Biology and distribution of Agrilus macer LeConte (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a species associated with sugarberry (Celtis laevigata Willd.) mortality in the southeastern USA
- 105 Downloads
Agrilus macer is attacking sugarberry trees in the southeastern USA, a region from which few specimens have been previously collected. Despite attacking at high densities, this species appears to be a secondary pest, and there is no evidence it carries harmful fungal pathogens.
Because the genus Agrilus Curtis includes significant forest pests, the association of a poorly known species, Agrilus macer LeConte, with unexplained sugarberry (Celtis laevigata Willd.) mortality in the southeastern USA is a cause for alarm.
This study sought to investigate the distribution and biology of A. macer and determine whether the species is a primary cause of observed tree mortality.
Through a series of studies and literature searches, we documented aspects of A. macer biology and distribution while focusing on egg-laying behavior and searching for fungal pathogens associated with oviposition sites.
A. macer appears to be widely distributed throughout the southern USA, but most records are from Texas and Louisiana. Egg mass densities up to 1.2 masses per 10 cm2 (equivalent to ~ 1.9 eggs per cm2) were observed on trunks, branches, and exposed roots of dying C. laevigata trees in our study area, with an average of 16 eggs per mass. Fungi isolated from discolored sapwood around larval galleries did not cause defoliation, dieback, or mortality of sugarberry in inoculation trials.
Our findings suggest that A. macer is a secondary pest on sugarberry and does not transmit harmful fungal pathogens.
KeywordsAgrilus Eggs Egg masses Fungal isolation Oviposition Saproxylic
We thank Roy Kibler for permission to work along the Greeneway in North Augusta. We are also grateful to the following individuals for responding to our request for specimen information: Lee Herman (American Museum of Natural History), Melissa Callahan (Auburn University Natural History Museum), Jacqueline Airoso (California State Collection of Arthropods), Patrice Bouchard and Anthony Davies (Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes), John Rawlings and Robert Androw (Carnegie Museum of Natural History Invertebrate Collection), John Morse and Mike Ferro (Clemson University Arthropod Collection), Christopher Grinter (Entomology Collection of the California Academy of Sciences), Jim Louderman and Crystal Maier (Field Museum of Natural History Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Myriapods and InvertEbase, NSF Award EF 14-02667), Rick Hoebeke (Georgia Natural History Museum), Philip Perkins (Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology), Tommy McElrath (Illinois Natural History Survey Insect Collection), Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, Gary Parsons and Anthony Cognato (Albert J. Cook Arthropod Research Collection at Michigan State), Terence Lee Schiefer (Mississippi Entomological Museum), Weiping Xie and Brian Brown (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County), Hellen Vessels (New Mexico State University Arthropod Collection), Bob Blinn (North Carolina State University Insect Collection), Luciana Musetti (Ohio State Triplehorn Insect Collection), Phil Mulder and Jana Slaughter (Oklahoma State-K.C. Emerson Entomology Museum), Robert Androw Private Collection, Charyn J. Micheli and Eugenio H. Nearns (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History), Karen Wright (Texas A&M Insect Collection), Texas Tech Insect Collection, Wendy Moore and Wesley E. Hall (University of Arizona), Michael S. Engel (University of Kansas Natural History Museum), and Stylianos Chatzimanolis (University of Tennessee Natural History Museum). Finally, we thank three anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
This research was funded by the USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station including a grant from Forest Health Protection’s Evaluation Monitoring program (SO-EM-17-04).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bauer LS, Duan JJ, Gould JR (2014) Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). In: Driesche RV, Reardon R (eds) The use of classical biol control to preserve forests in North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, pp 189–209Google Scholar
- Chapman RN (1915) Observations of the life history of Agrilus bilineatus. J Agric Res 3:283–293Google Scholar
- Cheng Y, Schenck N (1978) Effect of soil temperature and moisture on survival of the soybean root rot fungi Neocosmospora vasinfecta and Fusarium solani in soil. Plant Dis Rep 62:945–949Google Scholar
- Chittenden FH (1900) Food plants and injury of North American species of Agrilus. United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology 64–68.Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Coleman T, Seybold J, S (2008) Previously unrecorded damage to oak, Quercus spp., in southern California by the goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Pan-Pac Entomol 84:288–300. https://doi.org/10.3956/2008-18.1
- Coleman TW, Seybold SJ (2016) Goldspotted oak borer in California: Invasion history, biology, impact, management, and implications for Mediterranean forests worldwide. In: Paine T, Lieutier F (eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Springer, Cham, pp 663–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24744-1_22
- Duncan WH, Duncan MB (1988) Trees of the southeastern United States. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
- Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haack RA, Petrice TR, Zablotny JE (2009) First report of the European oak borer, Agrilus sulcicollis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in the United States. Great Lakes Entomol 42:1–7Google Scholar
- Harpootlian PJ, Bellamy CL (2014) Jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of South Carolina. Clemson University Clemson. In: SCGoogle Scholar
- Hellmut H (1956) Zur biologie, Ökologie und zum massenwechsel des buchenpracht käfers (Agrilus viridis L.): II. Teil. Z Angew Entomol 39:76–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1956.tb01244.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hespenheide H, Westcott R, L. Bellamy C (2011) Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of the Baja California peninsula, Mexico. Zootaxa 2805:36–56Google Scholar
- Klowden MJ (2013) Chapter 4—reproductive systems. In: Klowden MJ (ed) Physiological Systems in Insects, Third edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 197–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415819-1.00004-0
- Nelson GE, Hespenheide HA (1998) A re-evaluations of some Agrilus Curtis species (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Col Bull 52:31–34 The Coleopterists SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Nelson PE, Marasas WFO, Toussoun TA (1983) Fusarium species: an illustrated manual for identification. Pennsylvania State University Press, University ParkGoogle Scholar
- Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:23–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.000323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petrice TR, Haack RA, Strazanac JS, Lelito JP (2009) Biology and larval morphology of Agrilus subcinctus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), with comparisons to the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Great Lakes Entomol 42:173–184Google Scholar
- Samuelson LJ, Hogan ME (2003) Forest trees: a guide to the southeastern and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.JGoogle Scholar
- Smith EF (1899) Wilt disease of cotton, watermelon and cowpea (Neocosmospora nov. gen.). United States Department of Agriculture Bull. No. 17: 1–53Google Scholar
- Solomon JD (1995) Guide to insect borers in North American broadleaf trees and shrubs. Agriculture handbook: AH-706. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Solomon JD, Wilson AD, Leininger TD, Lester DG, McCasland CS, Clarke S, Affeltranger C (1997) Sugarberry dieback and mortality in southern Louisiana: Cause, impact, and prognosis. Res. Pap. SRS-9. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 19 pGoogle Scholar
- Tirmenstein DA (1990) Celtis laevigata var. reticulata. In: Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/cellaer/all.html
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) 38—amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
- Zabel R, Wang C, Anagnost S (1991) Soft-rot capabilities of the major microfungi isolated from Douglas-fir poles in the northeast. Wood Fiber Sci 13:220–237Google Scholar