Advertisement

Inbreeding depression and differential maladaptation shape the fitness trajectory of two co-occurring Eucalyptus species

  • Henry NickolasEmail author
  • Peter A. Harrison
  • Paul Tilyard
  • René E. Vaillancourt
  • Brad M. Potts
Research Paper
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Key message

The fitness trajectory of long-lived forest species with mixed mating systems is shaped by a dynamic interplay between endogenous (inbreeding depression) and exogenous (environmental maladaptation) factors. Using two eucalypt species, we show that the timing and translation of inbreeding depression from growth to survival through size-dependent mortality may vary between species and may intensify under climate stress.

Context

Inbreeding is an important issue in evolutionary biology and breeding, as it can reduce genetic diversity and fitness and ultimately limit the adaptive response of populations to environmental stress. This is particularly relevant to forest tree species, such as eucalypts, which have a mixed mating system and long-generation intervals.

Aim

Examine the role of inbreeding depression on the fitness trajectory of two eucalypt species, Eucalyptus globulus and E. ovata.

Methods

Survival, growth, and reproduction of controlled-crossed self and outcross, as well as open-pollinated progeny of each species grown in a common garden field trial were assessed over a 28-year period and analysed using mixed effect models.

Results

Inbreeding depression resulted in the purging of inbred progeny through size-dependent mortality with the most death of inbreds occurring between 4 and 13 years. After this period, differential maladaptation of the species was the dominant cause of mortality, associated with a period of drought and high temperatures, and it was evident first in the selfed populations.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the dynamic nature of the selective process in purging inbred progeny from a population, with inbreeding depression the dominant factor early in stand development, leading to older stands being dominated by outcrosses.

Keywords

Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus ovata Mixed mating Drought Heat stress Selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the North Forest Products (and subsequently Gunns Limited and Forico Pty Limited) for the provision and maintenance of the trial site.

Contribution of the co-authors

Conceptualization: BMP, HN, and PAH; methodology and data analysis: HN, PAH, and BMP; data collection and curation: PT and HN; writing, reviewing, and editing: HN, PAH, REV, and BMP.

Funding information

The trial was established under an Australian Research Council (ARC) National Research Fellowship awarded to BMP. The final measurements and collation of data were undertaken as part of an ARC Linkage Grant LP140100506, which is obtained in partnership with the Southern Tree Breeding Association. HN acknowledges receipt of a Tasmania Graduate Research Scholarship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement on data availability

Trial data relating to this study are available at the University of Tasmania Open Access Repository (Nickolas et al. 2018). Dataset not peer-reviewed. [Dataset] https://eprints.utas.edu.au/28796/.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abram NJ, McGregor HV, Tierney JE, Evans MN, McKay NP, Kaufman DS, PAGES 2k Consortium (2016) Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature 536:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg ET (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderegg WR, Kane JM, Anderegg LD (2013) Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nat Clim Chang 3:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 10-5 http://CRANR-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 12 Oct 2017
  6. Bella I (1971) A new competition model for individual trees. For Sci 17:364–372Google Scholar
  7. Bertrand R, Riofrío-Dillon G, Lenoir J, Drapier J, De Ruffray P, Gégout JC, Loreau M (2016) Ecological constraints increase the climatic debt in forests. Nat Commun 7:12643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezemer N (2018) Wild seedlings of a tree endemic on granite outcrops show no evidence of inbreeding depression. Aust J Bot.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BT17175
  9. Bison O, Aguiar AM, Rezende G, Ramalho MAP (2004) Inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus clones. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 4:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth TH (2017) Going nowhere fast: a review of seed dispersal in eucalypts. Aust J Bot 65:401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BT17019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bush D, Thumma B (2013) Characterising a Eucalyptus cladocalyx breeding population using SNP markers. Tree Genet Genomes 9:741–752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0589-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambers P, Potts B, Borralho N (1996) Genetic analysis of survival in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet 45:107–112Google Scholar
  13. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Close DC (2012) A review of ecophysiologically-based seedling specifications for temperate Australian eucalypt plantations. New For 43:739–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9321-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook BI, Smerdon JE, Seager R, Coats S (2014) Global warming and 21st century drying. Clim Dyn 43:2607–2627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2075-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Potts BM (2010a) Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67:606p601–606p608.  https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Pires AM, Potts BM (2010b) Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67:605p601–605p609.  https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Potts BM (2011) The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 107:50–60.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.154 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Costa e Silva J, Potts BM, Gilmour AR, Kerr RJ (2017) Genetic-based interactions among tree neighbors: identification of the most influential neighbors, and estimation of correlations among direct and indirect genetic effects for leaf disease and growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 119:125–135.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2017.25 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Costa e Silva J, Potts BM, Lopez GA (2014) Heterosis may result in selection favouring the products of long-distance pollen dispersal in Eucalyptus. PLoS One 9:e93811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawley MJ (2012) The R book. Wiley, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson N, Reid J (1980) Comparison of the early growth characteristics of the Eucalyptus subgenera Monocalyptus and Symphyomyrtus. Aust J Bot 28:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davidson N, Reid J (1985) Frost as a factor influencing the growth and distribution of subalpine eucalypts. Aust J Bot 33:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davidson N, Reid J (1989) Response of eucalypt species to drought. Austral Ecol 14:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Florence RG (2004) Ecology and silviculture of eucalypt forests. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox CW, Reed DH (2011) Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65:246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González-Orozco CE, Pollock LJ, Thornhill AH, Mishler BD, Knerr N, Laffan SW, Miller JT, Rosauer DF, Faith DP, Nipperess DA (2016) Phylogenetic approaches reveal biodiversity threats under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:1110–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36:47–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossnickle SC (2012) Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New For 43:711–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton MG, M Acuna, JC Wiedemann, R Mitchell, DJ Pilbeam, MW Brown, BM Potts (2015) Genetic control of Eucalyptus globulus harvest traits. Can J For Res 45:615–624Google Scholar
  34. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hardner C, Tibbits W (1998) Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For Genet 5:11–20Google Scholar
  36. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1995) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet 44:46–54Google Scholar
  37. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1997) Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51:103–111.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2410964 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hardner CM, Potts BM, Gore PL (1998) The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52:614–618.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2411096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hardner CM, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (1996) Stand density influences outcrossing rate and growth of open-pollinated families of Eucalyptus globulus. Silvae Genet 45:226–228Google Scholar
  40. Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 120:1132–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1994)120:6(1132) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A (2016) Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 31:940–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hedrick PW, Hellsten U, Grattapaglia D (2016) Examining the cause of high inbreeding depression: analysis of whole-genome sequence data in 28 selfed progeny of Eucalyptus grandis. New Phytol 209:600–611.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13639 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hickey J, Kostoglou P, Sargison G (2000) Tasmania’s tallest trees. Tasforests 12:105–122Google Scholar
  44. Hodge GR, Volker PW, Potts BM, Owen JV (1996) A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor Appl Genet 92:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00222951 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Hothorn MT (2009) The multcomp package. Technical report 1.0-6. The R project for statistical computing, www.r-project.org, version 1.0.143. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
  46. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones DA, Wang W, Fawcett R (2009) High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia. Aust Meteorol Oceanogr J 58:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kardos M, Taylor HR, Ellegren H, Luikart G, Allendorf FW (2016) Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild. Evol Appl 9:1205–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12414 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Kärkkäinen K, Koski V, Savolainen O (1996) Geographical variation in the inbreeding depression of Scots pine. Evolution 50:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirkpatrick J, Marks F (1985) Observations on drought damage to some native plant species in eucalypt forests and woodlands near Hobart, Tasmania. In Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia, 199:15–21Google Scholar
  51. Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD (2004) The limits to tree height. Nature 428:851–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koelewijn HP, Koski V, Savolainen O (1999) Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Evolution 53:758–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2015) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  54. Leimu R, Vergeer P, Angeloni F, Ouborg N (2010) Habitat fragmentation, climate change, and inbreeding in plants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1195:84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lenoir J, Gegout JC, Marquet PA, de Ruffray P, Brisse H (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 320:1768–1771.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Levin DA (2011) Mating system shifts on the trailing edge. Ann Bot 109:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lonsdale W (1990) The self-thinning rule: dead or alive? Ecology 71:1373–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. López GA, Potts BM, Tilyard PA (2000) F1 hybrid inviability in Eucalyptus: the case of E. ovata × E. globulus. Heredity 85:242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00739.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. López GA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Apiolaza LA (2003) Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Can J For Res 33:2108–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Martinsen GD, Whitham TG, Turek RJ, Keim P (2001) Hybrid populations selectively filter gene introgression between species. Evolution 55:1325–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Matusick G, Ruthrof KX, Brouwers NC, Dell B, Hardy GSJ (2013) Sudden forest canopy collapse corresponding with extreme drought and heat in a Mediterranean-type eucalypt forest in southwestern Australia. Eur J Forest Res 132:497–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mimura M, Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Watanabe KN (2009) Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol Ecol 18:4180–4192.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04350.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Mitchell PJ, O'Grady AP, Hayes KR, Pinkard EA (2014) Exposure of trees to drought-induced die-off is defined by a common climatic threshold across different vegetation types. Ecol Evol 4:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nickolas H, Harrison PA, Tilyard P, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2018) Inbreeding Data AFS 10122018, University of Tasmania. [Dataset]. https://eprints.utas.edu.au/28796/
  65. Otieno DO, Schmidt MWT, Adiku S, Tenhunen J (2005) Physiological and morphological responses to water stress in two Acacia species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiol 25:361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.3.361 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Owens JN, Colangeli AM, Morris SJ (1990) The effect of self-, cross-, and no pollination on ovule, embryo, seed, and cone development in western red cedar (Thuja plicata). Can J For Res 20:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patterson B, Vaillancourt RE, Pilbeam DJ, Potts BM (2004) Factors affecting variation in outcrossing rate in Eucalyptus globulus. Aust J Bot 52:773–780.  https://doi.org/10.1071/bt03186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Petit RJ, Hampe A (2006) Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37:187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Phillips N, Ryan M, Bond B, McDowell N, Hinckley T, Čermák J (2003) Reliance on stored water increases with tree size in three species in the Pacific Northwest. Tree Physiol 23:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Potts BM, Wiltshire RJ (1997) Eucalypt genetics and genecology. Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–91Google Scholar
  71. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prober SM, Potts BM, Bailey T, Byrne M, Dillon S, Harrison PA, Hoffmann AA, Jordan R, McLean EH, Steane DA (2016) Climate adaptation and ecological restoration in eucalypts. Proc R Soc Vic 128:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 Aug 2017
  74. Roff DA (2002) Inbreeding depression: tests of the overdominance and partial dominance hypotheses. Evolution 56:768–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stackpole DJ, Vaillancourt RE, de Aguigar M, Potts BM (2010) Age trends in genetic parameters for growth and wood density in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genet Genomes 6:179–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0239-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stoehr M, Ott P, Woods J (2015) Inbreeding in mid-rotation coastal Douglas-fir: implications for breeding. Ann For Sci 72:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Strauss SY, Whittall JB (2006) Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 120–138Google Scholar
  78. Therneau T, Lumley T (2009) Survival: survival analysis, including penalised likelihood. R package Version 2.35–37. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html. Accessed 11 Sept 2017
  79. Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S, López-Moreno JI (2010) A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J Clim 23:1696–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Volker PW, Potts BM, Borralho NM (2008) Genetic parameters of intra-and inter-specific hybrids of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens. Tree Genet Genomes 4:445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams K, Potts B (1996) The natural distribution of Eucalyptus species in Tasmania. Tasforests 8:39–165Google Scholar
  83. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural Sciences and ARC Training Centre for Forest ValueUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations