://www.forusresearch.com/index/). Accessed 20 June 2016
- Honer TG, Ker MF, Alemdag IS (1983) Metric timber tables for the commercial tree species of central and eastern Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. Information Report M-X-140, pp 1–139Google Scholar
- Jenkins J, Chojnacky D, Heath L, Birdsey R (2003) National scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35Google Scholar
- Ker M (1980) Tree biomass equations for ten major species in Cumberland County, Nova Scotia. Environment Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. Information Report M-X-108, pp 1–26Google Scholar
- Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, Mcclure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J For 106:115–171Google Scholar
- NBDNR (2003) Our landscape heritage: the story of ecological land classification in New Brunswick. The ecosystem classification working group. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, FrederictonGoogle Scholar
- Paw UKT, Falk M, Suchanek TH, Ustin SL, Chen J, Park YS, Winner WE, Thomas SC, Hsiao TC, Shaw RH, King TS, Pyles RD, Schroeder M, Matista AA (2004) Carbon dioxide exchange between an old-growth forest and the atmosphere. Ecosystems 7:513–524Google Scholar
- Porter KB, MacLean DA, Beaton KP, Upshall J (2001) New Brunswick permanent sample plot database (PSPDB v1. 0): user’s guide and analysis. Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, NB, Canada, Information Report M-X-209, pp 1–65Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J, Birdsey R, Cieszewski C (1997) Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. For Sci 43:424–434Google Scholar
- Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, Birdsey RA (2006) Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA, General Technical Report NE-323, pp 1–216Google Scholar
- Taylor SL, MacLean DA (2009) Legacy of insect defoliators: increased wind-related mortality two decades after a spruce budworm outbreak. For Sci 55:256–267Google Scholar
- Zhou X, Peng C, Dang QL, Chen J, Parton S (2004) Simulating forest growth and carbon dynamics of the Lake Abitibi Model Forest in northeastern Ontario. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario, Canada, Ontario Forest Research Institute, (OFRI-REP) 163Google Scholar